Written answers

Thursday, 16 November 2017

Department of Finance

Revenue Commissioners Enforcement Activity

Photo of Michael McGrathMichael McGrath (Cork South Central, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

67. To ask the Minister for Finance the amount collected by the Revenue Commissioners under the compliance initiative announced in budget 2017; the interest and penalties that have been applied, in aggregate form; the number of disclosures that were made in respect of each offshore jurisdiction; the nature of the tax evasion captured by the initiative, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48644/17]

Photo of Paschal DonohoePaschal Donohoe (Dublin Central, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

It was announced to the House in the Financial Statement for Budget 2017 that action would be taken to restrict, with effect from May 2017, the opportunity for tax defaulters with outstanding tax liabilities in respect of offshore matters to use the voluntary disclosure regime. In line with this undertaking, section 56 of the Finance Act 2016 provides that, as and from the specified deadline date, the making of a voluntary disclosure is no longer permitted where the tax liabilities in question relate to offshore matters. 

The period during which a voluntary disclosure could be made to Revenue in relation to offshore matters ended on 4 May 2017. I am advised by Revenue that some 2,734 disclosures, with a declared value of almost €84 million, were received by that date. This amount is comprised of €53 million in tax, interest of €25 million and €6 million in penalties.

I am advised also that 1,888 (that is, 69 percent) of the disclosures received by Revenue relate to offshore matters concerning four jurisdictions, namely the United Kingdom (1,196), the United States of America (377), France (183) and Spain (132). A full breakdown of the disclosures received, by reference to the jurisdiction to which the offshore matter disclosed related, is given in the following table.

BREAKDOWN BY JURISDICTION TO WHICH OFFSHORE MATTER RELATES

CountryNo. of DisclosuresCountryNo. of DisclosuresCountryNo. of Disclosures
Australia53Gibraltar1Oman1
Austria7United Kingdom1,196Panama1
Bahamas4Greece1Poland26
Barbados1Guernsey5Portugal51
Belgium25Hungary43Romania4
Belize1India5Saint Lucia1
Bermuda1Iraq1Singapore2
Brazil1Isle of Man38Slovakia3
British Virgin Islands5Italy10Slovenia1
Bulgaria18Jersey27South Africa30
Cambodia1Jamaica1Spain132
Canada39Kenya2Sri Lanka1
Cape Verde1Lebanon1Sweden5
Cayman Islands1Liechtenstein3Switzerland47
China4Lithuania3Thailand1
Croatia1Luxembourg30Trinidad & Tobago1
Cyprus9Malaysia1Turkey18
Czech Republic4Malta2United Arab Emirates17
Denmark1Mauritius1USA377
Estonia1Monaco1Unspecified178
Finland4Netherlands21
France183New Zealand10
Germany64Norway5Total2,734

The following table gives details, by category, of the types of previously undisclosed income sources and assets that gave rise to the disclosures made to Revenue.

BREAKDOWN BY SOURCE OF INCOME AND ASSETS

Source NumberPercentage
Pension42816%
Bank Account47117%
Shares55520%
Property79529%
Offshore Fund1174%
Trust241%
Earned Income753%
Inheritance241%
Multiple1134%
Unspecified1325%
Total2,734

Anybody who had tax liabilities relating to offshore matters and who did not act by 4 May to address them now faces the prospect of substantially higher penalties, publication in Revenue’s quarterly list of tax defaulters and possible prosecution. Revenue will be making full and effective use of the large volume of data that it is receiving, under international arrangements for the automatic exchange of information, to identify and pursue anybody who attempts to evade his or her tax obligations by using offshore accounts, assets or structures.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.