Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin (Cavan-Monaghan, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 4: To ask the Taoiseach if it is proposed to redraft the programme for Government in view of the economic recession; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [7049/09]

Enda Kenny (Mayo, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 5: To ask the Taoiseach if the programme for Government is to be revised in view of the current economic circumstances; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8423/09]

Eamon Gilmore (Dún Laoghaire, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 6: To ask the Taoiseach if it is planned to make changes to the programme for Government having regard to the current economic situation and his announcement of 3 February 2009 regarding reductions in expenditure; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [9618/09]

Lucinda Creighton (Dublin South East, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 7: To ask the Taoiseach if the programme for Government will be revised or modified in view of the economic crisis; the elements that will not be implemented; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [9988/09]

Brian Cowen (Laois-Offaly, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

It is proposed to take Questions Nos. 4 to 7, inclusive, together.

The position is exactly as I outlined to the House on 18 February 2009 in reply to questions on the programme for Government. As its title suggests, the Programme for Government 2007-2012 is a programme of priorities to be delivered over a five-year period. Progress in delivering the programme is kept under review. On 24 September 2008, the Department of the Taoiseach website published statements regarding the progress made by Departments in implementing each of the commitments in the programme for Government.

On questions on this topic in the House on 18 February, I informed Deputy Gilmore, "The programme for Government is also predicated on balanced public finances and clearly, the crisis with which we are now contending means this is a major challenge and the top priority of any Government". With regard to the specific commitments in the programme for Government, I said that "the priorities are being reassessed by Ministers in the context of the budgets now available to them". We are now in the process of preparing for a supplementary budget, and this work is ongoing.

Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin (Cavan-Monaghan, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Bhí seans agam an cheist seo a chur cheana. An bhfoilseoidh an Rialtas clár nua? Is léir nach gcuirfear i bhfeidhm an chlár a tharraingíodh suas i 2007. Cad a bheidh in áit an chlár sin? An gcuirfidh an Rialtas clár leasuithe os comhair an Oireachtais?

The programme for Government includes commitments that are cost neutral. Can the Taoiseach advise the House which of these will proceed? At least let us examine the programme for Government to determine what exactly is being done to deliver on the commitments entered into between the parties comprising this new coalition. Does he not accept that a revised programme for Government is essential? He is coming forward with an additional budget for this year. In the same vein, a programme for Government drafted in the context of the 2007 general election clearly has not got the potential for delivery. It is a requirement that the programme be redrafted and brought before the Houses of the Oireachtas for debate. Will he fulfil that requirement?

Brian Cowen (Laois-Offaly, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

As I have stated on previous occasions, the work of the Government is focused on the issues of today in terms of dealing with the supplementary budget and setting out our priorities. I have made it clear that the programme for Government, which was predicated on a growth rate of 4% per annum, clearly cannot be fully implemented during the course of this term. It is obvious we are in a completely different situation from the one on which all parties based their programmes when they went to the people in 2007. Our programme was more conservative than most but the point is the situation has totally changed and every programme for Government contains within it the provision that all commitments are predicated on sustainable public finances. There is no point in suggesting these are free riding and unconditional in all respects or that in the event of 100% of a programme for Government not being implemented, one has failed to implement it. The programme for Government is couched on the basis of maintaining and upholding the public finance position because that is the only way one can have a sustainable position, whatever one is going to do.

That is the clear position of the programme for Government and we are consequently clarifying for the Opposition the areas in which we will proceed. On the basis of annual output statements and in the aftermath of budget debates, Ministers are able to go before committees to set out the issues and areas they intend to progress during a given year. In many cases, we will have to defer measures and will have to retrench in some areas because we are clearly in an unsustainable position. To critique the Government because all commitments in the programme for Government will not now be implemented is a very skewed reading of the programme because the Deputy is deciding to take out of the equation the fact that the public finance position is paramount in respect of all programmes for Government, be they ones I have negotiated in the past or ones I have sought to observe from the Opposition benches. Every programme for Government is based on that.

John O'Donoghue (Kerry South, Ceann Comhairle)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Tá súil agam go mbeidh seans agam teacht ar ais go dtí an Teachta Ó Caoláin.

Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin (Cavan-Monaghan, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Beidh tú ar ais.

