Written answers

Thursday, 3 July 2025

Department of Justice and Equality

Freedom of Speech

Photo of Paul MurphyPaul Murphy (Dublin South West, Solidarity)
Link to this: Individually | In context

22. To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality if he is concerned at the chilling effect the proposed Criminal Justice (Terrorist Offences) (Amendment) Bill 2025 will have on the right to protest; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36518/25]

Photo of Jim O'CallaghanJim O'Callaghan (Dublin Bay South, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

In Ireland, the right to freely and peacefully assemble and associate, and correspondingly, to freely express one’s convictions and opinions, is guaranteed under the Constitution, the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights. These are core tenets of any open, liberal democracy, and this Government is committed to their protection.

Notwithstanding that, there are boundaries to such protections, and as the nature of terrorism continues to evolve and adapt, we must ensure that our counter-terrorism laws are robust and fit for purpose in the face of modern terrorist threats. The Criminal Justice (Terrorist Offences) (Amendment) Bill 2025 seeks to achieve that aim. As the Deputy will be aware, the Bill transposes an EU Directive from 2017.

Great care has been taken to ensure that where the offences introduced by the Bill place limits on fundamental rights, it is done proportionately and out of necessity. One such safeguard woven into the tapestry of this Bill is the notion of terrorist intention, which, in this jurisdiction, is an essential requirement for a person to fall within the scope of any of the offences.

Take section 3 of the Bill by way of example, which widens the definition of the existing offence of “public provocation to commit a terrorist offence” to reflect that this may be committed through glorification of a terrorist activity. A number of hurdles must be met for the prosecution of this offence. It will be necessary to prove that on distribution or publication of terrorist content, the person intended to incite another person to commit a terrorist activity. There must also be a reasonable apprehension that the commission of a terrorist activity could in fact result.

This high standard of proof serves to act as a safeguard in ensuring that it is only those who set about to deliberately incite terrorist activity that are captured by the offences contained in this Bill.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.