Written answers

Wednesday, 25 October 2017

Department of Justice and Equality

Deportation Orders

Photo of Bríd SmithBríd Smith (Dublin South Central, People Before Profit Alliance)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

181. To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality if his attention has been drawn to the fact that asylum seekers with diagnosed mental illnesses are being or are about to be deported from the State; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45205/17]

Photo of Bríd SmithBríd Smith (Dublin South Central, People Before Profit Alliance)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

183. To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality his views on the number of persons unsuccessful in their asylum applications and are to be deported to countries in which they may not receive adequate care and medication for severe diagnosed mental illnesses and life threatening physical illnesses; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45207/17]

Photo of Charles FlanaganCharles Flanagan (Laois, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I propose to take Questions Nos. 181 and 183 together.

International Protection decisions are taken pursuant to the provisions the International Protection Act, 2015.

I am advised by the Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service (INIS) of my Department that applicants for protection under the International Protection Act 2015 are considered by the International Protection Office (IPO). It is the policy of that Office to ensure that the special needs of vulnerable applicants are addressed at each stage of the investigation and determination process in that office. This includes when an application for international protection is first made and subsequently at the interview and investigation stages.

Extensive training is provided to staff in the IPO known as international protection officers for this purpose many of whom worked in the former Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner. Training programmes have been developed in conjunction with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in line with international best practice.

Under section 15 of the International Protection Act 2015, an applicant is instructed to set out all information that would be relevant in the event that they are refused Refugee Status and Subsidiary Protection and are seeking permission to remain in the state under section 49 of the Act.

If an applicant is not granted a permission to remain at first instance an applicant can put forward any further information, including humanitarian considerations, that they would like the Minister to take into account that becomes relevant and this will be reviewed by an officer of the Minister before a Deportation Order is made.

In respect of applicants who had their Asylum / Subsidiary Protection applications dealt with prior to commencement of the Act, these are considered under section 3 of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended), on whether or not to make a Deportation Order. Cases must be considered under all of the headings set out in section 3(6) of the Act, including: the age of the person, the duration of their residence in the State, the person's family and domestic circumstances, the nature of the person's connection(s) with the State, their employment record and employment prospects, their character and conduct, including any criminal convictions, the representations, if any, made by or on behalf of the person, considerations of national security and public policy and any humanitarian issues advanced in support of the case to remain in the State.

A refoulement consideration must also be carried out. This is an assessment of the safety of returning that person to their country of origin or place of former habitual residence having regard for the political and human rights conditions prevailing in that country at that point in time. This consideration will require the relevant applicant's claims in this regard to be examined against relevant, up to date, information, from reputable sources, relating to the conditions prevailing in the relevant country of origin. Clearly, no person can be returned to their country of origin, or their place of former habitual residence, where there is a credible risk to their life or freedom.

Consideration must also be given to that person's rights to a private and a family life, as provided for under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

In addition to all of the above factors, I am advised that in circumstances where a person advances medically based reasons for not wishing to return to their country of origin, or their place of former habitual residence, any such issues must also be examined having regard for the provisions of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Only after all of these matters have been considered, and the appropriate evidence based conclusions drawn, can a decision to deport be made either under the International Protection Act 2015 or the 1999 Immigration Act.

The Deputy can be assured that all matters advanced by a person facing deportation are considered in detail before the ultimate decision, to deport or not to deport, is taken. In circumstances where a decision is taken to not make a Deportation Order then, all other things being equal, that person will be granted permission to remain in the State.

Photo of Bríd SmithBríd Smith (Dublin South Central, People Before Profit Alliance)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

182. To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality the process that sees persons with deportation orders who have been diagnosed with mental illnesses and life-threatening physical illnesses being evicted from and invited to leave direct provision centres and that are therefore at great risk of becoming homeless. [45206/17]

Photo of David StantonDavid Stanton (Cork East, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

It is important that a clear distinction is made between those who are seeking International Protection and those who, after having exhausted all due process, are issued with a Deportation Order, and by law are obliged to remove themselves from the State.

RIA accommodation is offered to those in the protection process (‘asylum seekers’) and it is up to each applicant if they wish to take up this offer. Many choose not to, opting to stay with family or friends or have independent means to support themselves. When a final decision is made on an application, a person is either granted permission to remain in Ireland or refused that permission.

For those with leave to remain in the State, we are working with the NGO community, housing agencies, local authorities and religious groups to provide assistance to move into permanent accommodation in communities around Ireland. People who wish to make offers of accommodation to such persons should do so through the Irish Red Cross who are handling this matter on behalf of the Department of Justice and Equality.

On the other hand, it is incumbent on those with deportation orders to remove themselves from the State. It is an integral part of the immigration regime of all developed States that those who have been given due process and have been determined to have no right to be in the State should remove themselves, or if failing to do so be removed by the appropriate authorities. A Deportation Order arises after an extensive process where applicants have every opportunity to present their claim for asylum or other types of leave to remain, including various appeal stages. This is the final step and most people voluntarily comply with the Deportation Order. In that context, it is unreasonable to expect that persons with Deportation Orders can continue in State provided accommodation indefinitely.

Continuing to allocate limited accommodation to people who are legally obliged to remove themselves from the State would undermine our laws and adversely impact our capacity to assist those who are seeking refugee status. At current rate of demand, accommodation capacity in the Centres will run out for all applicants within a number of weeks unless remedial action is taken. In order to meet our international obligations, we must apply the law and we must do so in a fair and transparent way. It will become increasingly difficult to meet the needs of those seeking international protection if those who have exhausted every legal avenue and been found not to qualify remain in the State and in accommodation provided by the State.

The engagement by RIA is to progress matters, to reach mutual agreement in cases where persons continue to reside in RIA for extended periods. Obviously, full consideration is given to each case taking all aspects of each situation into account. People who have leave to remain or have been issued with a deportation order can no longer be considered to be asylum seekers and are reminded that they need to arrange to leave state provided accommodation as they are no longer entitled to reside in accommodation that is provided solely for those in the protection process. This in no way should be considered as an eviction process.

In the final analysis the State meets all its international obligations, including to meet the needs (i.e. full bed and board including all utilities, welfare payments, medical facilities, etc.) of those in the protection process and ensure that full and due process is afforded to those seeking protection, as well as follow-up on the outcomes of that process.

If a person requires assistance to comply with a Deportation Order, they may contact the Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service who will assist them in that process.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.