Enda Kenny (Mayo, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Aontaím leis an méid a dúirt an Taoiseach faoi chostas an phlean seo. Tá a fhios ag gach éinne nach féidir é a chur i gcrích go hiomlán muna bhfuil struchtúr eacnamaíochta na tíre láidir go leor. Ba mhaith liom cúpla ceist a chur faoi moltaí agus polasaithe nach mbaineann costas ar bith leo. Mar shampla, is féidir linn athstruchtúrú a dhéanamh ar an chóras cheadúnais bus gan costas ar bith a chruthú. Tá sé sin sa phlean, ach níl nuacht ar bith faoi. Molaim gur chóir don Rialtas rud éigin a dhéanamh faoi truailliú torainn, nó noise pollution, agus faoi comhlachtaí bainistíochta, nó management companies. Níl costas ar bith ag baint leis na moltaí atá leagtha síos. Táimid ag feitheamh le reafrainn ar chearta leanaí. Tá an Teachta Shatter ar an gcoiste atá ag déileáil leis an ábhar sin. An mbeidh an reafrainn ar siúl in éineacht le toghchán ar bith? An bhfuil sé ar intinn ag an Rialtas moltaí agus cuspóirí a leagadh síos maidir le príosúnaigh? Tá sé sin sa phlean, ach níl scéal ar bith faoi ach oiread. Tá ceithre moltaí luaite agam. Níl costas ar bith ag baint leo. Is féidir leis an Rialtas iad a chur i gcrích gan an phlean a athrú, cé nach bhfuil cúrsaí eacnamaíochta na tíre ró-láidir.

The absent Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Deputy Gormley, who rarely comes in here, stated at the weekend that he wants to stay in Government because there is a national development programme to implement. I am not sure whether that is the reason he wants to stay in Government given that one would probably need a blow torch to remove Green Party Deputies from the seats to which they are welded in absentia. The Taoiseach made the realistic point that the economy is not going in the direction we would prefer and therefore the national development programme cannot be implemented as intended.

In February, I raised the question of restructuring the national development programme and made a number of proposals which are labour intensive but would not entail major costs. These proposals would employ Irish contractors and labourers, thereby giving people respect and opportunities to pay their taxes while at the same time constructing school buildings, primary health care centres and other facilities. The Taoiseach responded by saying the Government was working on the matter and that the broad estimate of the total number employed through the capital investment programme is 100,000 people. Has more work been done on the matter and will we see an analysis of how the national development programme can be rewritten to front load it with labour intensive projects that would get people back to work? In this day and age, people who are healthy, well educated and able to work should not be walking around or doing nothing. The Government should employ itself on this useful exercise.

Brian Cowen (Laois-Offaly, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Ar an gcéad dul síos, tá reachtaíocht á ullmhú ag na hAiríéagsúla maidir leis an chóras cheadúnais bus agus ná hábhair chomhshaoil eile a luaigh an Teachta. B'fhéidir go mbeadh an Teachta níos fearr as ceisteanna díreacha maidir leis an dul chun cinn atáá dhéanamh leis na polasaithe éagula a chur faoi bhráid na hAirí atá freagrach astu. B'fhéidir go gheobhadh sé freagraí níos cruinne.

Enda Kenny (Mayo, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Is tusa an boss. Ní thugann siad freagra ar bith dom.

Brian Cowen (Laois-Offaly, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Tugann siad, ach ní bhíonn an Teachta ag éisteacht.

Enda Kenny (Mayo, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Ní bhfaigheann na hAirí scéal ar bith óna Ranna fhéin. Ní bhíonn ann ach focail.

Brian Cowen (Laois-Offaly, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Bíonn an Teachta ag caint nuair atá siad ag freagairt.

Enda Kenny (Mayo, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Is é sin an fáth gur chuir mé ceist ar an Taoiseach.

Brian Cowen (Laois-Offaly, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Déanfaidh mé mo dhícheall.

Enda Kenny (Mayo, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Deireann siad gur cheart dom na nithe seo a ardú leis an Taoiseach.

Brian Cowen (Laois-Offaly, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

As the Deputy noted, clearly areas such as legislative change or issues which do not entail large costs can and should be progressed. I agree with that.

