Written answers
Tuesday, 15 October 2024
Department of Employment Affairs and Social Protection
Budget 2025
Jim O'Callaghan (Dublin Bay South, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
422. To ask the Minister for Employment Affairs and Social Protection further to Parliamentary Question No. 325 of 8 October 2024, which made no mention of percentages but sought information as to actual numbers of recipients, if she could provide the information sought in the original question. [41614/24]
Heather Humphreys (Cavan-Monaghan, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The €200 living alone allowance lump sum to be implemented in November 2024 will benefit an estimated 250,000 social welfare recipients.
As this is a future payment, it is only possible to provide estimated numbers for the recipients of this payment at county level, as current recipients may change their underlying payment, close their claims, change address, or have other changes in circumstances.
The distribution of the anticipated 250,000 beneficiaries of the lump sums by approximate county breakdown, is shown in the table below. These figures are approximate and are expected to change once payment schedules have been finalised immediately prior to the payments issuing.
County | Anticipated share of the estimated 250,000 recipients | Estimated number of recipients |
---|---|---|
Carlow | 1% | 3,200 |
Cavan | 2% | 4,000 |
Clare | 3% | 7,100 |
Cork | 11% | 28,300 |
Donegal | 4% | 9,600 |
Dublin | 22% | 57,000 |
Galway | 5% | 13,000 |
Kerry | 4% | 9,400 |
Kildare | 3% | 8,100 |
Kilkenny | 2% | 4,800 |
Laois | 2% | 3,800 |
Leitrim | 1% | 2,400 |
Limerick | 4% | 10,700 |
Longford | 1% | 2,600 |
Louth | 3% | 6,400 |
Mayo | 4% | 8,800 |
Meath | 3% | 7,200 |
Monaghan | 1% | 3,400 |
Offaly | 2% | 3,800 |
Roscommon | 2% | 4,200 |
Sligo | 2% | 4,300 |
Tipperary | 4% | 10,100 |
Unknown | 2% | 6,100 |
Waterford | 3% | 7,000 |
Westmeath | 2% | 4,600 |
Wexford | 4% | 8,800 |
Wicklow | 3% | 6,600 |
Pearse Doherty (Donegal, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
423. To ask the Minister for Employment Affairs and Social Protection further to Parliamentary Question No. 342 of 8 October 2024, to confirm that the high scenario cost estimate of €2 billion is based on 201,600 carers (70% of those who self-reported in Census 2022) being eligible for carer’s allowance in the absence of the means test; and if not, the number the high scenario is based on. [41646/24]
Pearse Doherty (Donegal, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
424. To ask the Minister for Employment Affairs and Social Protection further to Parliamentary Question No. 342 of 8 October 2024, to confirm that the high scenario cost estimate of €2 billion is the resulting total cost of the carer’s allowance scheme if the removal of the means-test resulted in 70% of self-reports in the Census 2022 carers being eligible for carer’s allowance and to provide the additional cost (in numbers of millions) of the high scenario once the 'no policy change' estimated expenditure on the carer’s allowance scheme is subtracted. [41647/24]
Heather Humphreys (Cavan-Monaghan, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I propose to take Questions Nos. 423 and 424 together.
For the costing the Deputy is referencing, data from the 2022 Census was used. In Census 2022, approximately 290,000 people over 19 years of age self-reported as carers. The Deputy is correct in saying that the number of carers estimated as being eligible for Carer's Allowance under the 'High Scenario' for this costing was 201,600.
There are a number of reasonable scenarios that could be used when attempting to estimate the cost range of abolishing the Carer's Allowance means test. These approaches include using administrative data from the Department, Census data, or estimates from representative bodies such as Family Carers Ireland.
The costing referenced by the Deputy is not based on extrapolating from the number of current recipients and, as such, it is not clear how the additional cost can be identified under a 'no policy change' scenario. There is no way to identify current recipients of Carer's Allowance as they appear in the Census statistics produced by the Central Statistics Office.
I hope this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.
No comments