Maurice Cummins (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

The Order of Business is No. 1, motion re the Companies Act 2014 (Section 1313) Regulations 2015, back from committee, to be taken without debate on the conclusion of the Order of Business; No. 2, Statute Law Revision Bill 2015 - Second Stage, to be taken at 12.45 p.m. and to adjourn not later than 3 p.m., with the contributions of group spokespersons not to exceed eight minutes and those of all other Senators not to exceed five minutes; No. 3, Children (Amendment) Bill 2015 - Committee Stage, to be taken at 3 p.m. and to adjourn not later than 5 p.m., if not previously concluded; and No. 3a, statements on Aer Lingus, to be taken at 5 p.m., with the contributions of all Senators not to exceed five minutes, and the Minister to be called on to reply to the debate not later than 6.25 p.m.

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I circulated two motions earlier this morning. The first was to the effect that Seanad Éireann calls on the Government to reject the offer from IAG to purchase the 25.1% stake in Aer Lingus, thereby protecting Ireland's strategic interests into the future. The second motion was that Seanad Éireann recommends that should the Government proceed with the sale of the 25.1% stake in Aer Lingus, the moneys received should be used to reduce the savage cuts imposed on Aer Lingus pension scheme members. Both of those motions were submitted this morning.

Maurice Cummins (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

They are not on the Order Paper.

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

They were submitted this morning. They are not on the Order Paper because, in fairness, while it is not the fault of the Leader, the manner in which the debate on Aer Lingus has taken place in the Lower House has been nothing but farcical in terms of timing and when the debate will finish. We thought the Minister might come to the House yesterday evening but he did not. He could not. That is fair enough as he was in the Dáil. He is back in the House today at 5 p.m., 18 minutes after the Dáil will vote on the sale of Aer Lingus, to take statements on it. What is the point? The reason I tabled the motions this morning was that, in effect, at least the Seanad would have a voice in this-----

Gerard Craughwell (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Hear, hear.

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

-----and it would be able to give its opinion on the matter.I ask the Cathaoirleach to strongly reconsider motion No. 1, which I tabled on my behalf and that of my colleagues in Fianna Fáil. I look for support from everyone else for the motion to be taken today, before the Minister, Deputy Donohoe, comes to the House.

A number of issues have arisen. I listened to Deputy Michael McNamara in the other House outline why he will not support the sale. I also note with interest that SIPTU will not support the sale. I am astonished that neither the Taoiseach nor the Minister for Transport, according to the Taoiseach, has had sight of the Nyras report, which highlights the potential for massive job losses within Aer Lingus. The Taoiseach said yesterday that he had not seen any of the documentation, yet the Cabinet made a decision on it. I discussed this with Senator Bacik yesterday.

There is a very good reason for selling 74.9% of the airline, namely, to invest money in the airline, in new aircraft and in making the airline viable. Under EU state aid rules, direct Government investment in the airline was not allowed. The reason 25.1% was kept was to ensure that the State kept a strategic interest in the airline and its direction, and to make sure that the sphere of influence for the airline stayed in Ireland.

A false process has been going on for two years or more, since the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection, Deputy Joan Burton, brought in the Social Welfare and Pensions Act 2013. That was the start of it, because it gave the Minister the power to remove people unilaterally from their pension schemes and reduce pension scheme benefits unilaterally without the permission of members. That was to make sure that Aer Lingus and the IASS knew they could build up the deficit. They doubled the deficit within two years because the Government had laid out the roadmap for the changes it intended to make.

The Government then brought in savage cuts in the State airports Act, for which Fine Gael and the Labour Party voted, and took 60% of pension benefits from long-service members and six weeks' pay from retired people who had given their whole lives to the airline. The Government did that. Lo and behold, two weeks after that, an offer came in from IAG to buy the Government stake. I do not think it is a coincidence; it was all choreographed and had been coming down the track. I said that to the Tánaiste over two years ago and she denied it at the time. The Labour Party denied it at the time and it lied at the time. That is a fact, because this was all choreographed.

The reality of the situation is that the 5,000 workers in the airport and the 3,500 people working in Aer Lingus are concerned about their jobs because the Government has not done proper due diligence on this offer and considered the Nyras report, which highlights job cuts of 20% in ground handling, 40% in catering, 15% in maintenance and 25% in heavy maintenance, as well as cabin crew and pilots.

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

You are way over time.

