Dáil debates

Wednesday, 25 October 2006

11:00 am

Photo of Bertie AhernBertie Ahern (Dublin Central, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

It is proposed to take No. 9, motion re statement of expenditure for Houses of the Oireachtas; No. 13, Energy (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2006, Report Stage (resumed) and Final Stage; No. 1, Europol (Amendment) Bill 2006 [Seanad] — Second Stage; and No. 2, Citizens Information Bill 2006 — Second Stage, resumed. It is proposed, notwithstanding anything in Standing Orders, that No. 9 shall be decided without debate. Private Members' business shall be No. 49, motion re health services, resumed, to conclude at 8.30 p.m.

Photo of Rory O'HanlonRory O'Hanlon (Cavan-Monaghan, Ceann Comhairle)
Link to this: Individually | In context

There is one proposal to put to the House. Is the proposal for dealing with No. 9, motion re statement of expenditure for Houses of the Oireachtas, agreed?

Photo of Enda KennyEnda Kenny (Mayo, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I understand from the Order Paper that this motion refers to expenditure from January next year until the end of December 2007, which is of interest to every Member of the House and the public. While one cannot have a discussion on how these moneys are spent, it might be in order to have an arrangement whereby we could discuss the commission's programme or receive a report from the commission on what it intends to do next year. This expenditure will affect matters such as printing facilities for Members and a range of other initiatives being taken to improve the efficiency of the House.

This issue should be related to the package for Dáil reform, which the Government Whip has been talking about for some time, to make the business of the House more efficient and relevant. Is it proposed to have a presentation on the commission's general programme for the moneys that will be spent between January and December 2007 or will the House bypass the matter and have others write about it when Members might have direct inputs to make?

Photo of Caoimhghín Ó CaoláinCaoimhghín Ó Caoláin (Cavan-Monaghan, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context

On the last occasion this proposition was before the House, I asked that we utilise the motion to have a proper review and discussion of the workings of the Houses of the Oireachtas Commission. I asked this not only on behalf of my party colleagues, but I hope I was reflecting the views of my colleagues in the Green Party and the members of the Technical Group. There is no direct representation of the Technical Group on the Houses of the Oireachtas Commission. This is a significant deficiency given that, collectively, we have a greater number of Members than one of the main Opposition parties. We have no direct voice on this commission. Proceeding once again without debate with a motion on the statement of expenditure for the forthcoming year is deficient. I therefore again ask that the proposal I put 12 months ago be revisited, reconsidered and, hopefully, acceded to.

Photo of Bertie AhernBertie Ahern (Dublin Central, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

There is a technical procedure to be followed on this matter. When the motion is agreed, the Secretary General must present the statement of Estimates to the Minister for Finance not later than 30 days before the preparation by the Minister for Dáil Éireann of the Estimates of receipts and expenditure, that is, the White Paper for this year. That White Paper is presented to the Dáil on 1 December. The statement of Estimates must be presented to the Minister not later than Tuesday, 31 October. With regard to a debate on the Estimates of the commission, that is a matter for the commission and the Whips. We must move the motion so we can comply with procedure to ensure we have resources next year. That is the issue I wish to address.

Photo of Rory O'HanlonRory O'Hanlon (Cavan-Monaghan, Ceann Comhairle)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Is the proposal agreed? Agreed.

Photo of Enda KennyEnda Kenny (Mayo, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Has the Taoiseach received any communication from the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs about reflecting the will of the people in law following a referendum conducted in respect of the name Daingean Uí Chúis or Dingle in County Kerry? There is a Private Members' Bill before the Seanad at present. The Minister has been saying this matter is illegal but it is important to make it legal. Has the Taoiseach received instructions from the Minister that there will be a positive response on this issue?

Second, will the Taoiseach respond to the claim this morning by Fr. Peter McVerry that young offenders in prison are being left to rot in a warehouse from sheer boredom——

Photo of Rory O'HanlonRory O'Hanlon (Cavan-Monaghan, Ceann Comhairle)
Link to this: Individually | In context

That does not arise on the Order of Business. The Deputy must find another way of raising it. It is a question for the line Minister.

