Ruth Coppinger (Dublin West, Anti-Austerity Alliance)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

436. To ask the Minister for Social Protection his views on contacting non-custodial parents to inform them that they are no longer liable to pay maintenance for their children as it has been reported (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27249/16]

Leo Varadkar (Dublin West, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

The Family Law Acts, which are under the remit of the Department of Justice and Equality (D/JE), place a legal obligation on parents to maintain their children. In cases where the family unit has broken down these obligations continue to apply and relevant maintenance payments can be arranged either privately or through D/JE supports like the Family Mediation Service, the Legal Aid Board and the Courts. The arrangement of maintenance is therefore a matter between both parents regardless of whether or not either parent is in receipt of a social welfare payment.

The liability to maintain family provisions, contained in social welfare legislation, are separate to, and do not negate or supersede parents’ obligations under Family Law. Where a lone parent is in receipt of OFP, the liability to maintain family provisions provide the Department of Social Protection with a legislative basis to carry out an assessment against the other parent and issue a Determination Order for them to pay a contribution either to the Department or the lone parent. The Department is not arranging maintenance but is ensuring, where possible, that as OFP is in payment that the other parent makes a financial contribution either to the Department or the lone parent.

Where the OFP payment ceases (e.g. the lone parent transitions from OFP to another social welfare payment as a result of the age of their youngest child or the lone parent finds employment and is no longer entitled to OFP), and the Department had successfully arranged a contribution from the other parent (which only occurs in less than 8% of cases), the Department must inform the other parent that his/her liability to the Department has ceased. The letter does not inform the other parent that s/he is no longer liable to pay maintenance and makes it clear that any existing maintenance arrangements private or otherwise should remain in place. These letters have always issued when the OFP payment ceases.

Currently contribution assessments can only be carried out where the OFP is in payment and this does not extend to other social welfare payments, including the Jobseeker’s Transitional Payment (JST). The Department is currently reviewing the liability to maintain family provisions.

Ruth Coppinger (Dublin West, Anti-Austerity Alliance)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

437. To ask the Minister for Social Protection his views regarding the impact that seeking maintenance from the liable relative which is a condition of the JobSeeker's transitional payment scheme may have on the welfare of parents who would be required to make contact with abusive former partners; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27250/16]

Leo Varadkar (Dublin West, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

The jobseeker’s transitional payment (JST) is available to lone parents, who would be entitled to claim one parent family payment, but that their youngest child is aged 7 to 13 years inclusive. These customers are exempt from the full jobseeker’s allowance conditions that require them to be available for, and genuinely seeking, full-time work.

As with conditionality for one parent family payment, customers will be expected to have sought maintenance from the other parent, where possible. Departmental staff would explain this to customers during the initial claim appointment.

However, it is not the policy of the Department to have JST customers contact former abusive partners to seek maintenance. In such situations, claims would be processed without delay and without the customer having to make contact with their former partner.