Written answers

Thursday, 28 May 2009

Department of Social and Family Affairs

Social Welfare Benefits

3:00 pm

Photo of Bernard DurkanBernard Durkan (Kildare North, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 158: To ask the Minister for Social and Family Affairs when rent support will be offered to a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22011/09]

Photo of Mary HanafinMary Hanafin (Dún Laoghaire, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The position remains as advised in Parliamentary Question No. 317 which I answered for the Deputy on 19th May 2009. The Executive has advised that payment of rent supplement and arrears due from 1 January 2009 was made to the person concerned on 30 March 2009. Payment has also been made in respect of the months of April and May.

Photo of Denis NaughtenDenis Naughten (Roscommon-South Leitrim, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 159: To ask the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the reason the first €95.23 in maintenance is taken into account for calculating rent allowance; if this discourages one parent families from declaring the fathers name and maintenance payment; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21920/09]

Photo of Mary HanafinMary Hanafin (Dún Laoghaire, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The means test for the supplementary welfare allowance scheme, through which rent supplement is provided, requires that all types of household income, including maintenance payments for a lone parent and his/her children, must be taken into account in determining a person's entitlement under the scheme.

Rent supplement is normally calculated to ensure that a person, after the payment of rent, has an income equal to the rate of supplementary welfare allowance appropriate to their family circumstances less a weekly minimum contribution of €18, which recipients are required to pay from their own resources. Many recipients pay more than €18 because recipients are also required, subject to income disregards, to contribute any additional assessable means that they have over and above the appropriate basic supplementary welfare allowance rate towards their accommodation costs.

A person who claims a one-parent family payment is required to seek maintenance from her/his spouse or the other parent of the child. These maintenance payments are assessed as means for the purpose of determining entitlement to a one-parent family payment. However, vouched housing costs of up to €95.23 per week (rent or mortgage) are disregarded in establishing the rate of one-parent family payment due. Given that up to €95.23 per week of maintenance payments is disregarded in the means test for the one-parent family payment to allow for housing costs, maintenance of this amount is assessable in determining the appropriate level of rent supplement payable, as the amount of rent supplementation is based on the net amount that a person has available to meet their accommodation costs from their own resources.

Where a person has weekly maintenance payments of more than €95.23, the first €75 a week together with 25% of any additional maintenance above €75 can be disregarded for means assessment purposes. This is to ensure that the family benefits from the extra maintenance income up to that level before it affects their entitlement to rent supplement.

Overall, the means assessment rules are designed to give an incentive to lone parents to seek maintenance payments to improve their household income position, while ensuring that families in that situation have access to the appropriate levels of rent supplementation to meet their accommodation needs. The department is not aware of any evidence to suggest that these measures discourage one parent families from declaring the name of the other parent or details of maintenance payments.

Comments

Mark McGovern
Posted on 3 Jun 2009 11:25 am (Report this comment)

Department of Social and Family Affairs:

I wonder if the Minister could answer the concerns around the local offices not taking calls anymore.

I myself did have to collect benefits a number of years ago and the process was straight forward with payments coming directly into you bank account and now the fact that one must be made to go to the Post office to make a weekly in person collection seems ludicrous when the old system worked fine. This leads into the question on how it is acceptable that the offices like most gov't bodies will not or answer and hang up. I found a very interesting blog that was just posted that details this activity and the reaction that the head office had to his formal complaint.

Link below

http://twtpro.blogspot.com/2009/05/dont-phone-us-well-contac...

In case the link does not work I will quote him below:

*******
"I do like not having to travel every time I want to make a public enquiry, which is not possible if you're one of the thousands with a claim lodged at the Clondalkin branch. For two consecutive days I consistently attempted to make phone contact, sometimes getting a dial tone, sometimes not. The following day I drove to the office and queued at reception, which took a lot less time than when I submitted my claim.

'I've tried to ring over the last two days.'

'The phones have been ringing all day,' the employee said.

It's been two and a half weeks since that piece of inverted logic. Today, I tried to ringing with the same result so I contacted a head office and explained the case.

'Yeah, the offices are under fierce pressure alright.'

'So, that's acceptable. Not answering the phones because they're ringing all day is OK?'

'Yeah.'
*********

This seems to be the standard at all the local offices... and the real point is when one travel to the office they tend not to be busy at all...

Why is it that with such high taxes and costs in this Country that out gov't departments all operate on a 3rd world standard? And why is it acceptable in their eyes?

mandy kelly
Posted on 8 Jun 2009 9:21 pm (Report this comment)

I would really appriciate if any body could tell me if the back to school footwear and clothing allowence is gone now as well as the early childcare supplement.
I was speaking to a lady at my daughters swimming lesson class on saturday and she was very distraught about how she was not going to manage to pay for new books for her two children as well as the compulsery uniforms and school tracksuit and school coat.
As far as i could gather her partner had his hours reduced and they were badly struggling.It is the first ive heard that the back to school allowence was in any way effected.
appriciate any info
regards m

Alan Healy
Posted on 17 Jun 2009 11:29 am (Report this comment)

I do not believe it is gone.
See this press release from the Department of Social Welfare released on Monday.

Parents urged to apply now for Back to School Clothing & Footwear Allowance
http://www.welfare.ie/EN/Press/PressReleases/2009/Pages/pr15...

It has links to the application forms.

Log in or join to post a public comment.