Seanad debates
Thursday, 20 March 2003
Request to Move Adjournment of the Seanad under Standing Order 29.
10:30 am
Rory Kiely (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context
I have notice from Senator Norris regarding a motion he wishes to raise under Standing Order 29. I call Senator Norris to give notice of the motion before I give my ruling.
David Norris (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context
I ask that the House be adjourned under the terms of Standing Order 29 to debate an urgent matter, namely, the Anglo-American attack on the state of Iraq.
Rory Kiely (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context
I have given careful consideration to the matter raised by Senator Norris, which I regret that I have had to rule out of order on the grounds that I do not consider it to be contemplated by Standing Order 29 and because a comprehensive debate on the matter is scheduled for tomorrow.
David Norris (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context
I thank you, a Chathaoirligh, for your ruling. This demonstrates the glorious absurdity of all such rulings, not just yours but those in the tradition of the House.
Rory Kiely (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context
The Senator cannot debate the matter.
David Norris (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context
If you do not consider a war against Iraq that involves this State to be a matter of urgency, then I do not know what is.
Rory Kiely (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context
You cannot debate the matter, Senator.
David Norris (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context
Perhaps if war were declared on Ireland, you would give a similar ruling, a Chathaoirligh, so that the people could be reconciled to it.