Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

166. To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality if her attention has been drawn to a judgment (details supplied); her plans to develop legislation and or consult with the Law Reform Commission in respect of an aspect of the judgement; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [33197/22]

Helen McEntee (Meath East, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

At the outset, I want to record my sympathy for all those affected by issues arising from CervicalCheck. I have previously met with the 221+ Patient Support Groups and they explained their concerns to me in relation to a number of matters, including issues raised by the Morrissey v HSE case relating to the Civil Liability Act 1961.

In the Morrissey v HSE case, the Supreme Court held that the dependents of a plaintiff who has brought an action for personal injury cannot, while the plaintiff is still alive, claim for the future loss of services which the plaintiff might have been expected to provide for his or her family. The Court stated that if the law in this area is to be changed, it would have to be done by way of legislation, rather than by an evolution in the case-law.

A personal injury action may be brought by an injured person, or a wrongful death action may be brought under section 48 of the Civil Liability Act 1961 by his or her dependents after his or her death, but it is not possible for both of these actions to be brought arising from the same wrongful act.

These issues are under ongoing examination within my Department.