Photo of Bertie AhernBertie Ahern (Dublin Central, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The Minister informs me that he has arranged a meeting with Kerry County Council in two weeks.

Photo of Bernard DurkanBernard Durkan (Kildare North, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Let Dingle dangle.

Photo of Enda KennyEnda Kenny (Mayo, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The Minister, Deputy Séamus Brennan, would have had that sorted out in ten minutes.

Photo of Pat RabbittePat Rabbitte (Dublin South West, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Does the Taoiseach anticipate a referendum being held arising from the St. Andrew's agreement?

Photo of Bertie AhernBertie Ahern (Dublin Central, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

It is too early to make a judgment on that matter. The position in the talks was that one party wanted to have an election. Other parties did not want an election or a referendum. If the issue came down to having to have an election — the larger parties would have the right to seek it and the other parties would accept that — and a larger party wanted it, I believe the two larger parties would accept that they would have an election. During the talks and discussions I argued that it is not necessary. If people insist that it is, it has its own difficulties but if there must be an election, we must have it.

An alternative suggested was that there could be a referendum. If there is a referendum, the issue is that it should be held on both parts of the island because that was the issue for the Good Friday Agreement in the first place. It will not be clear until the final legislative measures are cleared, if we get to that, hopefully on 21 November. It is too early to say what will happen. The main party is still insisting that it would prefer an election.

Photo of Trevor SargentTrevor Sargent (Dublin North, Green Party)
Link to this: Individually | In context

In reply to previous Leaders' Questions, the Taoiseach said we can expect legislation on the price of building land. Will there be an announcement of legislation in that regard? The Taoiseach said: "Fág an bealach, tá sé ag teacht." Can he indicate when that might be? With regard to legislation that is expected, Coillte and many others who are concerned about the environment and motorised vehicles going onto Coillte property, and I am not just referring to the huge construction lorries at Ballinaboy in County Mayo which are very contentious——

Photo of Rory O'HanlonRory O'Hanlon (Cavan-Monaghan, Ceann Comhairle)
Link to this: Individually | In context

What is the name of the legislation?

Photo of Trevor SargentTrevor Sargent (Dublin North, Green Party)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The forestry Bill. When will it be published?

Photo of Bertie AhernBertie Ahern (Dublin Central, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

With regard to the first question, work is continuing on those proposals. As regards the Forestry (Amendment) Bill, a comprehensive review of this sector, including potential legislative implications, commenced in the latter half of 2005. A consultative group representing all the stakeholders has concluded its evaluation and is to meet again shortly to finalise matters. If that happens, it is hoped the legislation will be ready next year.

Photo of David StantonDavid Stanton (Cork East, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

In the course of his musings recently, the Minister for Social and Family Affairs spoke about introducing legislation to curb high interest rates being charged by legal moneylenders. Is that legislation pending?

Photo of Bertie AhernBertie Ahern (Dublin Central, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

There is no legislation promised. The Minister said he is seeking advice from legal representatives and others as to what is possible on that matter.

Photo of Jim O'KeeffeJim O'Keeffe (Cork South West, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

He got his headline.

Photo of Tommy BroughanTommy Broughan (Dublin North East, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Will there be consequent legislation or a debate on the report of the three wise men about salmon in the next two weeks? It would give the Government backbenchers a chance to express their views on the report. Second, does the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources intend to introduce a tax on mobile phones?

Photo of Noel DempseyNoel Dempsey (Meath, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Is the Deputy suggesting it?

Photo of Bertie AhernBertie Ahern (Dublin Central, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

A debate on the report should be discussed by the Whips. It is a good report and would be worthy of discussion.