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

The problem is that all of this will not be discussed in the Seanad until the Government sheep in the other House march behind their Ministers and vote for what they said only two months ago they would not do. At the Labour Party conference, it was said that if Aer Lingus was sold the money would be used to defray the cuts to IASS members. That will not be done. The money will be put into a connectivity fund. Why is that needed if there is no threat to connectivity between Ireland, Britain and the rest of the world? It is absolute nonsense.

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Senator, you are way over time.

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

If I cannot get these two motions on the Order Paper, I will propose an amendment to the Order of Business to the effect that Seanad Éireann calls on the Government to reject the offer from IAG to purchase a 25.1% stake in Aer Lingus, thereby protecting Ireland's strategic interests into the future. I want that discussed before the Minister for Transport comes before the House at 5 p.m., 18 minutes after the Labour Party and Fine Gael sell off the strategic interest of this State in Aer Lingus and given another slap in the face to the 15,000 members of the IASS who-----

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Senator, are you requesting me to allow the motion-----

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

If the Cathaoirleach does not put the motion on the Order Paper today-----

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I have given very careful consideration to the motion, which I did not get until 10.30 a.m.

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I understand that.

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

There are timeframes regarding motions and I have made my ruling. I have not agreed to the motion going ahead. You are now proposing an amendment-----

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Okay. I respect the ruling, as I always do. It is unfortunate and I am very disappointed in it. I am, therefore, proposing an amendment to the Order of Business to the effect that, directly after the Order of Business, not at 5 p.m., a debate take place in the Seanad for one or two hours - I will leave that open to my colleagues - in which we can address issues and the Seanad can have a voice in rejecting the below-cost offer which, if accepted by the Government, will do extreme damage to Aer Lingus and the State and copperfasten the savage cuts the Government has introduced to the 15,000 members of the IASS.

I want to be clear. I am proposing an amendment to the Order of Business to the effect that the debate should happen straight after the Order of Business. We can discuss the two motions I tabled, which the Government, unfortunately, has not accepted. One deals with rejecting the sale and the other with what should happen if the Government proceeds with it, namely, that the proceeds be used to defray the cuts in the pension scheme.

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

You are looking for a debate.

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I am looking for a debate. It is extremely disappointing that the Seanad, because of the way business has been scheduled this week, will have no voice whatsoever in the sale of the stake of the Government and taxpayers in Aer Lingus. That is the reality of how the business has been scheduled.

Maurice Cummins (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

We have no say in the sale.

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Our voice will not even be heard. The problem is that the Seanad has-----

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Senator O'Brien, through the Chair. There are two issues. You have already sent motions to me.

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I have, and you are not accepting them.

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I am not prepared to accept them.

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Which is a shame.

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

There are statements later on this particular issue.

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Yes, after the vote is taken in the Dáil.

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

What exactly are you proposing?

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

That the statements take place after the vote happens in the Dáil makes the statements irrelevant, because the decision will have been made. That is pathetic and it is the fault of the Government, not the Cathaoirleach, for listing the business that way.

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Senator, is your amendment to the Order of Business to bring forward the statements-----

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

It is to bring forward the statements so that they are taken directly after the Order of Business.

Maurice Cummins (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

It is that No. 3abe taken before No. 1. Can I help the Senator?

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

The Leader can, but it would have been helpful if we had scheduled-----

Maurice Cummins (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

We will be rejecting it, but I can help the Senator.

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I thank the Leader. In fairness, people need to know where different groups stand on this issue.

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Senator, you are way over time.

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

My amendment is that No. 3abe taken after the Order of the Business. It is a grave disappointment to us that the Seanad will still not have a voice because the motions have been ruled out.

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Senator, you can make those points during the debate. I call Senator Bacik.

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

We should be voting on those motions.

Ivana Bacik (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

It is very difficult to sit and listen to Senator O'Brien's brazen hypocrisy on the issue of Aer Lingus. As I said, his party, when in government, presided over the effective privatisation of Aer Lingus by selling off 74.9% of its share. It is brazen hypocrisy, and nothing less than that. Furthermore, the Senator has now spoken for nearly 20 minutes on the subject of Aer Lingus. I do not know why he is looking for-----

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Senator Bacik, he has not spoken for 20 minutes. I have timed him.

Ivana Bacik (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

It is now 11.50 a.m.

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Senator Bacik, I can tell you the business of the House did not start until 11.38 a.m.