Two issues arise in regard to the question of prioritising capital investment programmes. We must concentrate on areas which give rise to social needs or economic returns. Our scarce resources must be concentrated on work that is strategically important in terms of enhancing the competitiveness of the economy so that we are in a position to take advantage of the upturn whenever it comes. As an export oriented and open country, we are dependent on a world economic recovery. We derive our wealth from what we sell abroad to a far greater extent than from what we produce and consume domestically due to the position of our economy, what we produce and where we spend and sell our products and services. It is therefore important that we use the recessionary period, during which there are scarcer resources, in a way that is focused on those priorities. That is not to say we are not mindful of providing labour intensive projects as well but the balance must be struck. We cannot just put in place projects which, when they are added up, do not provide the same economic rate of return as the more strategic work in transport, infrastructure or other necessary areas. Finalising our national motorway programme needs to be done and it would not make sense to divert money from that towards other areas that might be more labour intensive but would put at risk the major investment already made in the programme. We are in a position to complete it now at a time when outputs are far greater for the spend, given the more competitive tendering now available. There is no disagreement about finding that balance and there is a continuing high level of investment in overall terms of 5.3% this year in terms of capital spend.

In terms of the economic crisis and our financial position, we must be careful and see how we can maintain the capital programme and focus it on those areas that are strategically important. We must take advice from various State agencies that will ensure we support enterprise, improve competitiveness and continue to invest for the future while contending with the present difficulties.

Eamon Gilmore (Dún Laoghaire, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Is léir ón méid atá ráite ag an Taoiseach nach bhfuil an clár Rialtais beo faoi láthair agus nach féidir linn na bearta a bhí ann a chreidiúint anois. Ardaítear dhá fhadhb dá bharr sin. Tá an clár Rialtais tábhachtach mar is é sin an conradh idir na páirithe sa Rialtas. Níl a fhios againn anois cad é go díreach an conradh idir na páirithe sin ós rud é nach féidir iontaoibh a bheith againn as an chlár Rialtais. Ní féidir linn bheith ag súil le freagracht ón Rialtas nuair nach bhfuil clár Rialtais ann mar bhunús don fhreagracht sin.

Bhí an clár Rialtais bunaithe ar mhéadú 4.5% sa gheilleagar le linn saol an Rialtais ach is léir nach mbeidh an ráta sin ann. Cén figiúr a bhfuil an Rialtas ag obair air faoi láthair? Is dócha gur figiúr laghdaithe atá i gceist anois.

Baineann beart amháin sa chlár Rialtais le cúrsaí cánach. Mar a deir sé sa chlár: "Our first priority remains low and middle income earners — therefore our first task will be to use tax credits and bands to keep low income earners out of the standard rate band and average earners out of the higher band." An bhfuil sin mar pholasaí don Rialtas fós agus an mbeidh an polasaí sin mar bhunús don cháinfhaisnéis nua?

Brian Cowen (Laois-Offaly, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Tá a fhios ag an Teachta go bhfuil an ghéarchéim eacnamaíochta atá againn faoi láthair chomh tromchúiseach sin nach mbeimid in ann an córas cánach a bhí againn go dtí seo a fheabhsú mar a bhí muid in ann staid an ghnáthphobail a fheabhsú gach bliain le deich mbliain anuas. Ní féidir linn sin a dhéanamh as seo amach. Beidh athruithe ag teacht ó thaobh an córas cánach de. Níl cinneadh déanta ag an Rialtas go dtí seo, tá múid ag déanamdh scrúdú ar na roghanna atá againn agus beidh ar gach éinne fanacht go dtí an buiséad nua go bhfeicfimid na cinntí atá déanta againn. Tá an eacnamaíocht go ginearálta lag i mbliana, beidh laghdú 6.5% sa gheilleagar, nó níos mó b'fhéidir. Is géarchéim í seo nach bhfaca muid riamh sa tír seo.

The programme for Government was laid down on the basis of growth of 4.5%, which provided greater resources and, therefore, an ability to indicate further reforms and improvements in the tax area in addition to those already brought forward by successive Fianna Fáil-led Administrations since 1997. The new situation means we must look in the short and medium-term at sustainable systems of taxation for the country in the present circumstances that will be helpful for the investment climate, difficult as it may be, and that will allow us to compete for foreign direct investment while assisting indigenous industry.

