Written answers

Thursday, 6 July 2006

Department of Finance

Departmental Agencies

6:00 pm

Photo of Catherine MurphyCatherine Murphy (Kildare North, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 235: To ask the Minister for Finance the non-Governmental agencies or organisations his Department has provided funding to in 2004, 2005, and 2006; the amount of funding provided to each in each year; the number of applications for funding submitted to his Department in total; the number of these applications which were refused; the reason for same; the percentage of his Department's overall annual budget such funding equates to; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27381/06]

Photo of Brian CowenBrian Cowen (Laois-Offaly, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

My Department's Vote provides for Grants-in-Aid to two non-Governmental bodies, the Institute of Public Administration and the Economic and Social Research Institute. These bodies have been provided with the following funding in the period in question.

Year Agency/Organisation Amount
2004 Economic and Social Research Institute 2,944,000
2005 Economic and Social Research Institute 3,026,000
2006 (year to date) Economic and Social Research Institute 1,315,000
2004 Institute of Public Administration 3,237,000
2005 Institute of Public Administration 3,318,000
2006 (year to date) Institute of Public Administration 1,415,000

In addition, two non-Governmental bodies applied to the National Public Procurement Policy Unit of my Department for funding. The Irish Congress of Trade Unions received €15,383 in 2005 for the publication of a document on Public Private Partnerships (PPP) and to support a seminar on PPPs for its members. Another non-Governmental body made an application but this was rejected as the proposal would have resulted in a duplication of training services relating to Public Private Partnerships.

My Department also operates a scheme to make available, from the proceeds of the National Lottery, funds to supplement the income of promoters of private charitable lotteries competing directly with National Lottery products. In the period in question, my Department received 35 applications for funding. Three of those were refused, on the grounds that the applicants were not operating a lottery under the provisions of the Gaming and Lotteries Acts on or before 1 January 1997, which is one of the criteria for eligibility. The following table sets out the funding provided to each of the successful applicants in the years 2004 and 2005. No funding has been provided yet this year.

Year Agency/Organisation Amount
2004 REHAB Lotteries 5,951,569
Gael Linn 442,993
Irish Cancer Society 389,043
Polio Fellowship 389,043
West of Ireland Alzheimer Foundation 92,878
Drogheda Community Services Centre 80,640
The Hanly Centre 75,626
Longford Cathedral Circle 50,744
Associated Charities Trust 49,411
Asthma Society of Ireland 34,174
Irish Wheelchair Association 31,997
Mulranny Day Centre Housing Co. Ltd. 15,599
Cappoquin Community Development Co. Ltd.13,281
The Liffey Trust1,430
2005 REHAB Lotteries 5,314,136
Gael Linn 407,162
Irish Cancer Society 358,684
Polio Fellowship 358,684
Irish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children 350,632
Irish Lung Foundation Limited 219,886
Irish M.E. Trust 176,137
Asthma Society of Ireland 141,773
The Hanly Centre 101,180
Drogheda Community Services Centre 82,042
West of Ireland Alzheimer Foundation 80,210
Longford Cathedral Circle 50,270
Associated Charities Trust 38,427
Irish Wheelchair Association 22,063
Mulranny Day Centre Housing Co. Ltd. 15,649
Cappoquin Community Development Co. Ltd. 12,236
Cope Foundation 152
The Liffey Trust 145

The amount of funding for relevant bodies mentioned above (i.e. in the text and the table) represented 11% of my Department's Vote for 2004. The amount for 2005 represented 14% of my Department's Vote. The amount of expenditure for the year to date in 2006 represents 2% of my Department's Vote for this year.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.