Written answers

Tuesday, 17 June 2025

Department of Education and Skills

Departmental Data

Photo of Donna McGettiganDonna McGettigan (Clare, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context

973. To ask the Minister for Education and Skills for detailed information on the six further education building projects marked as output targets for 2025; the reason there were no building projects planned for the years 2023 and 2024; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [32586/25]

Photo of James LawlessJames Lawless (Kildare North, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I wish to advise that the six further education and training projects referred to by the Deputy are being progressing under my Department’s Further Education and Training (FET) Strategic Infrastructure Upgrade Fund (SIUF). The projects are as follows:

  1. Donegal ETB: Stranorlar FET Centre, Co. Donegal,
  2. Galway Roscommon ETB: Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) HUB, Galway City,
  3. Kilkenny Carlow ETB: Grennan College Equestrian Centre, Co. Kilkenny,
  4. Louth Meath ETB: Drogheda Institute of Further Education, Co. Louth,
  5. Mayo Sligo Leitrim ETB: Mohill FET Centre, Co. Leitrim,
  6. Tipperary ETB: Carrick on Suir FET Centre, Co. Tipperary.
The Strategic Infrastructure Upgrade Fund (SIUF) was a programme call issued in February 2022 to support smaller-scale investments in existing FET infrastructure. The six SIUF projects, listed, progressed sufficiently to be marked as output targets for 2025.

The NDP provided, for the first time, a dedicated capital envelope amounting to €300m over the decade 2018-2027. Available funding increased from €5.5m in 2018 to the current allocation of €106.5m for 2025. The FET indicator is therefore new and, in that context, the values for 2023/2024 were required to be set at zero.

Photo of Donna McGettiganDonna McGettigan (Clare, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context

974. To ask the Minister for Education and Skills the plans his Department has in addressing the numbers of SOLAS beneficiaries on training courses for those seeking employment, which significantly decreased from 78,502 in 2021 to 64,426 in 2022, in tabular form for the years 2023, 2024 and 2025; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [32587/25]

Photo of James LawlessJames Lawless (Kildare North, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

My officials are in the process of obtaining the requested information from SOLAS and will forward a response to the Deputy separately.

Photo of Donna McGettiganDonna McGettigan (Clare, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context

975. To ask the Minister for Education and Skills the plans his Department has to address the shortage and dramatic decrease of QQI-registered further education and training providers from 345 in 2021, 317 in 2022 and just 176 in 2023; to provide updated details for 2024 and 2025, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [32588/25]

Photo of Donna McGettiganDonna McGettigan (Clare, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context

976. To ask the Minister for Education and Skills the plans his Department has to address the shortage and dramatic decrease of the number of QQI-registered further education and training providers that issued certification/certificates within the years 2021 (251), 2022 (216) and 2023 (169); if he will provide updated details on certification numbers for 2024 and 2025, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [32589/25]

Photo of James LawlessJames Lawless (Kildare North, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I propose to take questions 975 and 976 together.

The Qualifications and Quality Assurance (Education and Training) Act 2012 requires providers of further education and training (FET) seeking to offer programmes leading to awards validated by Quality and Qualifications Ireland (QQI) to prepare quality assurance procedures for approval by QQI. The Act provided for continuity of quality assurance services and awards for legacy providers engaged with QQI's predecessor agencies [including the Further Education and Training Awards Council (FETAC)] until such time as revised quality assurance procedures had been submitted to QQI for approval. For this group of providers, this process was termed "re-engagement".

QQI adopted a risk-based approach to scheduling re-engagement, with smaller providers scheduled later in the process. Some providers elected not to reengage due to various business factors. Others entered into arrangements with other approved providers (such as Education and Training Boards) and continue to operate within the quality assurance framework of those providers. Following the conclusion of the re-engagement process, the number of FET providers has remained relatively stable. In parallel, there has been an increase in the number of FET awards made.

Please see relevant details outlined in the attached document.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.