Ivana Bacik (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

He still spoke for a lot longer than the time allowed. Given that the Leader has scheduled a debate on Aer Lingus today, as requested by many of us, and that the Minister will be on his feet in the Dáil for most of the day, I do not see how we can have the debate any earlier. I ask the Senator to read the letter sent by the CEO of Aer Lingus, Mr. Stephen Kavanagh, to the Minister of State, Deputy Gerald Nash, and Labour Party colleagues, providing reassurance on the register-----

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

He is benefiting from the sale.

Ivana Bacik (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I did not interrupt Senator O'Brien.

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Senator Bacik, without interruption.

Ivana Bacik (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

He provided helpful reassurance on the issue of registered employment agreements, compulsory redundancies and outsourcing, three of the key issues which most concern many of us in the proposed sale. I welcome the announcement by the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government today of a €91 million investment in housing. Senator Hayden will also welcome the announcement, as she has spoken eloquently on the issue on numerous occasions in this House. The fund is hugely welcome. It will make social housing available in greater quantities, which will improve housing for people with disabilities. The investment includes funds for retrofitting homes to improve energy efficiency. It will also ensure that more than 1,000 vacant social housing units will be refurbished for people who are on the social housing waiting list, at a cost of €20 million. Vacant units are known as voids, and this is one of the issues that many of us have raised here repeatedly. I ask the Leader to arrange a debate in early course on the issue of investment in housing. In the meantime, I welcome this important announcement.

Finally, I ask the Leader for a debate on prison and penal reform in light of the 11 reports by the prison visiting committees which were published yesterday by the Minister for Justice and Equality. Some of the reports were positive, certainly with regard to the refurbishment and greatly improved conditions at Mountjoy Prison. The reports also clearly identified many key challenges that remain, including the imprisonment of young people and the issue of drugs within prisons. I ask the Leader for a debate on prison reform, in light of those reports, before the end of the summer.

David Norris (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I second the amendment proposed by Senator Darragh O'Brien.

I would like to ask for a debate on ethics in sport in view of the situation regarding Sepp Blatter. The whole international sports world is a byword for corruption. The International Olympic Committee is a mess. FIFA is a complete and absolute disgrace, with hundreds of millions of dollars washing around being used as bribes. Now Mr. Putin has come out and made the matter an international political thing. If anything would make me look further for the resignation of Sepp Blatter, it would be the support of Mr. Putin.

Mr. Blatter is the chief executive of FIFA, so he should know what goes on. There was the extraordinary situation in which a football match was awarded to Qatar but was scheduled to take place in the middle of the summer, which was absolute, utter and outrageous madness. The chief executive is responsible when there is systematic corruption, just as is the case in politics. If there is political corruption then a Minister is expected to resign. The corruption may be deemed somebody's fault down the line but the Minister resigns, and it should be the same for Sepp Blatter. The chief executive is either a nincompoop or a crook. If he did not know what was going on then he is a nincompoop and if he did then he is a crook.

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

The Senator has used very unparliamentary language.

David Norris (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

It is not a bit. I defy the Cathaoirleach to find the word nincompoop in the list of regulated words.

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

That is not the word I was talking about, as the Senator well knows.

David Norris (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

In terms of the word "crook", Mr. Blatter is a crook. It is as simple as that.

I wish to make a suggestion to the red-top newspapers or whatever they are called. I mean the tabloid newspapers, which I despise, but they are quite funny with their headlines. I suggest the headline "Splatter Blatter".

Ivana Bacik (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

The Senator has missed his vocation.

Colm Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I wish to raise the issue of home care providers, which was featured on the front page of the Irish Examinerthis morning. The fact is someone can serve five years in Mountjoy jail and still set up a company to provide home care the day after release. There is no regulation governing the matter. I published a Private Members' Bill on the matter over four months ago. Resistance to a debate on the matter came from the Department of Health and not from the Minister. The issue is now out in the public domain. It is scheduled to be a major issue for discussion at a conference taking place in Dublin today. Therefore, I ask that time be allocated for a debate on my Private Members' Bill in this House. The Bill, which is important, seeks to put in place proper regulation to cover people who provide home care. A huge number of people require a professional standard of home care and, therefore, a proper legislative structure should be put in place. The draft Bill has been published and is in this House. I ask that the matter be put on the agenda for a debate at the earliest possible date.

