Ken O'Flynn (Cork North-Central, Independent Ireland Party)
Link to this: Individually | In context

241. To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality if his Department has commissioned or received any risk assessment concerning Chinese intelligence or influence operations within the State, particularly regarding the immigrant investor programme, foreign-linked lobbying or contact with public officials; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55932/25]

Ken O'Flynn (Cork North-Central, Independent Ireland Party)
Link to this: Individually | In context

243. To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality if he will outline the measures in place to ensure that individuals associated with foreign intelligence or influence entities are not granted residency, citizenship or investor visas in Ireland; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55934/25]

Ken O'Flynn (Cork North-Central, Independent Ireland Party)
Link to this: Individually | In context

244. To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality if his Department has reviewed past decisions made under the immigrant investor programme to determine whether any approvals involved individuals now known to have links to Chinese intelligence or influence bodies; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55935/25]

Jim O'Callaghan (Dublin Bay South, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I propose to take Questions Nos. 241, 243 and 244 together.

I can assure the Deputy that my Department takes seriously any evidence of hostile state activity, including efforts by other states to exert influence or impede on our national interest.

Ireland, like any other democratic state, is not immune from the risk posed by espionage or other activities aimed at compromising the security of the State. Our security services take all appropriate measures to counteract potential threats.

As Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration, I am regularly briefed by the Garda Commissioner and by my officials on security matters.

The Deputy will appreciate that, for sound reasons, it is not the practice to comment on security matters nor would it be in the public interest to do so.