Written answers

Wednesday, 21 November 2007

Department of Finance

Pension Provisions

9:00 pm

Photo of Róisín ShortallRóisín Shortall (Dublin North West, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 155: To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Finance his estimate of the cost of meeting future pensions and other commitments from the Social Insurance Fund up to 2055 under the assumptions used in the recent review of the Social Insurance Fund and assuming income from the National Pension Reserve Fund; and the estimated average percentage increase in income tax if all of these costs were to be paid by tax payers. [30330/07]

Photo of Brian CowenBrian Cowen (Laois-Offaly, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The Social Welfare Consolidation Act 2005 requires the Minister for Social and Family Affairs to arrange for an actuarial review of the financial condition of the Social Insurance Fund to be conducted every five years. The most recent actuarial review, which covers the period from 2005 to 2061, was published on 17 October 2007. One of the Review's principal findings was that, based on a central scenario with stated assumptions about demographic, economic and benefit developments over the period (the last assuming that future benefits would increase in line with future earnings), PRSI rates would have to increase over their present levels if income and expenditure on the Fund are to be balanced over the long term to 2061. However, the Review estimated that if no change were made to PRSI contribution rates over that period, Social Insurance Fund expenditure would exceed Social Insurance Fund income by €35.3 billion in real terms in 2061, assuming benefits were increased in line with projected earnings growth. Alternatively, the Review indicated that if future benefits were increased at the rate of projected price inflation over the same period, the Fund would remain in surplus for much of the period and expenditure would exceed the Fund's income by the much smaller amount of €1.5 billion in 2061.

In a situation where future benefits are increased at the level of earnings growth and assuming no other change, the Exchequer, as residual financer of the Social Insurance Fund, would have to cover that shortfall. While the proceeds of the National Pensions Reserve Fund, which was established for the purpose of meeting as much as possible of the cost to the Exchequer of Social Welfare pensions and Public Service pensions from 2025 until at least 2055, will be available to meet some of these Social Insurance Fund subvention costs over some or all of this period, the Actuarial Review did not make any assumption about the scale of funds that could be made available to the Social Insurance Fund from the National Pensions Reserve Fund for that purpose, nor did it make an estimate of the scale of increases in the levels of income taxation, or indeed any other taxation head, that would be necessary to meet a shortfall in the Social Insurance Fund over the longer term, assuming no change to the existing PRSI regime or otherwise. It should also be noted that the projected shortfall on the Social Insurance Fund (based on stated assumptions) that would have to be covered by the Exchequer out to 2061 is only one of the many long-term social welfare and other demands that would have to be financed by the Exchequer and that income taxation is only one of the range of income sources that would be available to the Exchequer to meet these demands.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.