Thomas Byrne (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I have already given the Cathaoirleach notice of my intention, in accordance with Standing Orders, to seek an adjournment of the House in order to discuss the specific and urgent matter of Aer Lingus. I wish to make an appeal to the Leader. What vision do we have for the Seanad if we are only discussing Aer Lingus after the horse has bolted in the Dáil?

Gerard Craughwell (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Hear, hear.

Thomas Byrne (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

What is the Seanad for? Is it merely a debating Chamber? Do we merely rubber-stamp things? Is this a House of Parliament? If this was a serious House of Parliament then a debate on Aer Lingus would have been scheduled to take place before the Dáil vote so that all voices could be heard before the Dáil made its decision. I acknowledge that it is a decision for the Dáil. The idea that we can discuss Aer Lingus afterwards is plainly ludicrous. We do not need the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport to be present. It would be useful to have him attend, but we do not need to have him here, particularly if he is busy in the Dáil. We are here to make our voices known and to put them on the record of the Seanad. Perhaps our views can be taken into account by our colleagues in the Dáil. Among our number is Senator Barrett, who I presume is attending the banking inquiry at the moment. He is the foremost transport economist in the country. The idea that the opportunity to hear his views and vision must be postponed until after the Dáil vote is plainly ludicrous. The Seanad is for voices such as his. Senator Barrett was one of the people, in the 1980s, who helped to ensure that the Dublin to London airline market was opened up to competition, a move that has resulted in huge benefits for the country. I would like to hear his voice, if he is not attending the banking inquiry, before the Dáil votes on this matter at 4.42 p.m. I understand that is the time the vote is scheduled to take place. We will make a holy show of Parliament if we allow the debate to happen after the Dáil votes. One is left wondering whether the people should have abolished the Seanad when Fine Gael asked them to. The Leader is running the place into the ground if he allows this to happen, and we will have become completely irrelevant. I appeal to the Leader to have the debate before the Dáil votes so that all voices can be heard.

I wish to briefly mention another matter. I tabled a Commencement matter the other day when the Minister of State at the Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government, Deputy Ann Phelan, was in attendance. She gave me certain information, which I forwarded to local media and residents in a particular area, using her exact words. Deputy Helen McEntee then stepped in to say that the Minister of State was wrong and merely gave her own opinion. Can we rely on what Ministers or Ministers of State tell us in this Chamber? Do Fine Gael backbenchers know more than Ministers or Ministers of State? If a Minister of State comes in here and does not state the facts of a situation in response to a very specific question, then she should not be a Minister of State and should resign. We need procedures in place to deal with this matter. It is a matter for the Cathaoirleach as well.

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

No. I have no control over any response that a Minister gives in the House.

Thomas Byrne (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

The Seanad should have control where a Government backbencher contradicts a Minister. Somebody is right and somebody is wrong.

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Both of them are Members of the other House.

Thomas Byrne (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

We need to know who is right.

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Both of them are Members of the other House. I have no control over what they say.

Thomas Byrne (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

The Cathaoirleach has no control over them? Are we meant to get the proper answers to Commencement matters? I do not want to hear a row between a backbencher and a Minister of State. I want to know what the exact position is. It seems absolutely ludicrous that a backbencher would know more than a Minister of State. What is the position? What is the story? What can we rely on in terms of what we are told in this House?

Lorraine Higgins (Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I wish to raise an issue with regard to the terms and conditions of the new beef genomics scheme created by the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine. The issue is unique in nature because a huge majority of farmers in County Galway do not wish to participate in it. Under the scheme farmers will be given money, but they do not want it because they fear the terms and conditions of the scheme. I cannot blame them for having such fears. Recently I attended a meeting of the IFA and its members held in Tuam, County Galway, where as many as 700 farmers were present. On foot of the meeting I reviewed the terms and conditions of the scheme, and now I have serious reservations about parts of the scheme.

The Department needs to go back to the drawing board when it comes to the six-year rule. The clause needs to be eliminated, because I firmly believe that every year should stand on its own merit. If somebody is disqualified from participating in the scheme, then it is patently unfair and inequitable that every payment ever made under the scheme can be clawed back, irrespective of a lack of proof of previous breaches. The clause is wrong and flies in the face of natural and constitutional justice. I have written to the Minister about the matter. Clawbacks of this nature are more punitive, rather than less. It is important that the Minister understand that clawbacks would be unenforceable in a court of law if, on balance, they are deemed to be penalty clauses.

