Written answers

Thursday, 7 July 2016

Photo of Michael McGrathMichael McGrath (Cork South Central, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

89. To ask the Minister for Finance his estimate of the revised net fiscal space that would arise in each of the years 2017 to 2021 in the event of real gross domestic product growth for each of the years 2016 to 2021 being 1%, 2% and 3% less than currently forecast; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [20330/16]

Photo of Michael NoonanMichael Noonan (Limerick City, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Estimates of fiscal space based on the expenditure benchmark are unaffected by changes in actual GDP. Instead, the relevant input is the estimate of the potential growth rate of the economy, as estimated by the European Commission each Spring.

The rationale for this is simple: budgetary policy should not be pro-cyclical.  In other words, fiscal space should not increase when there is a cyclical improvement in the economy and, similarly, fiscal space should not reduce when there is a cyclical downturn. 

Fiscal space would be affected in the event that the potential (or trend) growth rate of the economy was to slow, i.e. there is a permanent slowdown in the pace at which the economy can grow without generating inflationary pressures.

A reduction in the trend growth rate of 1 per cent each year over the next five years relative to the baseline forecast set out in the Stability Programme would reduce the expenditure benchmark reference rate (i.e. the average potential growth rate calculated over a ten-year period) by an average of 0.6 pp per annum.

On this basis, if the potential growth rate for each of the years 2016 to 2021 is 1, 2 and 3 per cent less than currently forecast, the impact on fiscal space is outlined in the following table.

Net fiscal space remaining €bns2017*2018201920202021
Baseline SPU1.01.23.03.13.0
1% annual decrease in potential growth rate1.00.82.62.62.5
2% annual decrease in potential growth rate1.00.52.12.22.0
3% annual decrease in potential growth rate1.00.21.71.71.6
* No change to 2017 potential growth rate as it is frozen on the basis of Commission Spring 2016 estimates 

These estimates should be treated with caution and are subject to revision, given that a number of simplifying assumptions must be made in order to provide these estimates.  For instance, the assumption is made that the MTO is still achieved in 2018.  Furthermore, these estimates are based on total expenditure remaining unchanged. It is, of course, difficult to envisage that a 2-3 per cent lasting shock to the potential growth rate would not have further impacts on other inputs into the Expenditure Benchmark calculation.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.