Bernard Durkan (Kildare North, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 204: To ask the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the current or expected residency in the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 22; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [33245/08]

Dermot Ahern (Louth, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The person concerned applied for asylum on 1 December 2004. Her application was refused following consideration of her case by the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner and, on appeal, the Refugee Appeals Tribunal. Subsequently, in accordance with Section 3 of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended), the person concerned was informed, by letter dated 31 January 2006, that the Minister proposed to make a Deportation Order in respect of her.

She was given the options, to be exercised within 15 working days, of leaving the State voluntarily, of consenting to the making of a Deportation Order or of making representations to the Minister setting out the reasons why she should be allowed to remain temporarily in the State. Representations have been submitted on behalf of the person concerned and will be fully considered, before the file is passed to me for decision.

Bernard Durkan (Kildare North, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 205: To ask the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the current or expected residency in the case of persons (details supplied) in County Cork; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [33246/08]

Dermot Ahern (Louth, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The person concerned arrived in the State on 18 September 2003 with her child and applied for asylum. Her application was refused following consideration of her case by the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner and, on appeal, the Refugee Appeals Tribunal. Subsequently, in accordance with Section 3 of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended), the person concerned was informed, by letter dated 24 June 2005, that the Minister proposed to make Deportation Orders in respect of her and her child.

She was given the options, to be exercised within 15 working days, of leaving the State voluntarily, of consenting to the making of Deportation Orders or of making representations to the Minister setting out the reasons why she and her child should be allowed to remain temporarily in the State. Representations were received from the person concerned. Following consideration of the case of the person concerned, and her child, under Section 3 (6) of the Immigration Act, 1999 (as amended) and Section 5 of the Refugee Act, 1996 (as amended) on the prohibition of refoulement, Deportation Orders were signed by the Minister on 25 January 2006 in respect of the person concerned and her child. These Orders were formally served by registered post dated 7 February 2006.

The person concerned subsequently sought to be re-admitted to the asylum process in accordance with the provisions of Section 17 (7) of the Refugee Act, 1996 (as amended). Following consideration of this application, the application was refused and this refusal decision was conveyed in writing to the person concerned by letter dated 12 March 2007.

The person concerned subsequently sought to be enabled to submit an application for Subsidiary Protection in the State in accordance with the European Communities (Eligibility for Protection) Regulations, 2006 (S.I. No. 518 of 2006). Following consideration of this request, a decision was taken to permit the person concerned to lodge such an application, a position conveyed to the person concerned by letter dated 18 October 2007. The person concerned has submitted an application for Subsidiary Protection in the State, on behalf of herself and her child, and this application is under consideration at present. When consideration of this application has been completed, the person concerned will be notified in writing of the outcome.

The person concerned, and her child, remain the subject of Deportation Orders. However, the Deputy can be assured that no steps will be taken to enforce these Orders pending the determination of the application for Subsidiary Protection in the State. In the meantime, however, the person concerned must comply with any reporting requirements placed on her by the Garda National Immigration Bureau (GNIB).

Bernard Durkan (Kildare North, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 206: To ask the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the current or expected residency in the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 7; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [33247/08]

Dermot Ahern (Louth, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The person concerned applied for asylum on 18 October 2001. This application was refused by the Refugee Applications Commissioner, and, following appeal to the Refugee Appeals Tribunal, the original decision to refuse asylum was upheld. The case of the person concerned is being examined in accordance with Section 3 of the Immigration Act 1999 and the person concerned will be informed of any decisions made in due course.