Written answers

Wednesday, 7 July 2010

Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform

Visa Applications

12:00 pm

Photo of Pat RabbittePat Rabbitte (Dublin South West, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 230: To ask the Minister for Justice and Law Reform in view of the administrative rules governing the visas issued to domestic workers employed in embassies/consular/diplomatic households, the name of this specific type of visa; the terms and conditions of this visa and the criteria for issuing them; if there is a difference between the type of visa issued to household workers recruited in the country that the diplomat represents and the visas issued to household workers recruited here; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30627/10]

Photo of Dermot AhernDermot Ahern (Louth, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

In my reply to Question No. 154 on 24 June 2010 I explained how the visa system operates in respect of diplomatic and other staff of foreign missions including domestic workers or private servants. Normally, persons in this category, where they are visa-required nationals, would be granted a D-type visa which indicates that the holder could remain for longer than 90 days.

As I explained in that earlier reply, the Immigration Act 2004 does not apply to a person who is entitled to privileges and immunities under the Diplomatic Relations and Immunities Act 1967. The 1967 Act gave the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961 the force of law in the State. The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961 makes provision to the effect that private servants of members of the mission shall, if they are not nationals of or permanently resident in the receiving State, be exempt from dues and taxes on the emoluments they receive by reason of their employment. In other respects, they may enjoy privileges and immunities only to the extent admitted by the receiving State. Private servants who are nationals of or permanently resident in the receiving State shall enjoy privileges and immunities only to the extent admitted by the receiving State. The Convention requires that in both situations, the receiving State must exercise its jurisdiction over those persons in such a manner as not to interfere unduly with the performance of the functions of the mission.

From an immigration point of view, a private servant/household worker who was already resident in the State on foot of a separate immigration permission may seek to resume their previous immigration status when their assignment with the embassy/diplomat comes to an end. Where the person was recruited from outside the State it would be expected that they would leave the State when their assignment comes to an end.

It is difficult to say precisely what would be the position in a particular case without knowing the circumstances. Therefore, if the Deputy has a particular case in mind he could contact the Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service, Immigration Policy Division, which can review the circumstances of the case and thereby give a more accurate report on the position.

Photo of Dan NevilleDan Neville (Limerick West, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 231: To ask the Minister for Justice and Law Reform if he will make a statement on a matter (details supplied). [30638/10]

Photo of Dermot AhernDermot Ahern (Louth, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I am informed by the Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service (INIS) that a letter issued to the person referred to by the Deputy on 9th June 2010.

I am further informed by INIS that on receipt of a response from the person referred to by the Deputy the case will be considered further.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.