Written answers
Tuesday, 22 May 2018
Department of Education and Skills
Compensation Schemes
Maurice Quinlivan (Limerick City, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
248. To ask the Minister for Education and Skills if, in cases of historical sexual abuse in which a prior complaint cannot be established but the perpetrator has been convicted of the crime, survivors of this abuse will be compensated; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22714/18]
Richard Bruton (Dublin Bay North, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Widening the parameters of the ex-gratia scheme introduced following the ECtHR judgment in the Louise O'Keeffe case to include cases where there was no prior complaint but there was a criminal conviction has been examined.
Such an approach would unfairly discriminate against those who were abused but whose abusers were not convicted (e.g., due to no complaint, level of response to the complaint, investigation of the complaint, a decision not to prosecute or acquittal in Court).
In addition, the fact that there was a criminal conviction, while it might provide evidence of abuse, does not of itself provide a causal connection to a failure to act on the part of the State.
There is consistent legal advice that the State's interpretation of the ECtHR judgement in the Louise O'Keeffe case is legally sound and in keeping with that judgement.
No comments