Written answers

Thursday, 24 April 2008

Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform

Asylum Applications

5:00 pm

Photo of Pat RabbittePat Rabbitte (Dublin South West, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 250: To ask the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will provide asylum statistics (details supplied) in respect of each of the previous 12 months. [15907/08]

Photo of Brian Lenihan JnrBrian Lenihan Jnr (Dublin West, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The asylum statistics requested by the Deputy in respect of each of the previous 12 months (April 2007 — March 2008), where available, is set out in tabular format as follows.

Table 1: Place of application for asylum
ORAC*AirportsPrisonsPortsOtherTotal
Apr-07231271117277
May-07265242225318
Jun-07259301827316
Jul-07297302515358
Aug-07239262522294
Sep-07265361700318
Oct-07303312002356
Nov-07291203200343
Dec-07288341620340
Jan-08298121522329
Feb-08255192101296
Mar-08257152205299
Total3,24830424412363,844
*Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner Asylum applications deemed withdrawn.

The Immigration Act, which was commenced on the 15th September 2003, contained a number of key changes to the Refugee Act, 1996 which included the imposition on applicants of a clear statutory duty to actively pursue their asylum applications and co-operate at all times with the processing agencies or face having their applications deemed withdrawn.

The most common reasons for an application to be deemed withdrawn are where the applicant fails to attend for an interview or oral appeal hearing without reasonable cause; fails to co-operate with the Refugee Applications Commissioner or furnish information relevant to his or her application or appeal; or an applicant fails to notify the Commissioner or Refugee Appeals Tribunal of his or her postal address or change of address.

Table 2: Asylum applications deemed withdrawn at First Instance and Appeal Stage
No. of applications deemed withdrawn at first instanceNo. of applications deemed withdrawn at appeal stageTotal no. of applications deemed withdrawn
Apr-0732032
May-07861197
Jun-0738947
Jul-0733740
Aug-07591069
Sep-0759261
Oct-0759160
Nov-07582280
Dec-0749554
Jan-08751388
Feb-0844650
Mar-08541973
Total646105751
Table 3: Recommendations to grant and refuse refugee status at First Instance
Number of recommendations to grant refugee status at first instanceNumber of recommendations to refuse refugee status at first instance
Apr-0736225
May-0727310
Jun-0720223
Jul-0727310
Aug-0734293
Sep-0735253
Oct-0745306
Nov-0729333
Dec-0722253
Jan-0842324
Feb-0838314
Mar-0833262
Total3883,406
Table 4: Asylum appeals received by the Refugee Appeals Tribunal
Number of asylum appeals received
Apr-07168
May-07216
Jun-07206
Jul-07232
Aug-07246
Sep-07199
Oct-07192
Nov-07245
Dec-07141
Jan-08290
Feb-08237
Mar-08199
Total2,571
Table 5: Recommendations to grant and refuse refugee status at appeal stage
Number of recommendations to grant refugee status at appeal stageNumber of recommendations to refuse refugee status at appeal stage
Apr-0714120
May-0720164
Jun-0719138
Jul-0719149
Aug-0714147
Sep-0721134
Oct-0732142
Nov-0719130
Dec-071359
Jan-0822162
Feb-0811133
Mar-082190
Total2251,568
Table 6: Asylum appeals determined on papers and by oral hearings
No. of appeals determined on papersNo. of appeals determined by oral hearings
Apr-0730104
May-0717167
Jun-0729128
Jul-0737131
Aug-0728133
Sep-0722133
Oct-0721153
Nov-0716133
Dec-071062
Jan-0833151
Feb-0826118
Mar-082586
Total2941,499
Table 7: ORAC — Judicial Reviews in respect of asylum decisions
Applications for leave to apply for Judicial ReviewCases where leave was grantedSubstantive cases decided in favour of applicantCases SettledBills of costs received and authorised
Apr-072755
May-07461182
Jun-0732255
Jul-07463184
Aug-07214
Sep-0753
Oct-0741142
Nov-0729275
Dec-0721363
Jan-0848135
Feb-084562
Mar-082154
Total4301316741

Where ORAC is satisfied that there has been an error or omission in its procedures which might have a bearing on the outcome of an investigation, in the interests of fairness and efficiency, ORAC's policy is to reach a mutually agreeable settlement in relation to judicial review cases without delay. However, where ORAC considers that its procedures have been fully and correctly adhered to, it is prepared to contest judicial review proceedings in order to fulfil its statutory responsibility to protect the integrity of the asylum process.

Where a case is decided by the Courts in favour of the applicant, the Courts usually award costs against the State. There can be a significant gap between the award of costs by the Courts in particular cases and the payment of those costs due to delays in the submitting of bills of costs by the applicant's legal representative. Where the case is settled by the State, the terms of the settlement includes a commitment to reconsider the applicant's application of refugee status.

Table 8: RAT — Judicial Reviews in respect of asylum decisions
Applications for leave to apply for Judicial ReviewCases where leave was grantedSubstantive cases decided in favour of applicantCases SettledBills of costs received
Apr-0725011614
May-072551199
Jun-0730511613
Jul-0740703418
Aug-072500023
Sep-07330000
Oct-074030118
Nov-0743431419
Dec-0710111613
Jan-0840111811
Feb-0839952110
Mar-082500105
Total3753513175143
Table 9: Deportation orders issued and effected in respect of failed asylum applicants
Deportation orders issued to failed asylum applicantsDeportation orders effected in respect of failed asylum applicants
Apr-0727
May-0758
Jun-071313
Jul-0729
Aug-076510
Sep-0719
Oct-07603
Nov-07645
Dec-07018
Jan-0809
Feb-08114
Mar-08593
Total28298
Table 10: Voluntary returns of failed asylum applicants
Number of voluntary returns
Apr-0711
May-079
Jun-078
Jul-0719
Aug-079
Sep-077
Oct-078
Nov-079
Dec-0712
Jan-0810
Feb-089
Mar-0815
Total126

Parents of Irish Born Children

In so far as the parents of Irish born children are concerned, the information requested by the Deputy in relation to asylum applications, leave to remain and deportations is not available as statistics are not maintained in such a way that differentiates applications made by parents of Irish born children. The Irish Born Child 2005 Scheme ended in March 2005 and there is no longer any basis for making Permission to Remain applications on the basis of parentage of citizen children.

Leave to Remain in the State

Unsuccessful asylum applicants are afforded the opportunity to apply to the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform for temporary leave to remain in the State, in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended). Every such application is considered under the eleven headings set out in Section 3(6) of the Immigration Act 1999.

Asylum applicants and the right to work

Section 9(4)(b) of the Refugee Act 1996 (as amended) provides that an applicant for asylum shall not seek or enter employment. Asylum seekers only have temporary permission to remain in the State pending the determination of their applications.

Table 11: Asylum applications on hand at First Instance and at Appeal Stage
ORACRATTotal
Less than 6 Months1,0811,2332,314
6 – 12 Months107798905
12 – 18 Months10510520
18 – 24 Months5471476
More than 24 Months15357372
Total cases pending1,2183,3694,587

Statistics are not maintained in a way which provides a precise figure on the number of judicial review cases on hand in the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner at the end of March 2008. At the end of 2007, there was a total of 433 judicial reviews on hand in the ORAC. As at 31 March 2008 there was a total of 555 judicial reviews on hand in the Refugee Appeals Tribunal.

Costs recovered by the State in relation to Judicial Reviews

Any costs awarded by the Courts to the State in relation to asylum/immigration judicial reviews are in respect of legal fees incurred and are allocated to the Chief State Solicitors Office. The Deputy may wish to contact that office regarding the information being sought in this area.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.