Written answers

Tuesday, 7 November 2006

Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government

Services for People with Disabilities

8:00 pm

Photo of Catherine MurphyCatherine Murphy (Kildare North, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 521: To ask the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the amount of funding returned to his Department by local authorities in 2005 from the disabled persons and essential repairs grant funds in each county; the local authorities that impose an income test to these grants schemes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36658/06]

Photo of Catherine MurphyCatherine Murphy (Kildare North, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 522: To ask the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if the review of the operation of the disabled persons grant scheme has concluded; if it is intended that his Department will fully fund the scheme rather than relying on part funding by local authorities; when he will publish the results of the review; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36660/06]

Photo of Noel AhernNoel Ahern (Dublin North West, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I propose to take Questions Nos. 521 and 522 together.

The tabular statement gives details of the combined capital allocation for disabled persons and essential repairs grants notified to each local authority in 2005 and the combined out-turn expenditure on the schemes by each local authority. In 2005, the capital allocation for these schemes was €74.5m and out-turn expenditure notified to the Department by local authorities was €64.6m.

The combined capital allocation to local authorities for the disabled persons and essential repairs grant schemes represents not a capital grant, but the total amount which authorities are authorised to spend on the schemes in the year in which the allocation is made. Expenditure on the grant schemes is funded by the two-thirds recoupment available from my Department together with the one-third contribution from the revenue resources of the local authority. The allocations were made on the basis of local authorities' best estimate of the likely level of grant approvals during 2005.

The out-turn reflects the expenditure by local authorities on approved applications. However, some grant approvals by local authorities may not subsequently be taken up by applicants. In addition, if there are delays in applicants completing the approved works, either due to a delay in getting contractors or for other reasons, the ultimate spend may arise in later years.

In the light of the high level of demand for these grants, my Department requests each local authority to examine the level of payments and approvals on both schemes throughout the year with a view to establishing the adequacy or otherwise of their allocations. Requests for increases from authorities whose allocations are proving inadequate are dealt with in the context of the surplus funding available from authorities whose allocation may emerge to be surplus to their requirements.

The administration of the Disabled Persons Grant scheme is delegated to local authorities within the framework laid down in statutory regulations; as far as is practicable, this is designed to give an appropriate degree of flexibility at local level. In light of the increased demand for grant assistance, the majority of local authorities have reviewed their schemes over recent years in order to streamline their operation and have introduced a variety of mechanisms to ensure the available resources are targeted to those in most need, including medical prioritisation, means-testing and/or cost control. My Department does not have detailed information on the number of local authorities which currently have means-testing in place.

The review of the Disabled Persons Grant scheme, which incorporates the conditions governing the Essential Repairs Grant scheme and the Special Housing Aid for the Elderly scheme, was recently finalised within my Department. The issue of means-testing and the requirement that local authorities make a contribution from their own resources towards the financing of the scheme have been considered in the context of the overall review. My Department is currently preparing proposals for the future operation of the schemes, in conjunction with other public agencies concerned, and I expect to be in a position to announce these shortly.

Table: Disabled Persons & Essential Repairs Grants allocations and expenditure 2005
Local AuthoritiesAllocation 2005Expenditure 2005
County Councils
Carlow960,000515,696
Cavan1,800,0001,585,078
Clare1,660,0001,645,704
Cork (n)1,500,0001,701,530
Cork (s)2,500,0002,308,450
Cork (w)1,000,000819,518
Donegal4,300,0003,084,367
Dún Laoghaire/Rathdown2,250,0001,638,240
Fingal1,520,0001,202,990
Galway2,880,0002,819,084
Kerry1,760,0001,891,276
Kildare1,500,0001,564,003
Kilkenny780,000613,612
Laois2,100,0002,094,136
Leitrim2,600,0001,297,009
Limerick1,140,0001,199,756
Longford900,000619,533
Louth1,120,0001,478,965
Mayo1,600,0001,476,252
Meath2,880,0001,780,302
Monaghan1,450,0001,463,683
North Tipperary1,740,0001,481,116
Offaly1,255,0001,765,695
Roscommon1,800,0001,792,614
Sligo505,000308,826
South Dublin3,600,0004,218,987
South Tipperary3,100,0001,826,794
Waterford1,020,000994,021
Westmeath1,350,000994,142
Wexford1,050,000841,891
Wicklow2,000,0001,631,735
City Councils
Cork1,800,000759,801
Dublin13,500,00013,053,836
Galway1,300,000809,829
Limerick900,000433,838
Waterford650,000648,752
Borough Councils
Sligo700,000222,330
Town Councils
Bray30,00060,198
Total74,500,00064,643,589

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.