Written answers

Wednesday, 29 June 2005

10:00 pm

Photo of Billy TimminsBilly Timmins (Wicklow, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 175: To ask the Minister for Finance the number and name of companies that had tax liabilities of £200,000 or more written off by the Revenue Commissioners from 1979 to 1982 inclusive; the amounts written off; the reason for this; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23108/05]

Photo of Billy TimminsBilly Timmins (Wicklow, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 176: To ask the Minister for Finance the number and name of companies that had tax liabilities of £200,000 or more written off by the Revenue Commissioners from 1988 to 1992 inclusive; the amounts written off; the reason for this; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23109/05]

Photo of Brian CowenBrian Cowen (Laois-Offaly, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I propose to take Questions Nos. 175 and 176 together.

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that for the years to which the Deputy's questions relate, it is not possible to provide a breakdown of tax write off between the different categories of taxpayer whether individual, company or partnership. Due to confidentiality considerations, Revenue is not in a position to provide the names of taxpayers who had tax liabilities written off by them.

The annual tax write off for the periods 1979 to 1982 and 1988 to 1992 is as follows:

Year 1979 1980 1981 1982
Amount Written offâ'¬772,937 â'¬673,578 â'¬625,427 â'¬1,368,624
Year 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992
Amount Written offâ'¬16,629,760 â'¬38,261,018 â'¬63,654,509 â'¬109,046,376 â'¬124,236,253

The reason for the write off is set out in the following tables. The classification of grounds for write off changed over the years in question and these are reflected in the tables.

1979 1980 1981 1982
â'¬â'¬â'¬â'¬
Composition Settlements 136,592 22,471 5,160 4,243
Compassionate Grounds 61,625 48,098 55,229 60,476
Miscellaneous: Liability not enforceable, etc. 574,720 603,009 565,038 1,303,905
Total 772,937 673,578 625,427 1,368,624
1988 1989 1990 1991 1992
â'¬â'¬â'¬â'¬â'¬
Compassionate grounds 168,875 2,825,167 1,719,225 2,456,943 2,425,200
Ceased trading — no assets 7,078,790 8,905,934 21,440,797 51,391,379 63,571,976
Liquidation — receivership — bankruptcy 4,337,425 10,171,872 16,785,937 18,795,933 31,743,452
Cannot be traced — outside the jurisdiction 5,044,670 16,358,036 23,708,550 36,402,121 26,495,625
Total 16,629,760 38,261,018 63,654,509 109,046,376 124,236,253

The main reason for the increase in the value of write off over the period 1988 to 1992 was due to a review of tax arrears on record which commenced after the 1988 amnesty. This review which was ongoing over the years 1988 to 1992 led not only to more effective collection of taxes but also, inevitably, to the increase in the amount of taxes deemed irrecoverable.

It should be noted that the amount written off may overstate the actual liability as many of the cases included estimated amounts. Following an examination of tax write off arrangements in place prior to 1997, Revenue received general approval from the Comptroller and Auditor General for the criteria to be used in new arrangements for the write off of tax debt. These procedures are subject to audit on an annual basis and the results are published in the annual report of the Comptroller and Auditor General.

Photo of Billy TimminsBilly Timmins (Wicklow, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 177: To ask the Minister for Finance if a company (details supplied) or any related company had tax liabilities written off by the Revenue Commissioners of more than £200,000 between 1979 and 1983, inclusive; if so, the amounts written off; the reason for this; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23110/05]

Photo of Brian CowenBrian Cowen (Laois-Offaly, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that they are unable to provide any information regarding the tax affairs of a company other than when the Deputy asking the question is asking it on behalf of the company concerned. As it would appear that the Deputy is not asking the question with the consent of the company mentioned, the Revenue Commissioners are unable to provide the information sought as the tax affairs of the company are confidential between them and the Revenue Commissioners.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.