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Does the Senator seek a debate? This may be more suitable for a Commencement matter.

Lorraine Higgins (Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I raised the matter because the scheme will close quite soon and, therefore, it is important to extend the deadline. It is also important that the Minister come in here to discuss the matter. We have a situation in which farmers will be penalised in the short term but the State will be penalised in the long term if farmers pursue a legal action through the courts. I want a debate arranged to discuss the scheme with the Minister at the earliest possible opportunity.

Feargal Quinn (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I was planning to congratulate the Leader on arranging the debate on Aer Lingus because it was not planned yesterday but we were told one was scheduled late last evening. However, having listened to Senators Darragh O'Brien and Byrne today, it does not make sense to have a debate at 5 p.m. after the Dáil has made its decision, nor does it make sense because, as Senator Byrne said, Senator Barrett will not be in the House before the decision is made. We are very fortunate Senator Barrett, the foremost transport economist in the country, is a Member of the House, but he is tied up at the banking inquiry today. I urge the Leader to find time to accept Senator Darragh O’Brien’s amendment. We should have that debate immediately after the Order of Business, which will give us time to do all the other jobs we have to do.

The news today that Ireland has slipped back to sixteenth place in the competition league is bad. The Taoiseach wants Ireland to be the best small country in the world in which to do business and yet we have slipped to sixteenth place in the world. If we are to achieve what we must achieve, we can do that but with a Government policy, commitment and dedication to removing the barriers to competitiveness so that we can become more competitive in the future.

Michael Mullins (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I support Senator Higgins’ call for a debate with the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine on the beef genomics scheme. The one bit of good news is that he has announced an extension of the deadline for applications, giving farmers an additional week to apply. Approximately 15,000 applications have been received to date. Hopefully that number will increase significantly over the coming week. There are a few issues of concern to the farmers and it is important to have a meeting with the Minister to tease some of those out so that the level of applications will increase significantly.

I very much welcome that €91 million is being made available for social housing initiatives, as announced today. Of this €5 million will be spent in County Galway, €689,000 will be spent on bringing 42 units back into use. In total over 1,000 units will be refurbished nationwide. In Galway city and county €2.7 million will be allocated for investment in housing adaptation grants for older people with disabilities, which is very welcome. In addition, €1.2 million will be spent on retrofitting social housing in Galway to make it more energy efficient. I hope this is a significant start in making much more social housing available so that the long waiting lists in our county can be reduced significantly over the next couple of years.

Trevor Ó Clochartaigh (Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Ba mhaith liom aontú leis na cainteoirí ar an dtaobh seo den Teach atá tar éis a gcuid imní maidir leis an díolachán atá ar bun de Aer Lingus a lua chomh maith.

What is happening around the Aer Lingus debacle is really disgraceful, rushing through such an important and strategic decision without the full information being given to these Houses, without proper debate and without allowing the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Transport and Communications to go through it in great detail. It reminds me of previous debacles such as Irish Water and the Irish Bank Resolution Corporation, IBRC, when the Government said “Don’t worry lads, this will be all right, just take our word for it”. We can see what happened as a result. I support the call for the amendment to the Order of Business. The fact that workers’ rights are being left as the final thing to be tied up or discussed in such situations is indicative of the way this Government approaches workers’ rights. There are other situations, such as the Dunnes Stores scenario and the zero hour contracts, which are ongoing.

This type of attitude is filtering into local communities. I am aware of a nursing home in Tuam in County Galway that refuses to recognise the rights of workers there to union recognition. The workers in that nursing home work very hard and have been looking for that right through the State’s mechanisms but the employers are turning it down point blank. It is about time the Labour Party stood up, said enough is enough and that it will not stand for this trampling on workers’ rights any more. The problems around the pensions in Aer Lingus show that Fine Gael has made the Labour Party capitulate on these issues. This is Labour Party’s chance to stand up and be counted and try to salvage something from a Government which has a pitiful record on workers’ rights.

Terry Brennan (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I agree with the statements of Senators on the other side of the fence that it is a futile exercise to have a debate on Aer Lingus this afternoon after the decision has been made. It should happen sooner, if at all possible. I encourage the Leader to fit in an hour and cancel what is already on the programme to discuss it. Whether we can make a difference is another matter.

