Dáil debates

Wednesday, 30 June 2010

Flood Relief

Closure of Laurel Unit in Cherry Orchard Hospital

9:00 pm

Photo of Mary UptonMary Upton (Dublin South Central, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I thank the Ceann Comhairle for the opportunity to raise this matter on the Adjournment.

The Laurel unit in Cherry Orchard Hospital is under threat of closure, which means the 19 patients currently being looked after there are to be moved to other units within the campus. It is important to note that the same process was engaged in last year when it was proposed that the Beech unit would be closed. Eventually, it was agreed to keep that unit open. The danger now is that we will have this crisis on a recurring basis and unit after unit will be targeted, which is very unfair.

The 19 people who are in this unit are high dependency and have various conditions, including Alzheimer's. Some are blind and some have had strokes. These people are in no state to be moved, nor should they. They are dependent on knowing a familiar environment and familiar things around them. They depend on knowing the nurses and carers who look after them on a regular basis. For people with limited mobility and capacity to find their way around, they will be completely disorientated if they are moved to a new unit.

Some of the patients have been in this unit for up to ten years. They have learned to cope with their surroundings and familiar items of furniture. This gives them some independence. They are able to manage to get around a little on their own but in a new and unfamiliar environment they will be confused and upset.

This is what their families are telling me on a constant basis. Their families have come to rely on the fact that the patients are familiar with their surroundings and are happy that the people being cared for are in a comfortable environment where they can move around with some confidence. In many cases, the only voices these people have are through their families. Many of them are not able to speak up for themselves. The family members are extremely concerned at the consequences of the moving of the patients from one unit to another. It is not like moving a mobile patient or someone who is recovering from surgery and will be going home in a short time. These are people for whom the Laurel unit has, effectively, become their home over a number of years.

This is short-term saving with long-term costs, particularly if the patients, when they are moved, are unhappy and confused and find themselves in what they perceive to be a foreign environment. The patients' needs should be put before a very small financial saving. It is time for the Government to address the real issues of our health system by putting the welfare of these patients before a small saving for the health service. Deputy Naughten outlined a number of areas where savings could be made more effectively.

I am urging the Minister to review the decision to close the unit and, in the interest of patient comfort and security, to ensure that adequate staff and carer service is provided. The request is a modest one, in the scheme of things. I understand that only two nurses and two carers are needed to maintain the unit in operation. This is a small investment to ensure the comfort and peace of mind of a number of vulnerable people who, for the most part, have come to be dependent on the familiarity of their surroundings. It will cause real hardship to the patients and their families if the patients are asked to go to a new and different and, to them, foreign environment.

The Minister should look at this from the patients' point of view and not be influenced by the very small financial saving which will have long-term negative consequences for the patients.

Photo of Barry AndrewsBarry Andrews (Dún Laoghaire, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I thank Deputy Upton for raising this issue. I am taking this matter on behalf of the Minister for Health and Children and it provides me with an opportunity to reaffirm the Government's commitment to services for older people.

Government policy with regard to older people is to support people to live in dignity and independence in their own homes and communities for as long as possible. Where this is not feasible, the health service supports access to quality long-term residential care where this is appropriate and we continue to develop and improve health services in all regions of the country and to ensure quality and patient safety.

The Health Service Executive has operational responsibility for the delivery of health and social services, including those at facilities such as Cherry Orchard Hospital. The Deputy will appreciate that all developments have to be addressed in the light of the current economic situation. The executive has been asked to make a rigorous examination of how existing funding might be used to ensure that the maximum number of people benefit from the best service possible. This requires on-going review.

Cherry Orchard Hospital provides services for older people, younger people with chronic illness or disability, and for people suffering with of AIDS-HIV infection, as well as Drug Detox beds, broken down as follows: long stay care of the elderly (170 beds); respite care of the elderly (22 beds); young chronic sick long stay (29 beds); young chronic sick respite (6 beds); AIDS/HIV Unit (17 beds) and; acute drug detox unit (17 Beds).

The hospital therefore currently has 261 beds, and capacity for day care for eight elderly people. In order to manage the hospital more efficiently within existing resources and to ensure that the same number of patients have access to the service they need in Cherry Orchard it was decided to consolidate one long stay unit on the campus. Residents in the 23 bedded Laurel unit are being moved on a phased basis, to other vacancies within Cherry Orchard.

The HSE has assured the Department of Health and Children that this will have no effect on existing respite and other services, which will remain unchanged. It will allow the hospital to continue to provide its usual high standard of quality care to residents, and the process will be closely overseen by nurse management to ensure the minimum discomfort to residents.

The HSE has advised that where patients are required to move within the campus the families concerned can be met on an individual basis by local management and nursing management. Advocates for the patient/family can with the appropriate permission also attend these meetings. The meetings with each family concerned allows for a patient focused approach to this situation and will be handled in a manner sensitive to the needs of the patient and their families. In addition the confidentiality and dignity of the residents can be maintained at all times. Patients and their families will be given time to consider the options available to them.

The HSE also held a meeting to which all local public representatives were invited on 29 June 2010. At the meeting local councillors outlined the concerns expressed by families of residents who had approached them. This included staffing issues at the hospital.

Employment control frameworks have been used for a number of years in the health sector to give effect to Government policies on the number employed in the health sector. The 2009 framework gave effect to the Government decision on the moratorium on recruitment, promotion, or payment of an allowance for the performance of duties at a higher grade. The Health Sector Employment Control Framework 2010-2012 has been agreed between the Departments of Health and Children and Finance and has issued to the HSE. The framework provides for a target reduction in health numbers of 1,520 wholetime equivalents.

Once this target is being met, the HSE is able to recruit staff in grades that are exempted from the moratorium. This includes certain frontline grades to address needs in the community, including areas such as care of the elderly, mental health, people with disabilities and child protection. In addition to these exempted grades, the 2010 framework allows the HSE, subject to meeting the target reduction of 1,520, to fill critical posts by way of exceptions to the moratorium. Such exceptions may be made where the HSE has satisfied itself that there are compelling reasons for doing so in order to maintain essential frontline services. This arrangement supersedes the requirement to obtain the approval of the Departments of Health and Children and of Finance for the filling of any vacancy arising in a post in a non-exempted grade. It is, therefore, a matter for the HSE to determine the relative priority to be accorded to the filling of such vacancies without reference to either Department, provided it delivers the required overall reduction in numbers and the associated payroll savings, and meets the policy requirements in regard to service development posts and exempted grades outlined above.

It is the view of the Department of Health and Children that exceptions should be kept to the absolute minimum in order to achieve the target growth in exempted grades and support the transformation agenda. It is a matter for the HSE to deliver services, both nationally and locally, within its budget and overall health policy priorities. Understandably, the executive regrets any inconvenience or concern caused to patients and their families in this particular instance, and will obviously try to minimise this as far as possible.