Written answers

Tuesday, 18 October 2005

Department of Health and Children

National Treatment Purchase Fund

9:00 pm

Photo of Simon CoveneySimon Coveney (Cork South Central, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 120: To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children her views on the recent report from the Comptroller and Auditor General regarding the national treatment purchase fund; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [28904/05]

Photo of John PerryJohn Perry (Sligo-Leitrim, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 137: To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the way in which a hospital with a long waiting list for operations can have the spare capacity to do private work following from the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General; if these hospitals, if funded properly, will do the same work; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [28937/05]

Photo of Emmet StaggEmmet Stagg (Kildare North, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 143: To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if her attention has been drawn to reports that the national treatment purchase fund spent €600 on taxi fares to send a patient from Dublin to Limerick for a minor operation; her views on whether this is the most appropriate use of taxpayers' money; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [28783/05]

Photo of Paul GogartyPaul Gogarty (Dublin Mid West, Green Party)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 151: To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if her attention has been drawn to the criticism made by the Comptroller and Auditor General of the national treatment purchase fund; the amount the treatment purchase fund has cost in 2005; if she can justify spending a reported €600 on a taxi for a patient; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [28961/05]

Photo of Michael NoonanMichael Noonan (Limerick East, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 201: To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the way in which 45% of hip replacements were carried out in the same hospital under the national treatment purchase fund, which was established to carry out procedures that could not be carried out in the public sector to be carried out in the private sector, where the patients name was on a waiting list; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [28935/05]

Photo of Róisín ShortallRóisín Shortall (Dublin North West, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 206: To ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if her attention has been drawn to the recent report of the Comptroller and Auditor General which found that 36% of patients were actually referred by the National Treatment Purchase Fund for private treatment in the very same hospital for which they were waiting for public treatment in the first place; if her further attention has further been drawn to the difficulties reported by the Comptroller and Auditor General in getting information from the National Treatment Purchase Fund; if the Comptroller and Auditor General will be asked to undertake a full value for money audit of the scheme; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [28782/05]

Photo of Mary HarneyMary Harney (Dublin Mid West, Progressive Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I propose to take Questions Nos. 120, 137, 143, 151, 201 and 206 together.

The national treatment purchase fund, NTPF, was established as one of the key actions for dealing with public hospital waiting lists arising from the 2001 health strategy. The strategy envisaged that the NTPF might make use of any capacity within public hospitals to arrange treatment for public patients. It was recognised that during the start-up phase of the fund, the use of public capacity could account for 30% of total NTPF activity, once public core service planned activity was not compromised. The Department has recently advised NTPF that use by the fund of public facilities should be limited to 10% of its total referrals for treatment. The allocation available to the fund in 2005 is €64 million.

The majority of elective orthopaedic surgery, including hip replacements, takes place in public elective orthopaedic facilities which do not provide accident and emergency services. As elective activity in these hospitals does not take place 24 hours per day and seven days a week, using theatres and beds outside of normal working hours is one way of creating extra elective capacity in the public system. Allowing public hospitals to undertake work under the NTPF initiative also incentivises hospitals to perform extra work and to treat more patients over and above core funded activity. This activity is carried out often by staff working overtime, who come in at weekends or who extend theatre time on occasions.

Other situations that compelled the use of public or "in-house" capacity were cases where, for reasons of clinical or patient complexity, it was clearly best practice to have certain patients treated by their own consultant in the hospital where they were on the waiting list. Not to have used this facility would have effectively barred this cohort of patients from accessing the NTPF scheme.

With regard to the transport of patients, the policy of the NTPF is to provide transport for patients where it is deemed medically necessary or where there are people with special needs, for example, the elderly or the infirm. The number of patients that require transport is small. In the case of a patient going abroad for treatment the travel costs are paid for by the NTPF. The authorisation of transport is considered on an individual basis, particularly in circumstances where lack of transport would present a barrier to a patient being treated. Otherwise patients are responsible for their own transport to hospital for treatment.

In the context of his examination of my Department's appropriations account for 2004, the Comptroller and Auditor General carried out a review of the operation of the NTPF in 2004. During his review the Comptroller and Auditor General received the full and comprehensive co-operation of the fund and of my Department. The responses from the fund and my Department to the issues raised in the Comptroller and Auditor General's report have been fully recorded in the text of the report and are a matter of public record. As a statutory body funded by the Exchequer, the annual accounts of the national treatment purchase fund will be audited by the Comptroller and Auditor General. The fund's accounts for 2004 are currently being audited by the Comptroller and Auditor General. It is a matter for the Comptroller and Auditor General to decide which State organisations or State funded programmes are to be the subject of value for money audits.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.