Written answers

Thursday, 19 May 2011

Department of Education and Skills

School Enrolments

11:00 am

Photo of Clare DalyClare Daly (Dublin North, Socialist Party)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 49: To ask the Minister for Education and Skills if he will eliminate the inconsistencies in school enrolment forms throughout the country by recommending such forms require the signature of both legal guardians who act jointly in accordance with section 6(1) of the Guardianship of Infants Act 1964. [12261/11]

Photo of Clare DalyClare Daly (Dublin North, Socialist Party)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 50: To ask the Minister for Education and Skills the steps he will take to ensure the children of separated parents have their right respected to have both parents act jointly on their behalf in cases when parental consent is required, in accordance with Articles 2.1 and 2.2 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, and section 6(1) of the Guardianship of Infants Act. [12268/11]

Photo of Ruairi QuinnRuairi Quinn (Dublin South East, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I propose to take Questions Nos. 49 and 50 together.

The selection and enrolment of pupils in schools is the responsibility of the authorities of the individual school. Under section 15 (2) (d) of the Education Act 1998, each school is legally obliged to disclose its enrolment policy and to ensure that as regards that policy that principles of equality and the right of parents to send their children to a school of the parents choice are respected. Article 42 of the Constitution provides for the right of parents to choose the form of education they provide or to have provided to their children. Primary legislation gives effect to this right and includes the Education Act 1998 and the Education (Welfare) Act 2000.

None of the foregoing legislation specifically distinguishes between parents who act in concert and those who disagree and are separated, divorced or unmarried. However each provides that "parent" shall be interpreted to include-

"a foster parent, a guardian appointed under the Guardianship of Children Acts, 1964 to 1997, or other person acting in loco parentis who has a child in his or her care subject to any statutory power or order of a court and, in the case of a child who has been adopted under the Adoption Acts, 1952 to 1998, or, where the child has been adopted outside the State, means the adopter or adopters or the surviving adopter".

Enrolment of children is, in the first instance, a matter for Boards of Management rather than my Department and Boards must address the circumstances of each case while respecting any order made by the Court in relation to the custody and welfare of the child. In general, it is my Department's view that both parents should be encouraged to take an active interest in their children's education and it is to the benefit of the children and the school when they do. It is appreciated that practical difficulties for schools can arise where parents are separated. However, my Department's approach to the issue of the rights of separated parents to involvement in their children's education is that the rights of both parents should be respected and given meaningful, practical expression in matters such as school reports, attendance at parent/teacher meetings and other school functions and that generally both parents should receive the same information and level of co-operation from the school. A qualification to that approach would arise where the best interest of the child required a different approach.

Schools are best placed to exercise their own judgements as to what is appropriate in each individual case given their particular knowledge of the individual circumstances and having regard to any order made by the Court in relation to the custody and welfare of the child.

Comments

Cathal Garvey
Posted on 12 Jun 2011 12:18 pm (Report this comment)

Minister Quinn unnecessarily confused matters by answering these two separate questions together.
Question 49 was in relation to parental rights for guardians acting jointly, regardless of whether they were living together or not whereas question 50 was specifically in relation to the rights of children whose parents are separated.
Regardless, the Ministers answer is in contrast to his answer when asked if he is considering issuing guidelines to schools regarding admissions policies in general (http://debates.oireachtas.ie/dail/2011/05/12/00057.asp). The minister then replied that "I believe that it is time to take a fresh look at how primary legislation and regulation in this area could be developed in order to meet the needs of parents, pupils and schools in a more efficient and effective manner and moving on possible legislative and regulatory change is a clear priority for me this year".
It is interesting that the Minister added that "A qualification to that approach would arise where the best interest of the child required a different approach". It is important to note that according to the UNHCR, "there is no formalised procedure for determining or assessing the best interests of the children". http://www.unhcr.ie/180609.html.
This means that the "best interests of the child" is determined by each individual Board of Management without any guidance whatsoever.

Log in or join to post a public comment.