Richard Boyd Barrett (Dún Laoghaire, People Before Profit Alliance)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

60. To ask the Minister for Education and Skills if he will reconsider the proposed divestment process and establish an independent working group with representatives of all the patron bodies to formulate a transparent process that puts parents' wishes at the centre; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10456/17]

Richard Bruton (Dublin Bay North, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

As the Deputy will be aware, I recently announced new plans aimed at providing more multi-denominational and non-denominational schools across the country, in line with the choices of families and school communities and the Programme for Government commitment in this area.  This initiative has been designed to put parents and their views at the centre of the process.  This will be achieved by surveying the views of parents at the beginning of the process and through a very substantial level of consultation with local community and school interests where an existing patron is proposing to transfer patronage of an existing school to an alternative patron body.

In devising this roadmap to accelerate the transfer of patronage in order to increase the number of non-denominational and multi-denominational schools, I propose to concentrate on the reconfiguration of existing school provision.  By this I mean facilitating voluntary transfers of existing schools to alternative, non-denominational or multi-denominational patrons in areas which demonstrate a demand.

This will involve the Education and Training Boards in the initial phase, as the State’s local education authorities, identifying areas where there is likely to be demand for greater diversity and they will work with pre-school services to establish evidence of this demand among the cohort of pre-school parents. There will then be discussions between individual ETBs and the existing patrons/landowners concerning the possible transfer of schools to accommodate this demonstrated demand for diversity.

Each ETB will then prepare a report for the Department outlining the levels of demand within their functional areas and the responses of the existing patrons as to how this might be accommodated through the reconfiguration of existing school provision.

In the subsequent implementation phase, where the level of demand for multi-denominational schools is sufficient to justify transfer of a school from denominational to multi-denominational patronage, a process will commence to give effect to that. There will be a role for the existing patron/landowner in consulting with local community and school interests and taking into account proposals from different prospective multi-denominational patrons.  It is envisaged that transfers will largely be by way of voluntary transfer of live schools by existing patrons.

This new process for supporting transfers of schools to multi-denominational patrons in response to the wishes of local families is based around principles of transparency and cooperation. Therefore, there will be a very substantial level of consultation of local communities in the process, both with the ETBs in the initial phase to establish evidence of demand by consulting pre-school parents and subsequently through the requirement for the existing patron to consult with local community and school interests in proposing to transfer patronage of an existing school to an alternative patron body.  In that process, the existing patron will also take into account proposals from all prospective multi-denominational patrons that wish to be considered.

It is important to respect the voluntary nature of these transfers, given that the current patron is in most cases owner of the land on which the school stands.  My Department will develop protocols on patronage transfer with existing patrons to ensure that school and local communities and prospective patrons are fully consulted before a decision is made.  I am confident that this process will respect the views of all parties - parents, local schools and communities and patrons, I anticipate full co-operation from all parties.

Ruth Coppinger (Dublin West, Anti-Austerity Alliance)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

61. To ask the Minister for Education and Skills if he will report on the process for awarding patronage of new secondary schools in the Dublin 15 area; if the diversity in the population was considered; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10412/17]

Richard Bruton (Dublin Bay North, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Since 2011 new schools are established in areas to meet demographic growth. My Department uses a Geographical Information System to identify areas under increased demographic pressure nationwide. The system uses data from a range of sources including information from my own Department's databases.  With this information, demographic exercises are carried out to determine where additional school accommodation is required.

When it is decided that a new school is required, my Department runs a separate patronage process to decide who will operate the school. The criteria used in relation to patronage of the new school place particular emphasis on parental demand for plurality and diversity of patronage, with parental preferences from the area to be served being central to the process. In this regard, patrons and prospective patrons must collect and demonstrate evidence of parental demand from the area to be served for the model of provision proposed as part of their application under the process.

The assessment stage of the process for the new post-primary school to serve Carpenterstown & Castleknock, Dublin 15 included a review of parental preferences for each patron applicant, together with a comprehensive demographic analysis of the area, a review of the extent of diversity of patronage and provision currently available in the area.  Parental preferences are key to decisions regarding patronage of new schools under the patronage assessment process.  The model proposed by Edmund Rice Schools Trust (ERST) will extend existing co-educational provision in the area and although will not extend diversity of provision or patronage in the area, comparing the valid parental preferences, there was a clear majority of parental interest favouring ERST.

Once completed, draft assessment reports were forwarded for the consideration of the New Schools Establishment Group (NSEG), which is an external independent advisory group set up to oversee the process.  Following their consideration, the NSEG submitted a report with recommendations to me for consideration and final decision.  I then announced the successful patron of each school.  The full assessment reports including the criteria used in relation to patronage of the new school and the NSEG recommendations are available on my Department's website.