Paul Connaughton Snr (Galway East, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 76: To ask the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the efforts he is making to have the Hague Preferences established as a principle of the Common Fisheries Policy as opposed to the annual negotiation currently required in the context of TAC and quotas; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [44066/08]

Brendan Smith (Cavan-Monaghan, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

When Ireland joined the EEC in 1973, the Community received a very significant additional fishing resource out to the 200 mile limit. At that time however, Ireland's fishing industry was totally underdeveloped.

In this context, the 1976 Hague Agreement recognised the development needs of peripheral regions whose populations were heavily dependent on fishing activity. The Hague Agreement allowed Ireland to double its 1975 catches of a number of stocks. These target catches are called the Hague Targets. The UK was also granted a number of Hague Targets. The actual quotas are set for relevant stocks at the average of what the quota would have been without the Hague and the relative proportion of the Hague target.

The Hague Preferences have been a fundamental part of relative stability and have been recognised as such in the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) framework since 1983. Most recently the Hague Preferences are recognised in Council Regulation 2371/2002 following the review of the CFP in 2001/2002. Further, the European Court (in 1998) upheld the appropriateness of the Council giving effect to the principle of relative stability through the application of the allocation keys together with the operation of the Hague Preference to take account of the special needs of Ireland and the northern part of the United Kingdom. At the Fisheries Council, each December, Ireland has consistently, and successfully, argued that Relative Stability has therefore to be applied taking due account of the prior Hague Agreement.

There is, however, strong opposition to the application of the Hague Preferences from certain Member States and the European Court judgment of 1998 does give discretion on their application to the Council. It is important to be aware that with reduced Total Allowable Catches in recent years, the impact of the application of the Hague Preferences is increasing both for Ireland which gets increased quotas and for other Member States whose quotas reduce. We are likely to face significant opposition to their application at Council this year.

I remain of the view that the invocation of the Hague Preference continues to constitute an essential part of the system of relative stability as applied under the CFP, and will look to the Commission and Council to continue to respect invocations of the Hague Preference at this December Fisheries Council. Going forward, I am also committed to the continuation and strengthening of the Hague Preferences in the CFP legal framework in the planned review which must be completed by 2012.