Written answers

Wednesday, 17 April 2013

Department of Public Expenditure and Reform

Commercial Rates Valuation Process

Photo of Colm KeaveneyColm Keaveney (Galway East, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

To ask the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform if his attention has been drawn to the fact that the current arrangement by which full time community childcare facilities are in the main exempt from rates while private providers are not, which places private providers at an unfair disadvantage and endangers the employment that they provide; if he will consider, as a means by which childcare costs may be reduced for working families, the provision of an exemption from rates for all childcare providers; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17925/13]

Photo of Brendan HowlinBrendan Howlin (Wexford, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

The Valuation Act, 2001, which came into effect on 2 May, 2002, provides that all buildings used or developed for any purpose including constructions affixed thereto are rateable unless expressly exempt under Schedule 4 of the Act. Charitable organisations providing childcare facilities which are used exclusively for charitable purposes and otherwise than for private profits are excluded from liability for commercial rates. However, the Act maintains the long-standing position that commercial facilities, including play schools, pre-schools, crèches and Montessori schools, which are operated on a commercial for-profit basis are liable for rates.

I have no plans to provide for special treatment of private childcare facilities under the Valuation Act which provides that all buildings used for commercial enterprises are valued in a fair and equitable manner. Exceptions to this key principle would be quickly followed by demands for similar treatment from other interests which in equity would be difficult to resist. The process could thus substantially reduce local authority revenues, which would have to be made good by imposing a corresponding increase on the remaining rate payers.

I should point out that the Commissioner of Valuation is independent in the exercise of his duties under the Valuation Act, 2001.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.