Written answers

Tuesday, 1 March 2005

Department of Defence

Common Foreign and Security Policy

9:00 pm

Photo of Dan BoyleDan Boyle (Cork South Central, Green Party)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 96: To ask the Minister for Defence if the position of British and French nuclear weapons has been discussed within the European security and defence policy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6749/05]

Photo of Ciarán CuffeCiarán Cuffe (Dún Laoghaire, Green Party)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 130: To ask the Minister for Defence if the stationing of 480 US nuclear weapons in eight bases in six European countries, five of which are in the EU, has been discussed at meetings of EU Defence Ministers; the implications of these weapons for the EU defence policy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6750/05]

Photo of Willie O'DeaWillie O'Dea (Limerick East, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I propose to take Questions Nos. 96 and 130 together.

At the European Council at Helsinki in 1999, member states set themselves a headline goal, that is, that "by the year 2003, co-operating together and voluntarily, they will be able to deploy rapidly and then sustain forces capable of the full range of Petersberg Tasks as set out in the Amsterdam Treaty", that is, in short, humanitarian, rescue, peacekeeping and crisis management operations including peacemaking.

The ambition of the EU, to be able to respond rapidly to emerging crises and undertake Petersberg Tasks peace support missions, has and continues to be the key objective of the development of the European Security and Defence Policy, ESDP. Accordingly, the issue of nuclear weapons, apart from the protection of personnel against the effects of nuclear, biological and chemical, NBC, agents, has not and does not arise in the context of participation in ESDP.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.