Written answers

Thursday, 25 November 2010

Department of Social and Family Affairs

Departmental Expenditure

5:00 pm

Photo of Bernard DurkanBernard Durkan (Kildare North, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 185: To ask the Minister for Social Protection the extent of any over or under expenditure, capital or current, by vote, heading or sub heading to date in 2010 in tabular form; the reason for any surplus or shortfall; if expenditure to date in each case is in line with budgetary projections; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [44662/10]

Photo of Éamon Ó CuívÉamon Ó Cuív (Galway West, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Expenditure on the Department's schemes, services and administration to end of October was €17,041 million or 1.3% below profile. The overall position is set out in the table below.

Scheme expenditure out of Vote 38 and the SIF is incurred almost entirely on payments to individual recipients based on pre-determined qualifying conditions and rates of payment, most of which are set out in legislation. The expenditure, which is demand-led, is driven by economic, social and demographic factors.

Expenditure BreakdownAmount€'000Profile€'000Variance€'000%
VOTE 38
Administration295,635309,581-13,946-4.5%
Schemes and services9,119,3519,235,998-116,716-1.3%
Subvention to Social Insurance Fund1,621,4481,155,906465,54240.3%
VOTE 38 GROSS EXPENDITURE11,036,43410,701,485334,8803.1%
Less
X Appropriations-in-Aid180,661176,3854,2762.4%
VOTE 38 NET EXPENDITURE10,855,77310,525,100330,6043.1%
Less
Subvention to Social Insurance Fund1,621,4481,155,906465,54240.3%
Adjusted Vote 38 NET EXPENDITURE9,234,3259,369,194-134,938-1.4%
SOCIAL INSURANCE FUND
SIF schemes7,582,5097,660,505-77,996-1.0%
SIF admin224,337227,735-3,398-1.5%
TOTAL SIF EXPENDITURE7,806,8467,888,240-81,395-1.0%
Total DSP Expenditure on Schemes, Services & Admin17,041,17017,257,435-216,333-1.3%

As at end October 2010, expenditure on Vote 38 schemes and administration was €216 million (or 1.3%) under profile. The main reason for this underspend was a slightly lower overall number of recipients than estimated, particularly on the Live Register.

The Subvention to the Social Insurance Fund is ahead of profile because receipts from PRSI contributions are lower than expected.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.