Aengus Ó Snodaigh (Dublin South Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

837. To ask the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence when the military authorities were first made aware of the health and safety issues at Casement Aerodrome; the way in which these concerns were communicated to the authorities; if they were passed on to him; and the action that was taken in respect of these disclosures. [9628/17]

Aengus Ó Snodaigh (Dublin South Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

838. To ask the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence if his attention has been drawn to other health and safety reports done by or for the Air Corps since the 1990s, which highlighted breaches of health and safety procedures at Casement Aerodrome; and the way in which the recommendations in these reports were actioned. [9629/17]

Aengus Ó Snodaigh (Dublin South Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

840. To ask the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence the eight phases that are being implemented to improve health and safety at Casement Aerodrome. [9631/17]

Paul Kehoe (Wexford, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I propose to take Questions Nos. 837, 838 and 840 together.

The Deputy will recall that these issues were raised during oral parliamentary questions on 15 February 2017. In my reply, I advised the Deputy that I would make enquiries with the military authorities. I have since written to the Chief of Staff in this regard and, I will revert to the Deputy in due course.

Aengus Ó Snodaigh (Dublin South Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

839. To ask the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence the reason, when the HSA inspected Casement Aerodrome on 4 February, 5 April and 28 September 2016, authorities waited until 21 October 2016 before taking action to implement the HSA's recommendation. [9630/17]

Paul Kehoe (Wexford, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

As I outlined to the Deputy in my response to his parliamentary question on 15 February 2017, the military authorities have advised me that there was no delay in relation to the Air Corps' response to the Health and Safety Authority (HSA) Report.

As recognised in the HSA report of October, 2016, the Air Corps had already commenced activities of improvement and were proactive in implementing change before, during and after the engagement with the HSA.

Aengus Ó Snodaigh (Dublin South Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

841. To ask the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence the reason it took from November 2015, when his Department first received a protected disclosure relating to the Air Corps, until July 2016 to appoint an independent reviewer to examine breaches of health and safety at Casement Aerodrome. [9632/17]

Aengus Ó Snodaigh (Dublin South Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

842. To ask the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence when he expects the independent reviewer to complete the report into health and safety at Casement Aerodrome; if he will publish the report and all other internal reports to his Department pertaining to this matter; and if he will ensure full public disclosure on this matter. [9633/17]

Aengus Ó Snodaigh (Dublin South Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

845. To ask the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence his views on the concerns of whistleblowers regarding the impartiality of a person (details supplied) who was appointed as independent assessor to investigate health. [9636/17]

Paul Kehoe (Wexford, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I propose to take Questions Nos. 841, 842 and 845 together.

Three disclosures in respect of health and safety issues in the Air Corps, made under the Protected Disclosures Act 2014, were received in November 2015, December 2015 and January 2016. Certain of the issues raised in the protected disclosures relate to ongoing litigation and in that context, legal advice was sought on how best to progress and deal with the material received. In addition, the nature of the issues raised crossed issues of compliance with legislation, personnel issues and matters relating to technical management. Therefore, it was important to identify an appropriate individual to carry out the review of the allegations contained in the disclosures.

Having regard to the foregoing, a person was appointed to undertake the review at the earliest opportunity. Unfortunately, this individual was not ultimately in a position to carry out the review. I immediately moved to appoint an alternative third party to carry out the independent review and I am satisfied with the progress of the review since then and I look forward to receiving a final report in the near future. The question of the publication or otherwise of the final report will be addressed once I receive same but I can assure the Deputy that any recommendations contained in the final report will be acted upon to ensure the safety of the men and women of the Air Corps.

I am fully satisfied with regard to the impartiality of the independent person appointed to investigate the allegations made in the protected disclosures to which the Deputy refers.