Written answers

Wednesday, 25 May 2011

Department of Agriculture, Marine and Food

International Agreements

8:00 pm

Photo of Gerry AdamsGerry Adams (Louth, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 46: To ask the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will vote against the protocol related to the controversial EU-Morocco Fisheries Partnership Agreement that will be tabled for the considerations of the Council on 27 April 2011 in Brussels. [8774/11]

Photo of Simon CoveneySimon Coveney (Cork South Central, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The current Fisheries Partnership Agreement (FPA) between the European Community and Morocco came into force in February 2007. A Fisheries Protocol, setting out the detailed operating rules for the FPA, was also established at that time. The FPA, which includes the waters off Western Sahara, renews automatically every four years. The Protocol, however, expired on 27 February 2011.

The FPA with Morocco is considered one of the EU's most important bilateral fisheries agreements. Under the protocol, the EU provides a financial contribution to the Moroccan authorities each year in exchange for fishing opportunities for EU fishermen in Moroccan waters. As with all FPAs this contribution is intended both as payment for the fishing opportunities and to assist in the development of the capacity of local fisheries sector to exploit its own resources sustainably.

Eleven Member States, including Ireland, are allocated fishing opportunities under the agreement. Ireland receives a quota of 2,500 tonnes each year in the FPA's industrial pelagic category; however no Irish fishing vessels have operated in Morocco under this FPA since 2007.

Negotiations on the renewal of the Protocol, which were due to commence late in 2010 were delayed as Morocco was considered not to have provided sufficient data regarding the regional socio-economic impacts of the EU's annual financial contribution. Given the important fishing interests that the EU has in Morocco, and because Morocco belatedly provided some information, the European Commission asked the Council to be provided with a mandate to negotiate a one-year Protocol on very similar lines to the expiring one. The Commission's goal was to allow EU fishing operations in Moroccan waters to continue uninterrupted while detailed consideration was given to the merits of negotiating a new longer and potentially different Protocol.

Given the urgency of the situation and the importance of this agreement for European fishermen, Ireland supported the Commission's request to the Council to be provided with a mandate to negotiate a one-year Protocol.

Ireland's support for the Commission's mandate was given on the proviso that before the Council would ratify the new short term protocol, the Commission would share with Member States the information provided by the Moroccan authorities concerning the implementation of the current Protocol and its regional impact. This would allow Member States to make a full assessment of whether the current agreement was providing a benefit to the Saharawi people.

In late February, the EU Commission and Morocco initialled an agreement for a one year Fisheries Protocol. As part of this negotiation, transitional arrangements have been put in place for up to six months, which will allow EU fishing operations in Morocco to continue uninterrupted pending completion of the ratification procedures. The initialled Protocol must still be ratified by the EU and this only takes place when agreed by Council and consented to by the European Parliament. To date the Commission has not yet made a proposal for ratification but it is expected shortly. The new protocol has additional requirements for the provision by Morocco of details of the geographic distribution of benefits.

Ireland has been clear that our final decision would be influenced by whether it can be persuasively shown that there is appropriate benefit deriving to the Saharawi people through implementation of the FPA. Therefore, our position on the ratification of the one year protocol remains reserved, as the Commission's analysis of the information provided by the Moroccan side on the regional benefits has not been unequivocal. While citing that positive benefits were in evidence in the regional distribution of funds including to the Western Sahara, the level of those benefits remain uncertain.

Ireland has always been a firm supporter of the right to self-determination of the people of the Western Sahara, and the Government remains firmly committed to this principle.

Ireland is also of the view that the FPA with Morocco should be implemented if it can be shown to be to the benefit of all the people concerned (including the Saharawi, in relation to the waters off Western Sahara) and in full accordance with the principles of international law.

I am not convinced that this is the case at present and will consider very carefully Ireland's final position on ratification of the one year protocol when a formal proposal comes from the Commission.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.