David Stanton (Cork East, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 140: To ask the Minister for Agriculture and Food, further to the reform of the EU sugar regime and Question No. 169 of 4 October 2005, the outcome of the Council of Ministers on 24 and 25 October 2005; her progress in ensuring a more balanced agreement which takes Irish interests into account; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [34205/05]

Mary Coughlan (Donegal South West, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I maintained my firm opposition to the Commission's proposals when I addressed last month's meeting of the Council of Ministers in Luxembourg. I emphasised that the price cuts proposed are too severe, the reforms should be based on a longer lead-in time for the EBA and we should await the outcome of the WTO meeting in Hong Kong before seeking to agree a more equitable and balanced outcome.

I have also continued to remain in contact with like minded colleague Ministers from other member states who are opposed to the reform proposals. In this context, a joint ministerial letter from a group of 11 member states, including Ireland, was submitted to the Commission in advance of the formal discussion at last month's Council meeting, setting out the objections of the group to the proposals. I had previously met the Agriculture Commissioner on a number of occasions to voice my strong reservations. Meanwhile, there has been ongoing contact at official level with other member states and the Commission about the reform proposals.

Negotiations have become more intensive over recent weeks and the UK Presidency is striving to reach political agreement at next week's Council of Ministers. However, I remain resolute in pursuing my overall objective of achieving a more balanced agreement, which will take Irish interests into account.