David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

513. To ask the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform the number of pilot projects identified since 2005 to date to prepare flood maps and flood risk management plans for a river basin projects; the delivery date of each project; the estimated cost at inception; the estimated cost if delivered; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22305/16]

Seán Canney (Galway East, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

A review of national flood policy was undertaken in 2003-2004. The review was undertaken by an Inter-Departmental Review Group, led by the Minister of State at the Department of Finance with special responsibility for the Office of Public Works (OPW). The Review Group prepared a report that was put to Government, and subsequently approved and published in September 2004.

The scope of the review included a review of the roles and responsibilities of the different bodies with responsibilities for managing flood risk, and to set a new policy for flood risk management in Ireland into the future.

Three specific recommendations of the Report, led to the development and implementation of the Catchment Flood Risk Assessment and Management (CFRAM) Programme. These were:

- Focus on managing flood risk, rather than relying only on flood protection measures aimed at reducing flooding.

- Taking a catchment-based approach to assess and manage risks within the whole-catchment context.

- Being proactive in assessing and managing flood risks, including the preparation of flood maps and flood risk management plans.

In 2005, a Plan for the implementation of the new policy was developed by the OPW, and this included the proposed approach for developing and implementing what became the National CFRAM Programme. This Programme would be a major undertaking that is new within Ireland, and so it was hence decided that pilot projects should be undertaken to develop and test the process before rolling the Programme out at a larger scale. It was intended that pilot testing might be undertaken over a range of catchments to develop an understanding of the different issues that might arise in catchments of different characters (as influenced by factors such as size, degree of urbanisation and availability of data). The selection of pilot catchments was however primarily governed by data availability, the pro-activeness of Local Authorities and prioritisation based on the existing degree of potential risk and the pressure for future development

The Implementation Plan identified nine candidate communities or catchments as possible pilot CFRAM projects. Four pilots were eventually progressed, which were:

- The Lee CFRAM Pilot Project, which included large urban areas of high risk (i.e., Cork City), as well as a number of smaller towns and villages potentially ay risk, with flooding occurring from both the rivers and the sea. This catchment hence included priority areas of assessment (i.e., Cork City) as well as a diverse range of factors that would enable robust testing of the CFRAM process.

- The Dodder CFRAM Pilot Project, which included significant urban areas within Dublin that had previously experienced severe flooding, and hence was a priority area of assessment.

- The Fingal - East Meath Pilot CFRAM Project where there was significant pressure for development leading to the relevant councils proactively seeking flood risk assessments to inform sustainable development.

- The Suir CFRAM Project, where previous work had been done, and which was deemed suitable to be undertaken in-house to build the technical expertise to enable OPW staff to critically assess and work with the CFRAM outputs, noting the OPW’s responsibility to maintain and review the Plans.

Of the remaining candidates projects, it might be noted that:

- two candidate rivers/catchments were integrated to form part of the scope of the Fingal - East Meath Pilot CFRAM Programme,

- flood risk assessments and/or the development of flood risk management measures were taken forward for two candidate communities through other projects, and,

- major schemes were progressing to address the principal areas of risk in two other candidate catchments.

The first of the Pilot CFRAM Studies (the Lee Pilot CFRAM Study) commenced mid-2006, and the Dodder Pilot CFRAM Study and then Suir Projects then commenced shortly thereafter. The Fingal-East Meath Pilot CFRAM (the FEM-FRAM) Study began in 2008 following a request from Fingal County Council. The projects have been delayed by a number of factors, including aerial survey delays.

The draft Flood Risk Management Plans, which represents substantial completion of the work, were published as follows:

- Lee Catchment: February 2010

- Fingal - East Meath Area: November 2011

- Dodder Catchment: March 2012

The completion of the Suir CFRAM Project is now aligned and co-ordinated with the South Eastern CFRAM Project, given the overlap of membership between the Steering Groups for both projects.

The contracted and out-turn costs for the pilot CFRAM Studies is as set out as follows:

1: Projected cost to end 2016

Costs have increased above those contracted by €2.4m. Of this increase, €1.1m is for additional work agreed in advance, including the development of new methods and approaches for testing in the Pilot Studies, and subsequent application in the National CFRAM Programme, and the work required to re-calibrate and validate the Lower Lee model after the flood of November 2009. Payments of €1.2m have also been made as compensation to the consultants for disruption and additional work related primarily to the delays in the delivery of the survey data.

David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

514. To ask the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform the number of flood risk and flood hazard maps which have been submitted to the OPW; the number which met the due date deadline in 2014; the number which are outstanding; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22306/16]

Seán Canney (Galway East, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

In March 2014, the OPW reported the required flood maps for 50 of the 300 Areas for Further Assessment (AFAs). This included the reporting of the maps for the Lee, Dodder and FEM-FRAM Pilot CFRAM Projects.

The OPW has engaged with the European Commission on an ongoing basis since 2013 in relation to the progress in Ireland with regard to producing and submitting its map requirements in line with the EU timeframe.

The OPW had signalled to the EU Commission that it could report its national predictive flood maps to meet its compliance with the EU Floods Directive but that, given the approach of the work being undertaken by the OPW, it did not consider doing so to be of benefit purely for the sake of reporting compliance.

All of the flood maps were published in November 2015 for public consultation under SIs 122 and 495 of 2010 and 2015 respectively. Since closure of the public consultation on 23 December 2015, the OPW has been updating and finalising the maps on the basis of the observations and objections submitted.

All of the flood risk and hazard maps were reported to the EU Commission in February 2016. Note that the delay from the intended December 2015 date quoted was due to the winter flooding of 2015/16 and the associated demands this placed on OPW resources.

It should be noted that the flood mapping being developed under the CFRAM Programme significantly exceeds the requirements of the EU 'Floods' Directive, as it is deemed that additional maps are required to optimise the benefits of the maps and ensure the robust development of flood risk management measures. The production of these additional maps has placed increased resource demands on the consultants undertaking the CFRAM Projects.

Examples of additional mapping includes:

- Preparation of flood maps for two potential future scenarios reflecting the potential impacts of climate change - This will permit the consideration of potential future adaptation requirements into the flood risk management planning process, and can also inform spatial planning and development management decision-making.

- Preparation of flood maps for eight flood event magnitudes/probabilities, where the Directive requires only two - This provides a significantly better understanding of flood risk, and can inform emergency response given the detailed understanding as to how a flood can develop and evolve.

- Flood Zone maps, which are not a requirement of the Directive - These maps correspond to the Flood Zones defined in the Guidelines on the Planning System and Flood Risk Management (DECLG/OPW, 2009), hence directly supporting sustainable planning and development, and the avoidance of building in floodplains.

In total, the OPW is producing approximately 40,000 flood maps through the National CFRAM Programme, of which only approximately 13,000 are required under the EU 'Floods' Directive.