Bernard Durkan (Kildare North, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 698: To ask the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the residency status in the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 6; if his attention has been drawn to their health situation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10890/06]

Michael McDowell (Dublin South East, Progressive Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I refer the Deputy to the answers I gave to Parliamentary Questions Nos. 384 on 6 December 2005, 183 on 1 December 2005 and 46 on 20 October 2005. The person concerned applied for permission to remain in the State under the revised arrangements announced by me on 15 January 2005 for the processing of applications from the non-national parents of Irish-born children born before 1 January 2005. For the reasons set out in my previous replies the applicant does not meet the criteria for the granting of permission to remain in the State under the revised arrangements, and her application was refused on that basis. All matters relating to the refusal of this application will be taken into account by me in the context of the consideration of the file under the terms of section 3 of the Immigration Act 1999, as amended.

Bernard Durkan (Kildare North, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 699: To ask the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the residency status in the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 6; if his attention has been drawn to their health situation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10891/06]

Michael McDowell (Dublin South East, Progressive Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I refer the Deputy to the answer I gave to Parliamentary Question No. 384 on 6 December 2005. The person concerned applied for permission to remain in the State under the revised arrangements announced by me on 15 January 2005 for the processing of applications from the non-national parents of Irish-born children born before 1 January 2005. For the reasons set out in my previous reply the applicant does not meet the criteria for the granting of permission to remain in the State under the revised arrangements, and his application was refused on that basis. All matters relating to the refusal of this application will be taken into account by me in the context of the consideration of the file under the terms of section 3 of the Immigration Act 1999, as amended.