From 1 July new household food waste regulations will come into existence. These require that food waste be segregated from other waste and no longer placed in the black bin. Once segregated, food waste must either be subjected to a home composting process, which would save householders' money, or brought to an authorised treatment facility run by county councils. It is a significant change and I am calling for a debate on this. Many landfill sites throughout the country have, thankfully, been closed down. Where landfill sites still exist less is being deposited in them. I am concerned about what will happen to sites that have been closed for years. Are there proposals to use some of them for "gasification", a word used here yesterday by my colleague from Limerick? An urgent debate is required as soon as possible to alleviate people’s fears because this is a big change for householders and businesses.

Mary Ann O'Brien (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I want to raise the lack of progress on the charities regulator with the Minister for Justice and Equality. Jim Cusack, a journalist at the Irish Examiner, wrote recently about a children’s charity because four of the seven directors have resigned, citing irregular governance and expenses. A raft of questions need to be answered. The charities regulator has not commented on the case, and that is as it should be as an investigation is ongoing. We had much debate on this issue and celebrated 18 months ago the fact that the Charities Regulatory Authority was put in place but it is in a no-win situation, with high expectations from us and the public as a champion of transparency and integrity. The Minister for Justice and Equality is not putting the necessary funding or manpower into this. On 17 April, she provided charities with another year to register. Now, a very prominent children’s charity seems to be in trouble and four very prominent people have resigned from it. I need the Minister to interject, give us her thoughts and give the regulator some teeth so that we can all have faith. The Government gives between €4.5 billion and €5 billion to the charity sector. We need it regulated.This office seems to have been put away and put on the long finger. It is not good enough.

Gerard Craughwell (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I support the request by Fianna Fáil to change the Order of Business today. It is outrageous that we are going to have a debate after the deal is done.

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Hear, hear.

Gerard Craughwell (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

It is also outrageous that we do not hear from the only independent voice that I have heard, Senator Sean Barrett. I will not take any advice from those who are about to feather their own nest inside on the board of Aer Lingus, getting a huge payout once this deal is done, and other people who have conflicts of interest. I know the Leader is a decent man and I ask him to change the Order of Business.

I wish to raise today Article 44.2.2° of the Constitution, which guarantees that the State will not endow any specific religion. It has come as something of a shock to me to find out that, quite to the contrary, the State is endowing a religion through the chaplaincies that are appointed in institutes of technology all over this country. There are a number of serious issues involved. Salaries of €30,000 to €50,000 a year are being paid to chaplains but there is no selection process or application process and there are no criteria under which these chaplains are appointed, yet Trinity College pays its chaplains out of its own coffers. There is something seriously wrong in a country that, on the one hand, says it will not endow a religion and, on the other, appoints a specific set of religious preachers to third level education institutes, when the people who attend those institutes are all adults capable of making up their own minds as to what religion they want to follow. I ask the Leader to organise a debate which would include the issue of chaplaincy in schools and hospitals throughout the country and who pays for them.

Brian Ó Domhnaill (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I strongly support what my colleagues have said in regard to the Aer Lingus debacle. Without going into the specifics, this House is being disrespected today by the Government in not allowing for a debate prior to a decision being taken in the other House. We are dealing with a matter which is being driven by vested interests at the expense of the public interest.

Gerard Craughwell (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Hear, hear.

Brian Ó Domhnaill (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

We are not being given the opportunity here, as public representatives, to debate an issue of national significance and importance ahead of a decision being taken. I know it may not be at the discretion of the Leader and he may be forced into a situation by the Government. However, I would ask him to stand strong and represent the Seanad, not accept the push which is coming from the Government on this issue and to have a debate in the House before a decision is made in the other House.

I agree with other Senators that we should have a debate in regard to agriculture, particularly the beef genomics scheme, the closing date for which is today. It is not workable at all. We need a debate on that issue and on the other environmental schemes from Pillar 2 of the Common Agricultural Policy. These schemes are not working. Money is coming from Europe but farmers are unable to draw it down and unable to apply, given the complexities of the schemes. It needs a deeper debate than is possible in a Commencement debate because there are issues that need to be teased out with the Minister in the House. I ask that this be organised in the next few weeks.

