Written answers

Tuesday, 29 November 2005

Department of Education and Science

Teaching Qualifications

9:00 pm

Photo of Enda KennyEnda Kenny (Mayo, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 431: To ask the Minister for Education and Science the essential qualifications required for all persons wishing to teach mathematics at second level education; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36395/05]

Photo of Mary HanafinMary Hanafin (Dún Laoghaire, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

A second level teacher must hold, in addition to the required teacher training, a suitable primary degree or equivalent award, from a nationally recognised university or similar third level college, which is adequate to enable the holder to teach to the highest level at least one subject from the second level schools curriculum. The duration of such a degree programme must be at least three years of full-time study or equivalent. A suitable degree for the purposes of teaching mathematics to the highest level, that is, to leaving certificate higher level, is one where a person has studied mathematics as a major subject in the degree extending over at least three years. The criteria by which qualifications are assessed for the purpose of teaching individual subjects, including mathematics, are set out in the document on the general requirements and subject specific criteria for teachers of recognised subjects and additional requirements for specialist teaching posts in mainstream post-primary education, which is available on my Department's website at the following address: http://www.education.ie/servlet/blobservlet/rcst_qualification_requirements.doc?language=EN.

Qualifications already approved, and the subject or subjects for which they are recognised, are set out in the Registration Council booklet Appointment to an incremental position in a Secondary School — Necessity for approval of qualifications by the Registration Council. This booklet is available on my Department's website at the following address: http://www.education.ie/servlet/ blobservlet/rcst_auto_cov.doc?language=EN.

Photo of Joan BurtonJoan Burton (Dublin West, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 432: To ask the Minister for Education and Science the number of students who have sat an scrúdú le haghaidh cáilíochta sa Ghaeilge each year from 1998 to date in 2005; the number of students who have passed; the number of students who have failed; the number of times students have had to repeat some or part of the exam; the cost to the Department of these exams; and the number of students in any of these groups that qualified as teachers outside the State. [36402/05]

Photo of Mary HanafinMary Hanafin (Dún Laoghaire, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Teachers trained outside the jurisdiction of the State, whose qualifications have been assessed and accepted by my Department, but who do not possess an appropriate Irish language qualification, are granted a five year period of provisional recognition to teach in mainstream classes in national schools. During this period these teachers are expected to obtain their Irish language qualification, scrúdú le haghaidh cáilíochta sa Ghaeilge, SCG, in order to become fully recognised. They must also provide certification that they have resided in the Gaeltacht while attending an approved three-week course or its aggregated equivalent.

The following tables detail the number of candidates who sat for, passed and failed the SCG examination from 1998 to date in 2005. Information on the number of times candidates repeat some or part of the examination is not readily available in my Department. Such a breakdown would require an inordinate amount of official time to prepare. Up to 2004, my Department was responsible for administering the SCG examination. The cost each year has been in the order of €100,000. In 2005, Coláiste Mhuire Marino was responsible for the SCG examination. My Department is making a contribution of the order of €306,000 to Coláiste Mhuire towards the costs involved. It should be noted that this contribution includes provision for the once-off costs associated with the development of courses, the training of tutors and the provision of materials etc. in addition to the cost of running the examination. My Department also funds the Education Centre Network, 21 full-time centres and nine part-time centres to deliver local courses based on locally identified needs and Irish language courses form a part of this local course provision.

SCG May 1998.
Modules Candidates Pass Fail
All 141 56 85
SCG April 1999.
Modules Candidates Pass Fail
All 93 23 70
Modular Examinations Introduced.
SCG October 1999.
Modules Candidates Pass Fail
Paper 1 38 13 25
Paper 2 347 27
Aural 35 13 22
Oral 34 15 19
SCG May 2000.
Modules Candidates Pass Fail
Paper 1 134 61 73
Paper 2 124 48 76
Aural 131 62 69
Oral 123 65 58
SCG October 2000.
Modules Candidates Pass Fail
Paper 1 53 29 24
Paper 2 47 24 23
Aural 62 28 34
Oral 52 33 19
SCG April 2001
Modules Candidates Pass Fail
Paper 1 154 92 62
Paper 2 126 78 48
Aural 152 113 39
Oral 133 80 53
SCG October 2001.
Modules Candidates Pass Fail
Paper 1 83 33 50
Paper 2 52 18 34
Aural 62 36 26
Oral 82 51 31
SCG April 2002.
Modules Candidates Pass Fail
Paper 1 171 111 60
Paper 2 12863 65
Aural 156 143 13
Oral 13483 51
SCG October 2002.
Modules Candidates Pass Fail
Paper 1 109 67 42
Paper 289 36 53
Aural78 38 40
Oral 118 54 64
SCG April 2003.
Modules Candidates Pass Fail
Paper 1 197 45 152
Paper 2 171 46 125
Aural 190 56 134
Oral 164 8183
SCG October 2003.
Modules Candidates Pass Fail
Paper 1 168 52 116
Paper 2 142 5488
Aural 174 52 122
Oral 152 52 100
SCG April 2004.
Modules Candidates Pass Fail
Paper 1 254 142 112
Paper 2 237 14988
Aural 259 131 128
Oral 226 113 113
SCG October 2004.
Modules Candidates Pass Fail
Paper 1 19467 127
Paper 2 19279 113
Aural 204 104 100
Oral 205 13372
SCG March 2005.
Modules Candidates Pass Fail
Paper 1 308 241 67
Paper 2 295 258 37
Aural 320 259 61
Oral 279 242 37

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.