Written answers

Tuesday, 25 March 2014

Department of Justice and Equality

Legal Aid Applications

Photo of Pearse DohertyPearse Doherty (Donegal South West, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

738. To ask the Minister for Justice and Equality the waiting times by area for access to the Legal Aid Board. [12848/14]

Photo of Alan ShatterAlan Shatter (Dublin South, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I wish to inform the Deputy that demand for legal services from the Legal Aid Board has increased significantly since the downturn in the economy and this has led to an increase in waiting times. The waiting times as of 1 March 2014 are set out in the table below. Demand in 2013 was at the same level as it was in 2012 and while there was a 10% drop in demand at the general law centres in 2012 compared to 2011, nevertheless the demand for general legal services (excluding asylum) in 2011 was 93% greater than it was in 2006. The Board has not been subject to the sort of cuts to its grant-in-aid that other public service bodies have had to experience and I have been able to maintain the Board’s grant-in-aid at the same level for 2014 as it was in the previous three years.

Nevertheless it is a challenging environment that has resulted in lengthened waiting times for those seeking legal services for matters that are not prioritised. I know that waiting times are a matter of constant concern to the Board and that it keeps them under very active review. I am also aware that the Board is constantly keeping the delivery of its services under review with a view to getting legal services to those most in need of them as quickly as possible. Notwithstanding the pressures on resources, the Government has further supported the Board by approving exemptions from the moratorium to enable the organisation to recruit front-line staff for direct service delivery. The Public Appointments Service concluded a solicitor recruitment competition for the Board last year from which a number of permanent appointments have been made and a number of temporary positions have also been filled. In September 2013 I signed into law by way of Regulations, a package of proposals from the Board for the revision of the financial eligibility and contributions provisions governing the granting of civil legal aid. The Regulations include a reduction in the capital eligibility threshold for legal services and they also include increases in the contributions payable by most persons seeking legal services. These provisions should have some impact, albeit relatively marginal, on the resources available to the Board.

In response to the changed environment, the Board has taken steps to try and improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the delivery of its legal services. I will outline the nature of some of those steps. The Board has been piloting a triage approach to service delivery and this approach is operative in most of its centres at this stage. The pilot is in response to lengthening waiting times. The aim of the triage approach is that every applicant gets to see a solicitor within a period of one month for the purpose of getting legal advice. Consultations are broadly limited to 45 minutes. If the applicant requires further services they remain on the waiting list. There is or has been a backlog of applicants to be seen for triage purposes, which is why it is taking time to reduce the waiting time for such an appointment to one month. Where the triage approach is operative, there is a waiting time for the triage appointment and a waiting time for the second consultation. A first review of the operation of the pilot indicated that clients were satisfied with this particular service initiative. This was because they got early access to a solicitor for advice on their legal disputes that provided clarity about the options open to them and the process through which their disputes might be resolved.

In August 2012, the Board introduced a new case management system in its law centres. This is a start-to-end system which will in the medium term deliver efficiencies in terms of the administration aspect as well as in relation to the delivery of the legal services. It will take time for the full benefits of this system to materialise. In November 2011, I transferred responsibility for the management and administration of the State funded family mediation service to the Board. A key reason for this transfer was to improve the synergies between the State-funded family mediation services and the State-funded civil legal aid services. Most of the demand for legal services is in the area of family law. Improving the synergies will be for the benefit of the customer and will help move away from a litigation-first approach that may on occasion be too common. Already there are very positive signs from a pilot initiative operating in Dolphin House, which is where the Dublin District Family Court sits, involving the co-location of the courts and a mediation service with a legal service located there too. Similar initiatives have been introduced in Cork and Naas and are being evaluated. I know the Board is working particularly hard on promoting mediation as a meaningful option.

While the Board's asylum-related legal services were previously funded from a separate grant, since 2012 I have funded the Board on the basis of a single grant-in-aid. With the drop in demand for asylum, the Board has taken steps to integrate the delivery of its asylum related services into the general law centre service delivery model, thereby effectively transferring resources from the asylum area to the general legal service area where the demands have increased. I am aware that the Board has maintained a high level of usage of private solicitors for family law cases in the District Court. Cases in the District Court are often those that need the most immediate remedy. I am also aware that the Board continues to engage with other key players in the justice and legal area such as the Courts Service and the HSE )now the Child and Family Agency), with a view to trying to ensure State-funded resources that impact on its area of business are used to best effect. I am very conscious of the difficulties that delays in accessing legal aid can give rise to. I am aware that the Board is also keenly aware of those difficulties and is working to ensure the delays are minimised to the greatest extent possible.

Waiting times as at 1 March 2014

Law CentrePart-Time CentreWaiting time for a first consultationFurther waiting time for a second consultation (centres operating triage)
-Athlone24 weeks9 weeks
AthloneMullingar24 weeks10 weeks
Blanchardstown - 25 weeksn/a
Castlebar - 17 weeks42 weeks
Cavan - 20 weeks22 weeks
Clondalkin - 5 weeks31 weeks
Cork North - 40 weeks15 weeks
Cork South - 64 weeks54 weeks
Dundalk - 16 weeksn/a
Ennis - 23 weeks20 weeks
Finglas - 30 weeks6 weeks
Galway Francis St - 12 weeks53 weeks
Galway Seville House - 29 weeks16 weeks
Gardiner Street - 17 weeks42 weeks
Kilkenny Carlow3 weeks45 weeks
- Kilkenny3 weeks44 weeks
Letterkenny - 18 weeks40 weeks
Limerick - 44 weeksn/a
Longford - 17 weeks29 weeks
MonaghanDrogheda29 weeksn/a
-Monaghan22 weeksn/a
Montague Court - 22 weeksn/a
Navan - 17 weeks24 weeks
Nenagh - 4 weeks35 weeks
Newbridge - 8 weeks43 weeks
Personal Injuries Unitn/an/a
Portlaoise - 48 weeks59 weeks
-Boyle5 weeks24 weeks
SligoSligo7 weeks27 weeks
Smithfield - 44 weeks35 weeks
Tallaght - 17 weeks23 weeks
Tralee- 22 weeksn/a
Tullamore- 17 weeksn/a
Waterford-24 weeksn/a
Wexford-47 weeks7 weeks
Wicklow- 13 weeksn/a

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.