I call on the Leader to have the Minister for Finance come before the House for a debate on the most recent European Commission recommendations and opinion on the national reform programme in Ireland. There are some damning statistics, information and opinion in the report, which outlines that while there is some level of economic improvement in the country, there are other issues like private and public debt which are not being addressed by public policy interventions. The report outlines the crisis in the health sector and also looks at the banks' self-reliant techniques in order to deal with people who find themselves in debt which they are unable to pay. I ask that the Minister for Finance come to the House for a debate on the report. In all of its public policy interventions, the Government is failing to deal with the outlook being expressed not only by the European Commission, but also by the IMF and others.

James Heffernan (Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

To follow on from what my two Fianna Fáil colleagues have said about Aer Lingus, a debate today is essential. As other colleagues have said, Senator Sean Barrett will be busy at the banking inquiry this afternoon and will not be here. In fairness, Senator Barrett is one of the few independent voices on this issue. He is a man who makes quite a lot of sense and is someone who should be listened to.

We are told this is a great deal by those members of the Dublin Airport Authority and the people in paid Government positions in Shannon and Cork. I do not take great heed of what they say. This is a further demonstration of the Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport's lack of commitment to the regions, in particular the mid-west. Limerick yesterday launched its campaign for the 2020 capital of culture, one I hope the Government will put its weight behind. However, by 2020 there may not be connectivity to bring people to the area. The Leader knows the road from Waterford to Limerick is diabolical, the road from the Cork to Limerick is a disgrace and the road from Limerick to Killarney and other areas is terrible. This move could be a serious blow to Shannon's connectivity in the mid-west.

It is not good enough. Even if this deal, unfortunately, seems to be a fait accompli, and perhaps there is not a whole pile that can be done about it, I believe that debate should take place earlier rather than later. I hung around yesterday because I thought the debate was going to take place at 9 p.m. last night but it did not happen, and I had thought it might have happened a couple of days ago but it did not. It has now been pushed aside again. I would like the Leader to accede to the amendment to the Order of Business and support calls for that debate to take place today.

Maurice Cummins (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I have listened to the views of Members in regard to the Aer Lingus debate. It was not possible to have it last night because the debate lasted until 10 p.m. in the other House. The Minister is in the other House until 5 p.m. today on the issue. As far as I know, the Minister does not have powers of bilocation as yet, so there is no prospect of having him here. However, in listening to what the Members have stated, I am prepared to amend the Order of Business so that we could have this debate immediately, but we will not have a Minister present.

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Can we have any Minister?

Maurice Cummins (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

How can I manufacture a Minister out of a hat?

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

They have enough of them.

Maurice Cummins (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I will sit here and then report back to the Minister myself. The Senators are looking for an amendment to the Order of Business that we would speak on that issue. I cannot supply a Minister at the drop of a hat.

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Then let us have the debate.

Maurice Cummins (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I will report on what is said to the Minister. Senators cannot have it all ways, as they want to have it with Aer Lingus. I am prepared to amend the Order of Business as follows: after the Order of Business, we would have a debate on Aer Lingus up to 2 p.m. with all spokespersons allocated five minutes; No. 2, Statute Law Revision Bill 2015 - Second Stage would be taken at 2 p.m. and adjourn not later than 3 p.m., with the contributions of group spokespersons not to exceed eight minutes and all other Senators not to exceed five minutes; and we would delete No. 3aon the supplementary Order Paper. That is in response to the request from Members of the House in trying to go some way to accede to their requests.As I said, the Minister does not have powers of bilocation and he cannot be here. I will relay what was said in the House to him. He was anxious to come into the Chamber but could not do so before 5 p.m.

Thomas Byrne (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

On a point of order, what the Leader has said is reasonable. Can I suggest that if Senator Barrett gets time from the committee and he does wish to speak, then Members could give way to him? He will only have a short time-----

Maurice Cummins (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

We cannot run the business of the House on whether a Member is here or not. That is one of the reasons that I have put the item down for 5 p.m. We could hear Senator Barrett at that stage because he will probably be finished at the committee by then. However, he will not be finished now to contribute to the debate now.

Thomas Byrne (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

He will have a lunch break.

Maurice Cummins (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

These matters have to be organised properly. One cannot organise business at the drop of a hat. This is what I have done to facilitate the House. I am amending the Order of Business accordingly.

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Is it just group spokespersons who have five minutes?

Maurice Cummins (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

All Senators will have five minutes.

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Is it up to 2 o’clock or 2.30 p.m.?

Maurice Cummins (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

It is up to 2 o’clock and we will continue the rest of business as outlined.

