Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

27. To ask the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform if, in the interests of open government, he is prepared to legislate to require every public body that is fully funded by the Exchequer, and other bodies that receive substantial public funding, to disclose pay and pension arrangements for staff; and if he will make public the details of the public service pension arrangements on retirement for senior managers. [29616/14]

Brendan Howlin (Wexford, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

The current legal position is that under the existing Freedom of Information (FOI) legislation, an exemption is provided for personal information, which would include pension arrangements, except where such information concerns a director or a member of staff of a public body, which is covered by FOI.  The Freedom of Information Act specifically provides that where a public body is covered by FOI, the terms under which a member of staff, holds or has held office, is not personal information and as such is subject to release under FOI.   

As the Deputy is aware, I have already provided in the new Bill that FOI will be extended to all public bodies.  In addition, I propose to make an amendment at Report stage in the Dail to broaden the definition of what does not constitute personal information to ensure that the terms and conditions of any individual who holds or held any office, or any position in an FOI body remunerated from public funds, will be made available under FOI, rather than just those of a director or member of staff as at present (other than where for the specific reasons I set out at Committee Stage for the Bill a specific exclusion applies against the release of such information in the case of the NTMA and its associated bodies). 

In light of the foregoing I do not believe that the course of action referred to in the Deputy's question is necessary.