Seanad debates

Tuesday, 4 February 2003

Adjournment Matters. - Fisheries Policy.

 

2:30 pm

Photo of Joe McHughJoe McHugh (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I acknowledge the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources, Deputy Ahern's, participation with the delegation from Donegal after Christmas. I also acknowledge his honesty. A few blunt instruments have been used in regard to Donegal due to the fact that perhaps things were based on anecdotal evidence as opposed to scientific data.

I will not use this opportunity as a launching pad to say what should or what could have done right. The reality is Donegal fishermen have lost out in this deal. I also acknowledge the lobby groups, the Greencastle fishermen and the Killybegs Fishermen's Association, and the proactive work they have done and the in-depth knowledge they have in relation to fishing in that part of the world.

I propose December as a milestone in regard to fishing in Donegal and throughout the country. The nine day rule will be reviewed in December and things will not change if there are no scientific data to prove some type of proactive measurement or a proactive management plan. I will not go through the nuts and bolts of the nine day rule which has been ploughed through almost to such an extent that it has exhausted many people.

I acknowledge the Minister's involvement but we, along the north-west coast, will have to start to invest in research. Research was done in the Irish Sea but it has not been carried out along the north-west coast. I call for investment in research involving the participants there, including the fishermen's association, because as I said they have in-depth expertise and knowledge. Bord Iascaigh Mhara and the Marine Institute are willing to see how they can move forward in terms of conservation. The measure in place in regard to the reduction in the fish mesh is contrary to conservation and sustainability. If we can collate all the anecdotal evidence and invest in research and if this Government is willing to do so, we will be in a position to say to the European Commission and Commissioner Fischler in December that the blunt instrument used this time is not a sustainable measure and that it is totally contradictory to any type of reasonable and logical conservation measure.

We must use December as a milestone, or a watershed, when we can turn the situation around. We cannot, however, go to the European Commission unless we have scientific data. The fishermen's lobby groups, the fishermen's associations, are willing to participate because they have in-depth knowledge and expertise beyond any I have, even though I was born on the coast. They are willing to participate and to enter into some type of partnership in regard to research with BIM and the Marine Institute to look at a long-term proactive management plan for the Irish coast. I thank the Minister of State for coming to the House.

Photo of John BrowneJohn Browne (Wexford, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I thank Senator McHugh for raising the issue and apologise for the absence of the Minister.

The fishing effort limitation scheme approved at the December Fisheries Council came into effect from 1 February 2003 and may run until the end of this year. The Commission has indicated that it is a temporary measure and that a further more detailed proposal will be presented for subsequent consideration by Council. I expect the Commission to present a proposal in the coming weeks following bilateral discussions currently under way between the Commission and member states.

The idea of a widespread fishing effort limitation scheme had been mooted by the European Commission throughout 2002. It was, therefore, an issue that featured prominently in the regular dialogue which the Department maintains with the Irish fishing industry. My opposition to fishing effort limitation has been consistent throughout and the Irish fishing industry has shared my concerns in this regard. I continue to maintain that the scheme is an extremely blunt instrument and do not believe that it will prove to be effective in fisheries management. Together with a number of like-minded colleagues, I emphasised this view at the December Council.

In the event, as the Senator is aware, the scheme was approved in a revised format and for a reduced area, predominantly covering the North Sea and certain waters to the west of Scotland. The agreement reached at Council means that there is no clear legal obligation on member states to implement it. To this end, I have recently signed a statutory instrument.

I have discussed the situation in some detail with representatives of the Irish fishing industry on a number of occasions since the December Council, including fishermen from Donegal and the Greencastle area, in particular. I have also ensured that the Department has worked closely with the industry to clarify issues about the scheme and the details associated with its implementation.

I am aware that this new scheme gives rise to difficulties for particular fishermen fishing off the north west coast using certain gear types. The nine day limit, to which the Senator referred, has now been increased to 11 days following discussions with the European Commission. The extra days represent an allowance for steaming time between home ports and fishing grounds as well as compensation for adjustment to fishing patterns.

However, it is important to stress that the 11 day limit applies only to one gear type. It is possible to fish for a greater number of days each month if certain other gear types are used or without any limit if fishing exclusively outside the area.

On the basis of an examination of recent log-sheet data, the best estimate is that a total of 24 Donegal based vessels fished in the area concerned with the fishing gear subject to the 11 day limit. Ten of these vessels also fished with other fishing gears subject to a 25 day limit. The impact of the regulation will, therefore, be dependent on the type of gear which vessels elect to use and the area in which they choose to fish.

As I have already indicated, I do not accept the validity of the Commission's approach. It does not ensure the sustainability of fish stocks, which is the primary aim. My position is supported by the Irish fishing industry and also by a number of other member states. When the Commission presents its detailed long-term proposals for the recovery of cod stocks in particular, the debate on the most effective way forward will again take centre stage.

There is serious concern about cod stocks and we must bear in mind that we are proceeding against the backdrop whereby the most recent scientific advice from ICES is for a closure of all fisheries for cod off the north-west coast of Ireland and Scotland as a targeted species or by-catch. It must, therefore, be acknowledged that stock recovery is unlikely unless stringent management action is taken.

I believe that such action should concentrate on improved technical conservation measures and better control and enforcement. An appropriate balance between protecting the livelihoods of coastal communities and having in place effective measures to ensure the sustainable exploitation of fish stocks is possible. That will be my priority in upcoming discussions on this issue.

Photo of Joe McHughJoe McHugh (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I thank the Minister for his frankness. We can move forward on this issue. Scientific data is the key for next December.