Written answers

Friday, 16 September 2016

Department of Public Expenditure and Reform

Lansdowne Road Agreement

Photo of David CullinaneDavid Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

891. To ask the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform if he will explain the contradiction between his statement to Dáil Éireann on 12 July 2016 that non-unionised public service workers who comply with the terms of that collective agreement will attract the benefits of the Lansdowne Road Agreement on one hand and the statement from the Department of Education and Skills on the other, as reported recently (details supplied); if his statement of 12 July 2016 is still valid in the context of the publicly-stated position of the Department of Education and Skills; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24882/16]

Photo of Paschal DonohoePaschal Donohoe (Dublin Central, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I refer to my reply to Parliamentary Question No. 454 of 12 July 2016, and the position remains unchanged. Those unions/associations who hold representation rights for public service grades who subscribe to collective agreements such as the Lansdowne Road Agreement attract the benefits of such agreements as do members of such grades who are not members of those unions/associations. Collective Agreements are concluded between employers and unions representative of the public servants in the grades to whom the agreement relates not individuals.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.