Written answers

Wednesday, 18 December 2013

Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources

Energy Regulation

Photo of Brendan GriffinBrendan Griffin (Kerry South, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

144. To ask the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources the impact he envisages the sale of Bord Gáis will have on the Shannon LNG project; if he will review the Government policy of imposing tariffs of energy suppliers who do not use the British-Irish gas interconnectors. [54623/13]

Photo of Brendan GriffinBrendan Griffin (Kerry South, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

145. To ask the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources if he will confirm that it is within his powers to provide general policy direction to the CER; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [54624/13]

Photo of Brendan GriffinBrendan Griffin (Kerry South, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

146. To ask the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources the rationale for imposing tariffs of energy suppliers who do not use the British-Irish gas interconnectors; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [54625/13]

Photo of Pat RabbittePat Rabbitte (Dublin South West, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I propose to take Questions Nos. 144 to 146, inclusive, together.

The process to sell the Bord Gáis Energy business initiated earlier this year attracted significant interest from a broad range of potential international bidders, reflecting the positive international sentiment towards Ireland. The sale is a very positive development in that it will mark the entry of international strategic investors into the all island energy market. I do not envisage that the sale will have any impact on the Shannon LNG business.

Decisions on the regulatory treatment of the gas interconnectors and tariffing are matters for the Commission for Energy Regulation (CER) under the Gas (Interim ) (Regulation) Act 2002. Accordingly, policy in relation to tariff setting has been settled since 2002 when the Oireachtas conferred responsibility for tariff setting, under the 2002 Act, on the CER. The CER as the independent energy regulator has a remit to protect energy consumers, ensure security of supply and support competitiveness. The CER also has a duty to ensure that new sources of gas for the Irish market do not result in unwarranted increases in the price of gas to business and domestic consumers.

The rationale for the CER’s decision of 29 June 2012 as regards pricing and treatment of the interconnectors is that if the current regime were to persist, and with new sources of gas such as Corrib gas and Shannon LNG, the price of gas would rise significantly for all Irish consumers, regardless of the source of the supply. Given our high dependence on gas for electricity generation this would also give rise to electricity price increases and would negatively impact on Ireland’s competitiveness. Full details of the CER’s rationale for its decision are to be found in the CER Decision Paper of 29 June 2012 (CER/12/087) available from the CER website at

The independence of the CER in its decision making is expressly provided for in EU legislation as transposed into Irish law. As regards the issue of a policy direction by me as Minister, Section 10A of the Electricity Regulation Act 1999, as amended, does provide that I may give “general policy directions ” from time to time. However, I am expressly precluded from giving any policy direction in respect of any individual undertakings or persons. Taking account of binding EU legislation as transposed into Irish law in regard to the independence of regulators and the assignment of gas regulatory functions to the CER, including tariffing, I am of the view that Section 10A of the 1999 Act does not provide an adequate legal basis for a direction sought by and for the benefit of an individual entity.

Photo of Tom FlemingTom Fleming (Kerry South, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

147. To ask the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources if he will intervene to revive the proposed €600 million liquid gas terminal at Tarbert; if he will introduce a legislative mechanism to address the impediments and ensure that the LNC terminal is developed as it would increase security and diversity of energy supply and give direct access to competitive gas supplies which is crucial for our economic recovery. [54652/13]

Photo of Pat RabbittePat Rabbitte (Dublin South West, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Since 2002, the regulation of the gas market has been the responsibility of the Commission for Energy Regulation (CER), which is independent in the performance of its functions. I have no direct statutory function in relation to liquefied natural gas (LNG) projects, including specific projects like the Shannon LNG project. The LNG facility would provide additional security of supply to Ireland in that it would bring diversity to Ireland's supply sources and would bring connectivity for the first time to the global LNG market. The prospect of such a facility is therefore a potentially positive step for the island of Ireland. Decisions on the regulatory treatment of the gas interconnectors and tariffing are statutorily matters for the Commission for Energy Regulation (CER) under the Gas (Interim) (Regulation) Act 2002. Therefore, policy in relation to tariff setting has been settled since 2002 when the Oireachtas conferred responsibility for tariff setting on the CER. The CER as the independent energy regulator has a remit to protect energy consumers, ensure security of supply and support competitiveness. The CER also has a duty to ensure that new sources of gas for the Irish market do not result in unwarranted increases in the price of gas to business and domestic consumers.

On the 29 June 2012 the CER published a decision in regard to the regulatory treatment of the BGE interconnectors. That decision subsequently became the subject of a Judicial Review by Shannon LNG. On the 11 December, 2013, the High Court upheld the CER decision of 29 June 2012 on reform of the tariffing regime. The matter of an appeal of that decision is an issue for consideration by Shannon LNG.

I understand that the CER intends to carry out a consultation on tariff settlement in Quarter 1 of 2014 with decisions in Quarter 2. Tariff reform is being driven by the entry of Corrib gas into the system, with first flows anticipated in 2015. Therefore, it is in the interests of all stakeholders, including consumers, that clarity in regard to tariffing arrangements is obtained as soon as possible and I would urge all concerned to engage with the CER on its forthcoming consultation on this regulatory issue.

The independence of the CER in its decision making is expressly provided for in EU legislation as transposed into Irish law. Requests have been made to me as Minister to issue a policy direction to the CER in accordance with powers of direction provided under section 10A of the Electricity Regulation Act 1999. Section 10A of the 1999 Act, as amended, does provide that I may give “general policy directions” from time to time. However, I am expressly precluded from giving any policy direction in respect of any individual undertakings or persons. Taking account of binding EU legislation as transposed into Irish law in regard to the independence of regulators and the assignment of gas regulatory functions to the CER, including tariffing, I am of the view that Section 10A of the 1999 Act does not provide an adequate legal basis for a direction sought by and for the benefit of an individual entity.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.