Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

138. To ask the Minister for Education and Skills the status of plans to provide additional classrooms at a school (details supplied); if prefabs are likely to be required; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12220/17]

Richard Bruton (Dublin Bay North, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I wish to advise the Deputy that the primary school in question is recognised as a single stream school and is expected to continue operating at this level. There is no requirement therefore for additional classrooms.  

The Deputy will be aware that the school building in which the primary school is accommodated is also hosting a new post primary school during its start-up years. In that regard, it is my Department's intention to construct a new school building for the post-primary school and architectural planning to deliver the building project concerned has commenced. 

Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

139. To ask the Minister for Education and Skills if approval will be given to proceed with the classrooms in advance of a hall for a school (details supplied); if his attention has been drawn to the fact that prefabs are currently costing €40,000 per annum; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12222/17]

Richard Bruton (Dublin Bay North, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

In March 2015 my Department approved a devolved grant for the provision of two mainstream classrooms with en-suite toilets and the conversion of an existing classroom to a multi-purpose room at the school to which the Deputy refers.

The School subsequently submitted an application for funding for a GP room which the school said it would co-fund.  In the circumstances, the Department agreed to make a contribution towards the provision of a GP room in addition to the accommodation already approved. 

The Board of Management submitted documentation in December 2016 with a projected cost plan well in excess of the approved grant generated, in the main, by the extent of the GP provision the school had planned. 

The school was advised in a letter dated 14 December 2016 to scale back the works to be consistent with the scope of works and grant originally approved.

My Department has no difficulty with the project proceeding within the scope of work and grant approved, provided that this course of action is now compliant with all Statutory approvals.  It would be prudent for the School Authority to contact my Department's Planning and Building Unit to discuss this matter.