Written answers

Thursday, 19 April 2018

Photo of Michael McGrathMichael McGrath (Cork South Central, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

128. To ask the Minister for Finance the number of applications for tax relief certificates under the employment and investment incentive scheme, EIIS, in each year since its creation and in each month of 2018; the number of applications awaiting processing and approval by the Revenue Commissioners; the average time taken between original application and the final approval for tax relief certificates under the EIIS in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17299/18]

Photo of Michael McGrathMichael McGrath (Cork South Central, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

129. To ask the Minister for Finance the number of outstanding applications for tax relief certificates under the EIIS awaiting processing and approval by the Revenue Commissioners at the end of each month in each of the years 2016 to 2017 and to date in 2018, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17300/18]

Photo of Paschal DonohoePaschal Donohoe (Dublin Central, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I propose to take Questions Nos. 128 and 129 together.

Employment and Investment Incentive (EII) relief is granted in two tranches: the first portion of the relief (currently 30/40 and previously 30/41) is given at the time of investment (on foot of a completed Form EII 1), while the second portion (currently 10/40 and previously 11/41) is given if, after 3 years, the company has increased employment or spent all of the money on qualifying research and development (Form EII 1A). 

Revenue advise that the increased complexity of the scheme, arising from changes in Finance Act 2015 and 2017, means that each application takes longer to process than in previous years.  The increased complexity also results in a large number of incomplete applications being made, which in turn increases the volume of correspondence dealt with by the processing team.

The figures in relation to the number of initial applications for the incentive are set out in tables 1 and 2.

Table 1: No. of initial applications for EII Certification 2012 – 2017

YEARQUALIFYING COMPANIESNO. OF INVESTORS
201278352
20131901,028
20142391,395
20152791,530
20162611,768
2017 *2731,455

* Please note that the 2017 figures are provisional and subject to change. The analysis of those 2017 applications still waiting to be processed is not yet complete.

Table 2: No. of Applications for EII Certification 2018

MONTHQUALIFYING COMPANIES
January11
February13
March12

* The number of 2018 investors is not currently available as the analysis of these applications is not yet complete.

The number of initial applications for certificates under the EII currently awaiting processing is 133 (i.e. initial applications where no processing has yet taken place). As such, this figure excludes cases where taxpayers have been asked to provide additional information but have not yet done so.

I am advised that it is not possible to give an average time taken to issue a decision regarding approval or rejection. Where a full application, with all supporting documentation, is received a decision will issue more quickly than a case where additional information and clarifications must be sought.  Equally, it takes less time to carry out the level of examination required in respect of a claim by a company with a simple corporate structure than a claim in respect of a complex corporate grouping.  At present, in respect of the more complex cases, it can take up to six months for a reply to issue.

The figures requested by the Deputy in relation to the number of outstanding applications by month since January 2016, are set out in tables 3, 4 and 5.  These figures include both EII 1 and EII 1A certifications.

I am further advised by Revenue that figures prior to August 2017 represent unworked items only (i.e. where no processing has yet taken place), while those after August 2017 include items in respect of which a final answer has not yet issued.  Therefore, a file was not identified as outstanding in July 2017 where correspondence was sent to a taxpayer requesting more information and that information was still awaited at the end of the month.  That file, from August 2017, is identified as an outstanding work item.  These changes in the recording of the statistics, which allowed for a more accurate representation of the level of the work outstanding, account for the large spike in the numbers in the latter part of 2017.  While it is not possible to split the August 2017 to December 2017 figures into cases worked and cases closed, this information has been collated for the first three months of 2018.

Table 3: 2016 Total Applications O/S By Month

MONTHNUMBER O/S
January29
February50
March43
April29
May18
June26
July18
August28
September38
October65
November34
December35

Table 4: 2017 Total Applications O/S By Month

MONTHNUMBER O/S
January59
February52
March84
April98
May76
June49
July88
August164
September186
October277
November189
December187

Table 5: 2018 Total Applications O/S By Month

MONTHOpeningReceivedClosedNUMBER O/SOf which additional information was requested in the month
January18711918957
February189131418860
March188122018062

It should be noted that the figure above of 180 cases outstanding as of March 2018 relates to both initial applications as well as follow-on case work.

Finally, and as the Deputy will be aware, I announced that a review of EII will be carried out this year. I expect that the review will be completed ahead of Budget 2019.  The review will, among other matters, consider operational aspects of the scheme.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.