Senator Bacik and others raised the €91 million investment in housing that was announced by the Minister for the Environment, Community Local Government, Deputy Alan Kelly, today which is certainly to be welcomed. We are overdue a further debate on housing and I will try to arrange one.

Senator Bacik also called for a debate on recently published reports on prison and penal reform. I will ask the Minister for Justice and Equality to attend the House to debate those reports.

Senator Norris raised the question of ethics in sport. The Minister of State with responsibility for sport has been in the House on several occasions recently. There are certainly concerns about FIFA. I note the Senator’s points about the chief executive officer of the body and suggestions of corruption and so forth. That is a matter for FIFA, football’s governing body, to deal with. I do not think anything we say in this House will make any difference to the question of FIFA. We can certainly consider the question of ethics in sport and have a debate on it.

Senator Burke called for proper regulations for home care providers. As he rightly pointed out, he has a Bill on this issue on the Order Paper. We will certainly consider debating that Bill in Fine Gael’s next Private Members’ business.

Senators Higgins and Ó Domhnaill called for an extension to the beef genomic scheme and a debate on it with the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine. I am sure the Minister will be quite willing to come to the House to deal with the matter.

Senator Quinn pointed out how Ireland has dropped several places to 16th place in the world competitiveness standings. We had an excellent debate last night on the Springboard scheme. The issue of competitiveness is important to the development of our economy. I note Senator Quinn’s points in that regard and the Government is mindful of the situation also.

Senator Ó Clochartaigh raised the issue of workers’ rights. The Government has been strong on workers’ rights. I was disappointed in the contributions on yesterday's debate on the National Minimum Wage (Low Pay Commission) Bill 2015. Many Members over the past weeks and months have called for a debate on this issue. However, when legislation on it is before the House, a paltry number of Members speak on it. I was very disappointed with that yesterday.

Senator Brennan raised the question of food waste segregation. The House will take an environmental planning Bill later during the session. I am quite sure a number of speakers will want to come in on this Bill. Senator Brennan can raise this question on it then.

Senator Mary Ann O’Brien raised the issue of the charities regulator. I can assure her the regulator has teeth and powers which can be used. Due to requests from quite a number of charities, the Minister has given an extension to them to register with the regulator. Where irregularities have occurred, the charities regulator can investigate them. I was not aware of the specific case she raised. She can bring it to the attention of the Minister. I am sure the Minister will get the charities regulator to act on it.

Senator Craughwell raised the issue of payments to chaplains in third level institutions and institutes of technology. The chaplains play an important role in those education facilities. He said Trinity College Dublin pays its own chaplains. The others are paid by whom?

Gerard Craughwell (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

They are paid from the public purse.

Maurice Cummins (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I note the Senator’s point which I will raise with the Minister for Education and Skills. Is the Senator suggesting that college chaplains should not be paid from the public purse? Chaplains can be from either religion in institutes of technology and other third level institutions.

Gerard Craughwell (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I am suggesting that, like all public jobs, they should be advertised with criteria and interview panels.

Maurice Cummins (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I will bring the matter to the attention of the Minister for Education and Skills and the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform.

Senator Ó Domhnaill raised the issue of a European Commission report on national reforms. This will be debated along with other finance issues.

Senator Heffernan also raised the issue of Aer Lingus which I addressed earlier.

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Senator Darragh O’Brien has proposed an amendment to the Order of Business: “That No. 3aon the supplementary Order Paper be taken before No.1.” Is the amendment being pressed?

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I will withdraw it. I thank the Leader for going some way towards accommodating it. It is disappointing we do not have a Minister. I am not expecting the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport, Deputy Paschal Donohoe, to attend but the Government has a truckload of other Ministers and Ministers of State, all of whom should have an interest in what happens with Aer Lingus.

Maurice Cummins (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

The Senator will have to do with me.

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I am happy with the Leader.

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Is the Senator withdrawing the amendment?

Darragh O'Brien (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I am and I thank the Leader for varying today’s business. We will see how it goes.

Paddy Burke (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

The Leader has proposed an amendment to the Order of Business for new arrangements for the taking of No. 3a: “That the statements on the sale of Aer Lingus be taken at the conclusion of the Order of Business and conclude at 2 p.m., with the contributions of each Senator not to exceed five minutes and no Minister be required to attend.” Is that agreed? Agreed. That means No. 2 will be taken at 2 p.m.