Written answers

Tuesday, 23 June 2015

Photo of Clare DalyClare Daly (Dublin North, United Left)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

115. To ask the Minister for Finance if he will make provision for the recovery of the 2.53% stamp duty pension levy to members of the Irish Airlines (General Employees) Superannuation Scheme, through the taxation system, particularly if it is proposed by the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform, as per the Lansdowne Road agreement, to reduce, from 2016, the pension levy deductions for public sector employees that were applied under the Financial Emergency Measures in the Public Interest Acts, and in view of the fact that most of the pensionable service years of retired pensioners in the scheme were earned while employed in the public sector, but that none of the public sector threshold pension levy exemptions have been applied to them. [24524/15]

Photo of Michael NoonanMichael Noonan (Limerick City, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

This question refers to two separate and distinct measures. The first measure referred to is the stamp duty levies applying to the assets of funded pension arrangements introduced in 2011 to pay for the Jobs Initiative, the chargeable persons for which are the trustees of pension schemes and others responsible for the management of pension fund assets. The second measure is the pension-related deduction (PRD) which has applied to the remuneration of public servants since 2009.

The original 0.6% stamp duty levy on pension fund assets ended last year. The additional levy of 0.15% which I introduced for 2014 and 2015, mainly to help continue to fund Jobs Initiative, will also end after this year.

The position is that the equivalent value of all of the money raised from the stamp duty levy has been used to fund the wide range of measures introduced in the Jobs Initiative to protect existing jobs and to help create new jobs and the Initiative has been a success in this regard.  The measures introduced include expenditure measures such as the JobBridge and Springboard schemes, as well as a number of tax and PRSI incentives such as the reduction in the VAT rate from 13.5% to 9% for the tourism and hospitality sectors and the halving of the lower employer PRSI rate. 

While the pension fund levies have ceased and will be ceased as I have already outlined, I have no plans to repay the pension fund levy collected as may be implied in the question. The value of the funds raised by way of the levy have been used to protect and create jobs and this has helped to create the improving financial and economic position of the State. Taxpayers to whom the impact of the levy may have been passed on by the chargeable persons responsible for the payment of the levy (the pension scheme trustees etc) will benefit from the changes which I began in Budget 2015 and which will continue in future Budgets to reduce the income tax burden on low and middle income earners.

With regard to the PRD, I am informed by my colleague the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform that the application of the PRD to public servants resulted in an average reduction of some 7% in the remuneration of public servants (from March 2009) and was followed by a further reduction of 6% from 1 January 2010 in the remuneration rates applicable to public servants. A third pay reduction applied to public servants earning in excess of €65,000 with effect from 1 July 2013 at rates ranging from 5.5% to 10%.  I am further informed that these various reductions did not apply to employees of the organisations which form the membership of the pension scheme referred to in the question as they are not public service bodies for the purpose of the Financial Emergency Measures legislation under which these measures were introduced.

Finally, while changes to the PRD are proposed from next year under the Lansdowne Road Agreement which will result in reductions in the PRD, particularly affecting public servants on low and middle incomes, there is no provision for the repayment of PRD already deducted from the remuneration of affected public servants.  

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.