Written answers

Thursday, 2 February 2006

Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform

Registration of Title

3:00 pm

Photo of Michael RingMichael Ring (Mayo, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 156: To ask the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the reason incorrect information was given by the Land Registry Office in response to a parliamentary question. [3634/06]

Photo of Michael McDowellMichael McDowell (Dublin South East, Progressive Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I am informed by the Registrar of Titles that the information provided in response to Parliamentary Question No. 479 of 31 January 2006 was in fact correct.

I am further informed that subsequent to supplying the Deputy with this information, the Land Registry continued its work on the applications concerned and that both Dealing Number D2004SM006350T and Dealing Number D2005SM011496G are now completed.

Photo of Finian McGrathFinian McGrath (Dublin North Central, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 157: To ask the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the position regarding a person (details supplied); and if this serious allegation of corruption will be investigated. [3647/06]

Photo of Finian McGrathFinian McGrath (Dublin North Central, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 160: To ask the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the position regarding the disputed signature on deed of transfer (details supplied) on 8 August 1996 at the Land Registry Office, Dublin; if this reported fraud in 1998 was investigated properly; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [3663/06]

Photo of Michael McDowellMichael McDowell (Dublin South East, Progressive Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I propose to take Questions Nos. 157 and 160 together.

I am informed by the Garda authorities that an investigation file in this matter was referred to the Director of Public Prosecutions who instructed that no criminal proceedings be taken in the matter.

As I am sure the Deputy will appreciate, the Director of Public Prosecutions is independent in the performance of his functions and it is not open for me to comment or intervene in his decisions in any way.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.