Willie Penrose (Longford-Westmeath, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 176: To ask the Minister for Finance the factors that would be considered in the review of decentralisation in 2011 whereby decentralisation which was planned for a number of places, including Mullingar, County Westmeath, has now been deferred; if one of these factors would include that of legitimate expectation on the part of the civil servants who applied for decentralisation in good faith and who are now disappointed; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11708/10]

Willie Penrose (Longford-Westmeath, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 177: To ask the Minister for Finance if, in the context of the decentralisation proposals which are being deferred and which are subject to review in 2011, he will indicate that such a review will result in the indefinite deferral of decentralisation to places such as Mullingar, County Westmeath; the implications for those civil servants who applied for decentralisation in good faith; the alternatives that can be put in place for persons who had hoped to relocate, on the basis of being assured in writing that same would take place; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11709/10]

Brian Lenihan Jnr (Dublin West, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I propose to take Questions Nos. 176 and 177 together.

In light of the budgetary constraints at this time and affordability issues, I have decided to defer proceeding with permanent accommodation in respect of a number of locations, including Mullingar, at this time. I can confirm that all deferred locations will be considered as part of the overall review of the programme in 2011. The nature of that review and the factors to be considered have not been developed. I intend to bring proposals to the Government in that regard in due course.