Gerard Murphy (Cork North West, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 163: To ask the Minister for Finance, further to the reply to Question No. 147 of 2 March 2006, if he will explain the reason a person (details supplied) was not contacted as per High Court instruction so that their concerns could be taken into account before any decision was made by the Chief State Solicitor re-entering the case. [14116/06]

Tom Parlon (Laois-Offaly, Progressive Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I refer to my response to Question No. 315 of 21 February 2006 which confirmed that the State had just received sworn evidence from a party claiming entitlement to the lands in question. This meant that the State has had to reconsider its options on how best to proceed. The State may or may not now re-enter the section 30 application in court. If the State decides to re-enter the application, the person in question will be notified of the application in accordance with the High Court order made on the initial application to court dated 5 February 2004.