Written answers

Tuesday, 10 December 2019

Department of Education and Skills

DEIS Review

Photo of Thomas ByrneThomas Byrne (Meath East, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

202. To ask the Minister for Education and Skills the status of an ongoing review of the DEIS support scheme. [51475/19]

Photo of Joe McHughJoe McHugh (Donegal, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

As the Deputy is aware, following the review of DEIS, my Department introduced an objective, statistics based model for assessing which schools merited inclusion in the DEIS Programme.

All schools at both Primary and Post Primary level are being assessed using this new methodology based on their enrolments from 2018/19 and the latest data available from Census 2016 under the HP Deprivation Index. The accuracy of address data is vital to this process and an Eircode lookup function was added to the Primary and Post Primary Online Databases earlier this year to facilitate this.

Following a detailed analysis of the quality of the data, my Department is now in the final stages of further data analysis on the new identification model to allow for the development of a resource allocation model to match resources to identified need. This analysis is being carried out by members of the DEIS Technical Group which contains representatives of the Department’s Statistics and Social Inclusion Units, the Inspectorate and the Educational Research Centre. The work of this group is at an advanced stage and a consultation process with the relevant stakeholders will follow.

I am confident that the culmination of this analysis will facilitate the ultimate aim of matching resources to identified need and will allow us to target extra resources at those schools most in need. Until this analysis is complete, it is not intended to extend the DEIS programme to any further schools.

Photo of Thomas ByrneThomas Byrne (Meath East, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

203. To ask the Minister for Education and Skills if the ongoing review of the DEIS scheme will take into account issues identified in the measuring of literacy and numeracy by educational research centres in previous analyses; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [51476/19]

Photo of Joe McHughJoe McHugh (Donegal, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

The Educational Research Centre (ERC) administers the OECD’s Programme for International Assessment (PISA) in nationally representative samples of students aged 15. The study is conducted every three years since 2000, and assesses reading literacy, mathematics and science. The ERC identified an error in the course of a review of PISA 2015 data.

The error referred to by the Deputy involved the ERC using the wrong indicator variable to compare students in DEIS and non-DEIS schools in PISA 2015 national reporting. The PISA 2015 national report and its accompanying e-Appendix were published by the ERC in December 2016.

As a result of this error, the published analyses in the PISA 2015 national report, that compare students in DEIS and non-DEIS schools were incorrect. The ERC has recently published the corrected data. While the improvements are somewhat less than previously reported, nevertheless the revised figures still represent improvements on the equivalent data for 2012.

A second consequence of this error was that the post-primary literacy and numeracy targets in the DEIS Plan and in the Interim Literacy and Numeracy Strategy Review document, which are based on PISA proficiency levels, were incorrect. The figures should have presented a lower baseline of achievement than what was published at the time.

My Department has noted the errors and the corrected data now published by the ERC. The ERC has confirmed to my Department that the error related only to one variable indicator, and that no other analysis carried out by it for my Department is affected. The ERC has also confirmed that it is in the process of a broader internal review of its data management processes to mitigate the recurrence of such an error.

In relation to Literacy and Numeracy, and DEIS, the original targets were published in 2017.

The Deputy will be aware the findings from PISA 2018 were published in early December and show that Irish students in Ireland scored higher than the OECD average in reading, mathematics and science.

Consideration is being given to the development of new targets taking into account the outcome of the 2018 PISA report and the corrected baseline of achievement in 2015 that the ERC has now published in relation to DEIS schools.

Evaluation is a key element of the DEIS Programme and PISA findings are considered part of the ongoing evaluation of DEIS. Aside from PISA, there are a number of mechanisms of evaluation of DEIS schools.

Since DEIS was first introduced, the Educational Research Centre (ERC) and my Department’s Inspectorate have conducted a series of evaluations on aspects of the programme and findings of this work are contained in a series of published reports. Evidence from this research to date demonstrates that the DEIS programme is having a positive effect on tackling educational disadvantage and is succeeding in improving educational outcomes.

The Educational Research Centre has also been involved in implementing and reporting on National Assessments of ‎Mathematics and English Reading (NAMER) on behalf of my Department. Since 2009 NAMER assesses primary pupils in English Reading and Maths at the end of Second and Sixth ‎classes, to coincide with the end of the Junior and Senior cycles at primary level. The ninth NAMER takes place in the spring of 2020 in a nationally representative sample of schools. One of the objectives of this assessment cycle is to evaluate progress towards the revised targets identified after NAMER 2014. NAMER 2020 will incorporate an increased sample of DEIS schools in order to compare the achievements of pupils in non-DEIS and DEIS schools.


No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.