Kevin Humphreys (Dublin South East, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

197. To ask the Minister for Justice and Equality the number of requests for the tapping or interception of conversations on mobile or landline telephones have been approved in the last year; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [32635/13]

Kevin Humphreys (Dublin South East, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

198. To ask the Minister for Justice and Equality the regulations or judicial protections that apply to requests for the tapping or interception of conversations on mobile or landline telephones here; if he will outline the procedure that applies for such requests; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [32636/13]

Kevin Humphreys (Dublin South East, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

199. To ask the Minister for Justice and Equality the number of requests that have been submitted for the interception of communications through a mobile or landline telephone belonging to a journalist or politician that have been submitted in the last year; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [32637/13]

Alan Shatter (Dublin South, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I propose to take Questions Nos. 197 to 199, inclusive, together.

The Deputy will appreciate that it is not the practice and would be contrary to public interest to disclose details of requests or authorisations for interceptions including their number. However, I can assure the Deputy that there is a comprehensive legislative regime in place to deal with lawful interception.

Under Section 2 of the Interception of Postal Packets and Telecommunications Messages (Regulation) Act 1993 Ministerial authorisation may be given for interceptions in the interests of the security of the State or for the purpose of criminal investigation. Such authorisations are only issued following application from the Garda Commissioner or the Chief of Staff of the Defence Forces, in accordance with the Act.

The Act provides for the appointment of a High Court Judge to keep under review the operation of the Act and to ascertain whether its provisions are being complied with. The judge must report to An Taoiseach on the operation of the Act. Such reports are subsequently laid before the Houses of the Oireachtas. In addition, the Act provides for a procedure whereby a member of the public who believes that his/her communications have been intercepted may apply to a "Complaints Referee" for an investigation into the matter. The role of the Complaints Referee is to investigate whether an authorisation was in force and, if so, whether the provisions of the Act have been contravened in relation to that authorisation. If the Complaints Referee finds that there has been a contravention he should notify the individual concerned and report it to An Taoiseach. He may also recommend the payment of compensation. The current Complaints Referee is a judge of the Circuit Court.

Pádraig Mac Lochlainn (Donegal North East, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

200. To ask the Minister for Justice and Equality if he will confirm that an assertion in an affidavit, the High Court Record No. 2006/1177P, on behalf of the Commissioner of An Garda Síochána, the then Minister for Justice and the Attorney General, that on 19 July 2000 a gun and ammunition, central to the case, were destroyed, is correct. [32655/13]

Alan Shatter (Dublin South, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I am informed by the Garda authorities that the firearm and ammunition in question were destroyed on the 19th July 2000.