The whole thrust of policy in the past was to minimise to the greatest extent possible tax on income, labour and business so we could ensure the greatest number of people possible could obtain work in our country. A great many did and got jobs commensurate with their talents and abilities. The situation has changed internationally and domestically and we must now see a way forward that broadens the tax base and ensures we raise sufficient funds to meet the requirements of basic public services.

The gap that has arisen, despite our low debt, is significant and must be closed. We have said many times that we tried to devise a taxation system based on the ability to pay, consistent with the promotion of enterprise, the maintenance of the maximum number of jobs and as fair a system as possible. That always has been our objective and the record of successive Fianna Fáil-led Governments has been exemplary in that respect. We must now look to see how we can reconfigure this in a way that will maintain jobs in the future.

This must be done against the background of a fragile economy and the swift change in our fortunes makes it all the more difficult. We cannot avoid the necessary adjustments if we are to fulfil our responsibilities, difficult as they may be for those privileged to be in Government at the moment.

I do not agree the programme for Government is irrelevant. The programme was based on different assumptions but through annual departmental statements and outputs, and debates on the budget, education or any other sector of the economy, Ministers can outline their priorities. Those priorities are the focus of debate because they must be addressed in the new circumstances in which we find ourselves. The Government's work is focused on getting this necessary work done. We have seen much work done in the first three months of the year in terms of the financial crisis and the legislative response to it and the need to provide for capitalisation. There has been much debate in the House on the emergency legislation that has been brought forward.

We will do whatever is required to meet the top priorities of the day. In this case it is our economic well-being. Those are the issues that must take precedence over all else. The Deputy is suggesting that the commitments in the programme for Government are meaningless, but they were conditional. I reiterate that all programme commitments of successive Governments were conditional. Any programme for Government worth the name has a budgetary parameter, without which it would be rendered meaningless.

Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin (Cavan-Monaghan, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The programme for Government contained a commitment to publish a national carers' strategy by the end of 2007. Does the Taoiseach accept that the decision last week not to publish such a strategy has had a serious effect on the 160,000 family carers throughout the State who are providing an essential support service to people who in other circumstances would cost the Exchequer untold millions of euro? Will the Taoiseach heed the call of carers' representative groups to develop and publish a national carers' strategy in line with the commitment in the programme for Government? In recognition of the current economic difficulties, will he also note that carer groups are asking the Government to deliver on the non-pay elements? The Taoiseach should accept that there is an onus of responsibility on the Government in this respect.

Brian Cowen (Laois-Offaly, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

At the outset, the Government made a commitment to social partners and carer representative groups that a national carers' strategy would not just be a paper exercise. The current economic situation has made it impossible to consider introducing any developments in services for carers at this time, beyond what we have been able to provide in recent years. There have been significant improvements in recent years. In that context, rather than publishing a document which does not include any significant plans for the future, it was considered that the best course of action would be not to publish a strategy at this time and to be open and honest with people who work in this area. I have a lot of admiration and respect for them. The Minister for Social and Family Affairs arranged meetings with representatives of carers groups in advance for that purpose.

Over the past ten years, support for carers has greatly increased. This year, the Department of Social and Family Affairs is providing some €650 million in payments to support carers. Over 45,000 people will receive a carer's allowance payment. That figure includes some 16,000 people who receive the half-rate carer's allowance in addition to another social welfare payment, which is a change I introduced as Minister for Finance. It was agreed with the late Séamus Brennan who was Minister for Social and Family Affairs at the time.

Over 51,400 carers received the annual respite grant of €17,000. The figure of 161,000 carers, which is frequently quoted — it was mentioned by Deputy Ó Caoláin — is from census returns and includes anyone providing a minimum of one hour's care per week. The numbers in receipt of carer's allowance or benefit and the respite care grant represent the vast majority of people providing full-time care.

The Department of Health and Children and the Health Service Executive, together with the Department of Social and Family Affairs, are committed to working with carers representative groups in the valuable work they do to support carers. The submissions received as part of the consultation process and the work carried out by the interdepartmental working group will inform our thinking in the future. In current circumstances, however, it is important to focus on maintaining the level of services we have been able to provide up to now in better times. These are far more difficult times.