Photo of Caoimhghín Ó CaoláinCaoimhghín Ó Caoláin (Cavan-Monaghan, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The ground rents Bill has been promised since time immemorial and will, no doubt, appear in the Fianna Fáil election manifesto for the forthcoming general election. Where has the Bill been buried and when will it resurface? Will it ever be brought before the House? What is missing? Is it bottle? Let us deal with it.

Photo of Bertie AhernBertie Ahern (Dublin Central, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The Bill is not proceeding as present. A Supreme Court decision has implications for it.

Photo of Seymour CrawfordSeymour Crawford (Cavan-Monaghan, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

There was a Bill on the agenda for many years dealing with advertising alcohol to young people. It was removed from the agenda because the Taoiseach said he was working with the trade to try to deal with the situation.

Deputies:

A cosy deal.

Photo of Seymour CrawfordSeymour Crawford (Cavan-Monaghan, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Will he reconsider that decision in light of the tragic situations we regularly encounter? The sale of alcohol Bill is on the legislative programme but it specifically deals with the promotion of alcohol among sports organisations and so forth. Is the Government serious about trying to curtail the sale of alcohol to young people, given its implications?

Photo of Bertie AhernBertie Ahern (Dublin Central, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The heads of the sale of alcohol Bill, to codify the law on the sale and consumption of alcohol, have been approved and it was sent for drafting some time ago. It is due to be published in the spring session.

The heads of alcohol products (control of advertising, sponsorship and marketing practices/sales promotions) Bill have been approved. However, voluntary agreements were reached with the alcohol and advertising industries and the Department wishes to delay proceeding with the legislation for a period to see what will be the outcome of those agreements.

Photo of Seymour CrawfordSeymour Crawford (Cavan-Monaghan, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

How long more must we wait?

Photo of Bertie AhernBertie Ahern (Dublin Central, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The point is——

Photo of Seymour CrawfordSeymour Crawford (Cavan-Monaghan, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I do not raise this matter to be awkward.

Photo of Rory O'HanlonRory O'Hanlon (Cavan-Monaghan, Ceann Comhairle)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The Deputy should allow the Taoiseach to reply, without interruption.

Photo of Bertie AhernBertie Ahern (Dublin Central, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

——that if I honestly believed that passing legislation would solve all our problems, we would not bother with the code of practice. If we can encourage the industry to press forward with its advertising campaign which stresses people's responsibility, it would probably have far more effect. Young people are unlikely to read the various sections of the legislation as they engage in behaviour that is responsible or otherwise. It is worth making the effort to see if we can make progress on this issue. If the process to which I refer does not work, we will proceed with the Bill.

Photo of Enda KennyEnda Kenny (Mayo, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Will it be necessary to introduce legislation to give legal effect to the recommendations in the report on salmon drift net fishing that was published yesterday? Is the Taoiseach in a position to confirm that the sum of €25 million to which the report refers will be available for compensation in respect of currently licensed drift net fishermen?

Photo of Bertie AhernBertie Ahern (Dublin Central, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Legislation is not required in this regard. The Government will have to come to a decision on the other aspects of the report. The three wise men have indicated that we should not delay too long in respect of this issue because it is of major importance to the entire salmon industry.

Photo of Fergus O'DowdFergus O'Dowd (Louth, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

On the enforcement of fines Bill and in view of the fact that over €40 million remains uncollected from those who evaded car tax and that one in ten people do not tax their cars, will the Taoiseach introduce a mandatory requirement that people who do not tax their cars will, as is the case in the United Kingdom, be automatically fined?

Photo of Bertie AhernBertie Ahern (Dublin Central, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I do not have a date for the publication of the enforcement of fines Bill.

Photo of Billy TimminsBilly Timmins (Wicklow, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

When will the Curragh of Kildare Bill and the defence amendment Bill be published and taken in the House?

Photo of Bertie AhernBertie Ahern (Dublin Central, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Both are due to be published in this session.

Photo of Billy TimminsBilly Timmins (Wicklow, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Will they be taken in the House during this session?

Photo of Bertie AhernBertie Ahern (Dublin Central, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

That depends on time constraints. Both should be published this session.