John Ellis (Sligo-Leitrim, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 200: To ask the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform when a dealing number will be registered in the name of a person (details supplied) in County Leitrim. [8651/06]

John Ellis (Sligo-Leitrim, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 201: To ask the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will clarify the position with regard to Question No. 530 of 14 February 2006. [8652/06]

John Ellis (Sligo-Leitrim, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 202: To ask the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the position regarding Questions Nos. 531, 532, 533 and 534 of 14 February 2006 in the names of persons (details supplied) on the basis that promised action has not been taken. [8653/06]

John Ellis (Sligo-Leitrim, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 203: To ask the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the position regarding Question No. 535 of 14 February 2006 in the name of a person (details supplied) as the Land Registry office has not contacted this Deputy as promised. [8654/06]

John Ellis (Sligo-Leitrim, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 204: To ask the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the position regarding Question No. 536 of 14 February 2006 in the name of a person (details supplied) as the promised action has not been taken. [8655/06]

John Ellis (Sligo-Leitrim, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 205: To ask the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the position regarding Question No. 537 of 14 February 2006 in the name of a person (details supplied) as no correspondence has been received from the Land Registry office. [8656/06]

Michael McDowell (Dublin South East, Progressive Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I propose to take Questions Nos. 200 to 205, inclusive, together.

I am informed that the Land Registry has written directly to the Deputy in respect of each of the cases referred to. It is also my understanding that the Deputy's original queries were in fact dealt with by the Land Registry but that the transmission of responses was unsuccessful due to an e-mail error. Any inconvenience experienced is regretted.